Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:37 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,307 posts, read 39,701,648 times
Reputation: 21376

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
We will see how much of an outlier those are in the 2020 census. I will leave it at that.
Right, so you're banking on 2020 census, but there's nothing presented that would contradict what he says so by necessity you're going to have to wait and see and you by necessity will have to leave it at that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:38 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,570,025 times
Reputation: 9193
Okay, you win DC... You're the most urban and vibrant core outside the "Big 6"...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:40 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,307 posts, read 39,701,648 times
Reputation: 21376
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
No, but DTLA is more centrally located within its region. The Chicago Loop is on a lakefront.


Ok. I could see how Century City and Burbank sneak in that way. Still not sure about Westwood--the geographic heart is a good 13 miles from DTLA. Regardless, it's a boatload of jobs and humanity. I would love to do a job count of just Central LA and the Westside.
Central LA and the Westside combined would be a pretty large expanse. Not knocking that though as a polycentric layout can be pretty good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:42 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,580,133 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Okay, you win DC... You're the most urban and vibrant core outside the "Big 6"...
What exactly does the 6th place runner-up in Miss Vibrant Urban Core win?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:44 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,570,025 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
What exactly does the 6th place runner-up in Miss Vibrant Urban Core win?
The Home Edition of the "Most Vibrant Urban Core?!" game and a gift certificate to Target... You did it DC boosters, you did it....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,755 posts, read 15,842,503 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
40-50K where


they range between 7 and 20K (max) and within less 1/2 a mile drop sometimes below 3K

Mapping the 2010 U.S. Census - NYTimes.com


Places like Reston today are averaging in the areas closer to the Silver line are closer to 3-6K and drop below that just outside; even if based on your link they add the 30K by 2050 (that was the long range plan based on your link earlier) they would be on average like 10-12K at a small peak - that gives way to less dense very quickly in 40 years


edit : my bad I did find a 52K and 44K ppsm that has about 5K people living in them and represent .2 sq miles combined; the area averages far closer to 8-11K and drops off really fast to 4K or less - they were the outliers - and represent .1% of the metro population.

Now again I think the plan and development is good but the numbers and sheer densities you discuss are outliers as best and don't portray any large portion of the area - that is my issue - not the development itself but how you describe it incorrectly

These are the most dense census tracts in the Rosslyn Ballston Corridor.

Census Tract 101403
47,691 per. sq. mile (5,609 people)

Census Tract 101701
44,245 per. sq. mile (4,166 people)

Census Tract 101802
39,743 per. sq. mile (6,072 people)

Census Tract 101404
35,570 per. sq. mile (4,255 people)

Census Tract 101702
33,622 per. sq. mile (4,965 people)


I don't know what point your trying to prove really. Over the next 20 years, this corridor will continue to grow with high-rise development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:57 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,667,264 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Huh? The Rosslyn-Ballston corridor has census tracts in the 40k-50k people per square mile range and that will only increase with what is being built there. So does Silver Spring Md. In 20 years, all metro lines will be like that. Have you seen what is being built around the DC metro stations? Almost all growth will be funneled to metro stations by law here in the region. That's how Arlington Va got that way. Row house neighborhoods don't reach 40k-50k density unless they have high-rises mixed in which means they aren't rowhouse neighborhoods.
The last sentence is false, you can get 40-50k / sq mile without any high rises whatsoever. Rowhouses are possible but you're reaching, but if your rowhouses are two units (say the 4 story ones found in Brooklyn), you reach 50k and then some. A small tract of South Boston reaches 46k/sq mile:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=South...292.48,,0,7.86
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,755 posts, read 15,842,503 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
The last sentence is false, you can get 40-50k / sq mile without any high rises whatsoever. Rowhouses are possible but you're reaching, but if your rowhouses are two units (say the 4 story ones found in Brooklyn), you reach 50k and then some. A small tract of South Boston reaches 46k/sq mile:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=South...292.48,,0,7.86

What's the socio economic status for that area? I apologize. I was talking about a young professional census tract reaching that level. You can get density with single family homes really. Look at L.A. Depends on who is living there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:06 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,307 posts, read 39,701,648 times
Reputation: 21376
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
What's the socio economic status for that area? I apologize. I was talking about a young professional census tract reaching that level. You can get density with single family homes really. Look at L.A. Depends on who is living there.
You can definitely get predominantly rowhouse neighborhoods with high density tracts with high socio-economic status. Park Slope is probably a prime example of that.

South Boston is a large mix where it was originally working class but has experienced significant gentrification in the past decade or two. If the 2010 census wasn't enough though, you can always wait for the 2020 census and just leave it at that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,701 posts, read 14,741,882 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsimms3 View Post
Remind me which Philadelphia suburbs have densities of 20-30K? That's average SF city limits density...probably average Philly city limits density over much of the city. It's pretty undisputable that overall, CA suburbs are the most dense on average. SF's suburbs range from 5K (mostly around the Valley and in to Santa Clara County where San Jose is) to 11,000 ppsm (Berkeley) to 13,000 ppsm (Daly City) down to 3,200 ppsm (Walnut Creek way out in the East Bay). Having family in the Philly burbs, I find it very very hard to comprehend that they are any denser than the most dense suburban cities of the Bay Area, which don't really top 13,000 ppsm and rarely exceed 10,000 ppsm. Camden, NJ is less than 9,000 ppsm and is probably the most dense Philly suburb I can think of (it is essentially right across the river).

NYC has a lot of dense suburbs, but overall in its expansive MSA land area definitions, has a ton of super low density suburbs, as well (very typical for most of the country, especially the NE). The only 3 metro areas that actually maintain high density by American standards are the Bay Area, Los Angeles, and New York.
IDK if Philly has any burbs that reach 20-30k per-say, but there are definitely higher density burbs than Camden.

Camden is mostly a rundown, abandoned ghetto. Mostly abandoned buildings, rundown neighborhoods with tons of empty lots, and large surface parking lots in what is considered the "downtown." Camden certainly is built to be a much denser city, and at one time in history it was, and maybe one time it will be again in the future, but as of right now, no.

Some higher density and MUCH nicer burbs around Philly include:

Millbourne: 16,557 ppsm
Millbourne, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conshohocken: 13,138 ppsm
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Darby: 12,624 ppsm
Darby, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

East Lansdowne: 12,517 ppsm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_La...,_Pennsylvania

Parkside: 10,897 ppsm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkside,_Pennsylvania

Clifton Heights: 10,882 ppsm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifton...,_Pennsylvania

Upper Darby: 10,397 ppsm
Upper Darby Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

West Chester: 10,256 ppsm
West Chester, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Collingdale: 10,107
Collingdale, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Norristown: 9,806
Norristown, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drexel Hill: 9,113 ppsm
Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last edited by RightonWalnut; 04-14-2014 at 07:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top