Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please feel to enlighten me on actual information to counter my statement. Because you used a lot of words to say "you're wrong" but didn't actually present any supporting information.
I don't want to sound too condescending, even though I suspect my reply will come off that way.
My education, both in grade school and college, afforded me a decent knowledge base that took many years. My personal interests in things like presidents, our Founding Father's, the Constitution and it's original intent, led me to spend countless time researching things to further educate myself on these subjects.
Needless to say, while wanting to help others see the light so to speak, I cannot invest the time needed for someone to see that light. This is especially true of someone who sounds like they are already predisposed to be hostile to the very notion of the FF's original meaning of how our Constitutional Republic should be run.
Hence the reason I specifically suggested you educate yourself further by reading the Federalist Papers.
You might find that it is more educational and interesting than you might initially surmise.
I don't want to sound too condescending, even though I suspect my reply will come off that way.
My education, both in grade school and college, afforded me a decent knowledge base that took many years. My personal interests in things like presidents, our Founding Father's, the Constitution and it's original intent, led me to spend countless time researching things to further educate myself on these subjects.
Needless to say, while wanting to help others see the light so to speak, I cannot invest the time needed for someone to see that light. This is especially true of someone who sounds like they are already predisposed to be hostile to the very notion of the FF's original meaning of how our Constitutional Republic should be run.
Hence the reason I specifically suggested you educate yourself further by reading the Federalist Papers.
You might find that it is more educational and interesting than you might initially surmise.
`
And you still haven't said anything of substance that negates my earlier statement. Okay.
People are addicted to bitching about things that have no effect on them whatsoever.
Wow, we are at opposite ends of the spectrum.
It is cause and effect.
Don't think for a millisecond that their are not reasons behind such things. Many time the biggest problems results from the sheep just accepting that the road was being built with the best of intentions.
Criminal illegal aliens flocking to "sanctuary cities" and the resulting problems for example.
Of course by the time the problems arise, it is too late to close Pandora's Box. Even if Frisco stopped their madness today, it would do Kate Steinle no good. Nor would it do any good for Jamiel Andre Shaw II or Joshua Wilkerson who were both killed by so called "Dreamers" under Obama's DACA. These are two of many innocent Americans in our country who are murdered in anonymity to the general public. But these are American citizens being killed under the liberal guise of doing something with the best intentions.
On a related side note, you do realize that many crimes are committed in this country by illegal aliens right?
So despite what La Raza and the liberal media would say, gangs like MS-13 came here from El Salvador where they grew up in hit squads and paramilitaries. They are so ruthless, the mortal enemies of black gangs of the Crips & Bloods had to band together just to survive. Sure they are bad guys, but they are still American citizens.
Now you might say, who cares about brown gangbangers killing black gangbangers, but their crime and mayhem is not restricted to only attacking each other. Instead they have criminal enterprises spreading across the country. Now why on earth can we as a society not say, lets round up every one of these MS-13 members and take all the illegal ones, and ship them back to El Salvador?
Didn't help you with correct usage of apostrophes though, did it?
Let me guess, you are of the opposite political persuasion and just wanted to try and get in a little dig on the opposing team?
I'm sure if I looked at all the major grammatical errors of the posts from those on your team, you take the time to do it to them also, right?
And you still haven't said anything of substance that negates my earlier statement. Okay.
Absurd post on it's face.
Let's try one more time.
Take the time to educate yourself as I did on this complex and time consuming subject. Trying to cajole me into providing the info to you will not work, and exposes your own lack of interest and/or laziness.
I support gender fluidity. The idea that there are two genders and nobody does or should fall outside of that narrow conception and the idea that no one could genuinely self-identify as another gender are ones that will be dying off with the old people who still think them.
And yet, I'm also in partial agreement that maybe it's a question that doesn't even need to be asked, at least at the admissions application level.
Either you are born with a dyck or a vag. Some rare cases both. It's really pretty simple...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.