Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2008, 02:43 PM
 
Location: SUNNY AZ
4,589 posts, read 13,164,736 times
Reputation: 1850

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topaz View Post
I would be much more enthusiastic about keeping this type of journal instead of counting anything. Have you lost weight doing this?
I've been into working out my entire life (or for as long as I can remember) but I have known people who have used this as a sort of jumping off point for weight los....it is sooo important to know where, when and when you are eating unhealthy, so yes, I really think this is an awesome excersize for beginers! I know that counting calories is sooooo boaring and time consuming but knowing you DCI (daily caloric intake) is so important if you are trying to loose weight. DCI + DCE (Daily calories expended) = weight loss. I have a great site for you too, might help a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2008, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
4,760 posts, read 13,827,101 times
Reputation: 3280
Is there a free online support group for people who are counting calories? Too bad City Data doesn't have a forum just for that...I certainly visit this site often enough!

For those of you who have done Weight Watchers, what was better about counting points instead of calories?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2008, 12:15 PM
 
Location: (WNY)
5,384 posts, read 10,869,300 times
Reputation: 7664
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmerkyGrl View Post
No, because it is often more than just calories.

Something might be low in calories but also low in fiber/nutrition and thus about as effective and nourishing as sawdust. On the other hand, there are plenty of other foods that are actually higher in calories/fat but are nutritious and sustaining---like avocado---and are excellent for diets.
Totally agree... I try and make sure I eat the right amounts of fiber/protien/fats... The more fiber you eat the better... TOO much Protien and Fats are not healthy on the kidneys or heart....I worry about Cals after I have made sure of the other three...but if it is way too high I pass it by... I also do not drink my calories... I find that wasteful... I would rather have an ice water and EAT something- it gives me so much more satisfaction to actually CHEW something.... LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 08:11 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,562,134 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickSantos View Post
Body fat systems operate over a year or more. Not meal to meal, day to day or month to month.
Weight watchers manages weekly consumption. While I sometimes get an odd result in a given week (zero loss in a week when I didnt eat my weekly extra points, over a pound lost in a week when I did eat them) over time the loss has been steady. AFAIK the vast majority of people who do WW and STICK with it, manage to lose, and to do so steadily. I someone people who regained after leaving WW - but she not only wasnt tracking any more, she was avoiding looking at a scale

The control MOST of us have is substantial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 08:13 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,562,134 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickSantos View Post
Calorie lables themselves are off by as much as 25 % (potato chips) to 80 %(cheese cursl) in certain cases.
As i have always said when counting WW points - look, sometimes I will estimate high, sometimes low - it will all wash in the end. And by not eating all my weekly extra points, or all my exercise points, I have slack anyway. Im not real worried about a minor error in a label.

I can see this WOULD be a problem if you only ate ONE food all week. I can't consider that a healthy or sustainable approach though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 03:38 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
858 posts, read 2,993,425 times
Reputation: 708
Well all I can say is I count calories and have lost 45 Lbs since November. I write down everything I eat with the associated calories in a little book I keep with me.

At my weight I can have 1,200 calories a day, and stick to that during the week; I allow my self to relax a little over the weekend, where I can have 1,700 calories. So far it's working for me. My wife is also counting calories

Yeah, it's a little old fashioned writing in a little book, but as someone above noted, simply seeing those numbers has kept me honest and served me well.

My doctor said I was the poster child for weight loss, and asked me how I was doing it on a consistent basis; I told him writing down everything keeps me honest. If you cheat, you are only cheating yorself, and in reality nothing will work then.

While I may have started my diet (hate to use that word) by Counting calories, overall, counting calories has forced me to relook what I was eating and my eating habits.

Some folks challenge or do not agree that counting calories works, but in the end, I am not just simply counting calories, I have transitioned to a better life style.

Bottom line: It works for me and my wife, and that's all we are concerned with.

Try it, you may like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 06:11 PM
 
Location: In a house
13,250 posts, read 42,783,686 times
Reputation: 20198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topaz View Post
I would be much more enthusiastic about keeping this type of journal instead of counting anything. Have you lost weight doing this?
You still have to know the values of what you're putting into your journal. You won't lose even half a pound..

if all you're doing is putting in:

Breakfast: 2 pieces of wheat toast with butter, a mug of coffee, sugar and milk

Lunch: cheeseburger with lettuce and tomato, side salad with balsamic vinegrette, diet coke.

Dinner: boneless chicken breast, brown rice, lemon water, scoop of ice cream.

You need to know about the sauce you put on that chicken breast. Was it made with olive oil? Did it have fatback in it? If it's from a jar, did it have sugar/corn syrup in it? How much was on there?

Writing down what you eat, doesn't tell you whether or not you're eating enough, too much, not enough, or all the wrong kinds of food. You need SOME measurements. Even if they're near estimates. You need to know approximately how many calories. OR how many grams of fat. OR how many carbs. Or a combination. That salad dressing? You might be using WAY too much, and it could be sabotaging your entire attempt to get to a healthy weight.

But if all you're doing is writing down how many teaspoons you put on the salad, you won't know if it's too much or not, because you don't know how much each teaspoon is worth, in dietary language. If a teaspoon of your special balsamic vinegrette contains 30 calories and 5 grams of fat each, then you know that IF you want to cut back on fats, then cutting back 1 teaspoon of the dressing, will reduce your daily intake by 5 grams.

Even then, it won't help if you don't know how many grams it takes to add another pound of fat to your body, given your current exercise regime, your metabolism, your current weight/height/bone structure, and overall health.

So there's more to it than simply writing down what you eat. You have to know what those notes MEAN.

Weight watchers is helpful because it gives point values to foods; it does all the calorie counting for you. It says something like: You're allowed 6 points of this, 3 points of that, and 4 points of that every day. - That chicken parm is worth 2 points of meat, 1 point of veggies, 1 point of sugars/fats. All you have to do is make sure that you don't go over the points.

Last edited by AnonChick; 05-17-2011 at 06:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
4,760 posts, read 13,827,101 times
Reputation: 3280
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonChick View Post
You still have to know the values of what you're putting into your journal. You won't lose even half a pound..
You are probably right because I'm not losing weight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2011, 03:55 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
858 posts, read 2,993,425 times
Reputation: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topaz View Post
You are probably right because I'm not losing weight.
Topaz, Do you know how many calories you can per day in order to lose 1 or 2 Lbs per week? You need to know that before yoou can begin to lose weight.

If not, you need to use one of the many on line calculators like: Recommended Daily Calorie Intake Calculator for Adult males, females & Children & Pregnant Women - Hpathy.com

WW is also good; same principle as you are counting, but maybe a little easier?

It's a slow process, as for long term weight loss, I don't think you can rush weigt loss. However, if you stick to it, it will work.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2011, 08:31 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,562,134 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonChick View Post
Weight watchers is helpful because it gives point values to foods; it does all the calorie counting for you. It says something like: You're allowed 6 points of this, 3 points of that, and 4 points of that every day. - That chicken parm is worth 2 points of meat, 1 point of veggies, 1 point of sugars/fats. All you have to do is make sure that you don't go over the points.
just to clarify

WW hasnt been doing "protein exchanges" "veggie exchanges" etc for years. Now its just points (actually Points Plus TM) And veggies (other than starchy tubers) are zero points. They encourage you to get a mix of food groups/macronutrients, but you no longer have to track them (it seems that complexity in tracking has been the biggest obstacle, and AFAICT most of the recent changes have been to make tracking easier)


And while its not the WW approach, I would suggest that even journaling WITHOUT estimating calories/points can be helpful, at least in the more extreme cases. You may not be sure how many calories are in a scoop of ice cream - but you sure will say "OMG! I had a whole CONTAINER of ice cream!" When I was at my peak weight, I was eating in ways that even simple journaling with no numbers would have hinted was a bad idea. I did change that (without journaling though) and lost a good bit of weight - but then I plateaued while still overweight.

Of course if somone cant tell that a huge bowl of salad is less calories than a huge bowl of ice cream, I guess that approach wouldnt help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top