Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry, dude. When you're talking about America, there ain't no such thing as the Democrat Party ... despite how often that erroneous form of name is used by the ignorant right.
Well, it isn't "Democratic," therefor, "Democrat." Besides, you don't refer to the Republican Party as the "Republicanic Party," do you?
Well, it isn't "Democratic," therefor, "Democrat." Besides, you don't refer to the Republican Party as the "Republicanic Party," do you?
you are right, it is referred to by people who know the language, as the Democrat party. Democrat is a noun or name; democratic is an adjective, even I know that much.
Do you realize or maybe you don't not all conservatives support Limbaugh. In fact most of us do not even listen to him, unlike libs who think MSNBC is the gospel network. People can get excited about any candidate; I am sure Hillary is glad to have someone take her on. Otherwise she would be stale by the time we get to this time next year, but sanders is still a socialist (or worse) and will have trouble raising money or get his agenda across. Add to this,he will be 75 in November 2016. And some people think Hillary is pushing it a little. It is time for the new guys, the young faces, and the young ideas to take over.
I got news for you nmita. No liberal takes MSNBC seriously. Unlike a typical Republican voter who most likely religiously watches Fox News, the average liberal voter does not watch MSNBC at all. Most of the Democratic Party base doesn't even watch mainstream news, period. Stop projecting
Any Democratic candidate that slings dirt Hillary's way without the usual "right-winger shaming" has my support!
This same scenario took place in 2012. Herman Cain and Rick Santorum were the ideological favorites of the candidates, and they made Mitt Romney look bad to the traditional base by making him look like a moderate. In the end, he never really recovered from that; the base wasn't excited. I can see Sanders doing the same thing to Hillary. He most likely won't get the nomination, but he'll create doubts about Clinton in the minds of loyal Democrats. That's great news for Republicans!
Sorry, dude. When you're talking about America, there ain't no such thing as the Democrat Party ... despite how often that erroneous form of name is used by the ignorant right.
actually its you guys on the left that constantly don't understand definitions
democratic.... a FORM of government... a WAY of government...a TYPE of government...democracy
the party of the democrats...the democrats... a political party
the fact is, it is the democrat party.... that is the PROPER term
you are describing the name of a party...not a type of government
Odd, Bernie claims over and over that he isn't a Democrat, that he is an independent, but here he is running as a Democrat.
I would be far more willing to vote for a Sanders (I) than a Sanders (D).
This is the problem with Bernie Sanders. He talks a good game but has absolutely no principles.
actually most databases have Bernie listed as D,I,S...... democrat/independent /socialist (sometimes a democratic socialist)
former mayor of NYC... Bloomberg was the same way... changed parties like people change their bathwater
Last edited by workingclasshero; 04-30-2015 at 12:34 PM..
Reason: have not has
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.