Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes. My bad. Ohio is where Obama did so well because of Romney's anti-worker positions and lies about Jeep. And Clinton is still beating Trump by an even larger margin. Portman is doing well proving they really have no use for Trump in that state.
We shall see how they trend for the next few weeks.
I thought the changing demographics, Trump being branded insane/racist/sexist (etc), billions in TV adds, biased media coverage and 1 gazillion high ranking anti-Trump republicans would make the state child's play for a dem.
By Ohio's standards, HRC's +4.8 lead for the month of August is actually quite sizeable.
If that holds, it would be the largest margin of victory by any candidate, Democrat or Republican, since 1996. But yeah, Donald has Clinton right where he wants her.
Likely a bit of an outlier but it does give us insight into why Clinton stopped advertising in Colorado and Virginia as well. The guys that run Benchmark Politics and Brandon Finnigan of Decision Desk HQ have said both states demographically are out of Trumps reach for months.
General Election Clinton 43, Trump 38, Johnson 11, Stein 5
That's still too high for Johnson and Stein. We should be seeing them drop in the coming weeks. The same survey has her by 8 without them. Either way, there has been virtually no change in a month. Trump is treading water at best and is about to go under.
That's still too high for Johnson and Stein. We should be seeing them drop in the coming weeks. The same survey has her by 8 without them. Either way, there has been virtually no change in a month. Trump is treading water at best and is about to go under.
That's what you would think but they usually start dropping after the conventions. Of course usually the conventions aren't until now either.
That's what you would think but they usually start dropping after the conventions. Of course usually the conventions aren't until now either.
I would have thought Johnson would be hurting Trump, but it seems like he is hurting Clinton more. When the pollsters ask them to choose they choose Clinton too and the gap increases. I guess they don't love her at all but forced to choose they find Clinton less objectionable.
I would have thought Johnson would be hurting Trump, but it seems like he is hurting Clinton more. When the pollsters ask them to choose they choose Clinton too and the gap increases. I guess they don't love her at all but forced to choose they find Clinton less objectionable.
No, it's about equal with Johnson. It's Stein that is dropping Clinton the most. Of course she does seem to slowly be losing support over the months as well.
No, it's about equal with Johnson. It's Stein that is dropping Clinton the most. Of course she does seem to slowly be losing support over the months as well.
Maybe.
Clinton and Trump and Johnson all hold steady whether you measure Clinton/Trump/Johnson or Clinton/Trump/Johnson/Stein.
Maybe Stein voters are simply Green voters who will not vote for anything other than Green Party. No Green Party; no vote.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
