Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2016, 06:38 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dole-McCain Republican View Post
The bottom line is that partisan Democrats believed the bulls#it that the "blue wall" would guarantee them the presidency for all time to come. They couldn't possibly foresee that they would lose MI, PA, & WI, and so they never complained about the Electoral College prior to Election Day.

I've personally had enough whining from the far-left about the Electoral College to last me a lifetime. Back in 2012, when Democrats thought they had a huge advantage in the Electoral College, left-wing websites published articles such as this:

Defending the Electoral College.

Of course, after the election, the liberal hypocrites immediately turned on the Electoral College:

The Electoral College is an instrument of white supremacy and sexism.

And will the left please quit pretending that they actually believe that the person who receives the most votes should win. (The only reason why liberals believe that the popular vote winner in 2016 should be president is because their candidate won the popular vote.) As has been pointed out on this forum, Clinton received more votes than Obama in the 2008 Democratic primaries, yet the far-left was perfectly fine with their beloved Obama getting the nomination. Furthermore, left-wing loons repeatedly tried to deny the legitimacy of Bush's victory in 2004, despite the fact that he received 3 million more votes than Kerry. (If you recall, partisan Democrats claimed that "racist" Republicans stole the election in Ohio, which was a state that Bush won by 118,601 votes. Had some 60,000 votes shifted and Kerry won Ohio, he would have been the winner despite losing the popular vote.)
Liberals decide what they want first, and then make up a "principle" to support it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2016, 06:40 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,398 posts, read 60,592,880 times
Reputation: 61018
Quote:
Originally Posted by whocares811 View Post
Nothing would make me happier politically this month than seeing Kasich win the presidency, after all.
Not.
Going.
To.
Happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 06:45 AM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284
Trump won with a lower percentage of the popular vote (currently 46.1% and falling) than any of his predecessors with the exception of Bill Clinton in 1992 (43.01%) and John Quincy Adams in 1824 (31.92%), both of whom had significant third party opposition, which Trump did not.

That fact and $5 will get you a nice latte at Starbucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Bothell, Washington
2,811 posts, read 5,627,270 times
Reputation: 4009
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Vega View Post
If you take out all the illegal and fraudulent votes then Trump won the popular vote too.
Absolute BS- voter fraud is very hard to pull off, it's why there have been only tiny numbers of fraud that have happened going back decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 06:54 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by refineryworker73 View Post
But Trump for months ran on"crooked hilarity". Trump said out of his own mouth that if elected president that her crimes were so egregious that she'd be in jail.

He wins and then during his first televised interview says I don't care about it.

So that means either he was lying about Hilary's crimes or he is willing to let corruption stand.

On immigration he is no longer saying all 11 million. He is saying only criminals will be deported which is the exact same stance as President Obama. Speaker Ryan says there will be no mass deportations.

And Trump has already shown you directly that just because he said something with conviction during his campaign that doesn't mean he even cares about it.

Sanctuary cities what's he going to do?

To punish a whole city would take tremendous resources and be an extremely divisive fight.

How's he going to keep muslims out without discriminating against Muslims?

But these issues are not important to me directly.

If more Mexican immigrants get deported and allowed entry or fewer muslims or no muslims are allowed to come in, it'll prove trump's campaign and his very narrow victory were all about being against certain ethnic and religious groups because a lot of Americans blame these people and believe their removal and elimination will be a good thing.


I'll be very sad as to what those things mean for all Americans who are not the right ethnicity/racial/religion.
You're used to the corrupt Obama, who tells his attorney general what to do.

That's not the proper role for a president. The attorney general is supposed to be independent.

Just because Trump is being gracious doesn't mean that Hillary, Bill, Obama, Loretta and Eric aren't going to be prosecuted for their many crimes.

Trump stopped saying there would be mass deportations long before he was elected. His supporters still voted for him.

They will expect him to deport illegal aliens who commit crimes, finish the border fencing already approved by Congress, take action against sanctuary cities, and take other steps to enforce the law that now exists.

That law says that illegals are to be deported.

Foreigners -- including Muslims -- do not have a right to come to this country.

Trump will keep them out.

If Mexicans want to be liked by Americans, they shouldn't come here illegally.

If Muslims want to be liked and admitted here, they shouldn't commit terrorist acts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:00 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm31828 View Post
Absolute BS- voter fraud is very hard to pull off, it's why there have been only tiny numbers of fraud that have happened going back decades.
Voter fraud is a way of life in California, which encourages illegal aliens to vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:00 AM
 
17,344 posts, read 11,285,635 times
Reputation: 40980
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Reminder that half of the American public is stupid.
That would have most likely been the half that voted for Hillary a pathological liar with no morals. The other half voted with common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:02 AM
 
2,695 posts, read 3,402,005 times
Reputation: 2663
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
To the OP.
If you really believe Trump is unpopular, check the amount of folks showing up at his "thank you" rallies.
Just as many that showed up at his primary rallies.

Like all liberals that lost the election, you have blinders on, and don't want to witness the truth.

Bob.
His victory rally last night was attended by
7000 people, that's all. wow what a number of fans!
I for one do not have blinders on when it comes to
Trump's ability to lie and deceive .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,735 posts, read 3,254,101 times
Reputation: 3147
and again...its this narrative, name calling and labelling that got Trump elected.
Labelling people calling them stupid will not convince anyone to see your point of view.


Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Reminder that half of the American public is stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:06 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,904,929 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by refineryworker73 View Post
What did I bring up.

You corrected nothing.
Try reading what I quoted. Or, play dumb, I don't really care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top