How is Walker up to 3 points ahead? (enemies, bias, regular)

[ShenardL]

Originally Posted by atl2021

Well, there you have it folks!!!

"If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back."

No point in engaging with people who can't think rationally and are stubborn.

[atl2021]

Originally Posted by ShenardL

"If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back."

No point in engaging with people who can't think rationally and are stubborn.

You are absolutely correct!!!

[Soujouner]

Originally Posted by atl2021

Well, there you have it folks!!! This video sums it up perfectly - https://youtu.be/ri40RBJG7jI

There you have it folks, this video sums up Warnock perfectly. https://youtu.be/qWGiZ7C4c7k

[Soujouner]

Originally Posted by ShenardL

"If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back."

No point in engaging with people who can't think rationally and are stubborn.

And yet you don’t even realize BiDeng is the sociopathic pathological lying charlatan whose about to get us into WWIII. BiDeng is a reckless low IQ president. How these truths elude the left is astonishing.

[Soujouner]

Originally Posted by Good Reading

How is having a bold faced liar and a guy who has 4 kids from 4 different women a better choice? This country is now officially crazy.

What makes you believe a false preacher whose a Marxist and who has a history of inflicting domestic abuse is a better candidate? If you’re solely choosing your candidate based on character, Warnock falls short. Unless you’re choosing your candidate based on ideology which his is antithetical to our constitutional republic.

[Mutiny77]

Originally Posted by Soujouner

Who has claimed a black man murdered by the police deserved what he got? Can you cite such a claim? Weren’t all these officers involved with George Floyd charged, tried, and convicted?

Lots of folks on social media claimed such, and lots of people weren't exactly happy about the convictions of the officers.

I’m sorry in having to enlighten you, but the police aren’t the issue in the black community. Black victims are more likely to be victimized by those who live in their community.

You're not "enlightening" me on anything seeing as though I've been Black all my life, but I'd like to point out that people of all races are more likely to be victimized by their neighbors, who tend to belong to the same racial group.

And yes, the police are very much an issue in predominantly Black poor urban communities (and being an issue goes well beyond civilian deaths at the hands of police) and that is directly related to persistent crime issues in said communities.

[Mutiny77]

Originally Posted by Soujouner

What makes you believe a false preacher

Article VI of the Constitution of the United States provides that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

whose a Marxist

Are Marxists like the new racists or something? Everybody throws this label around but nobody bothers to explain what it means or why it's disqualifying.

and who has a history of inflicting domestic abuse

This is false: https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ction-case-dr/

is a better candidate? If you’re solely choosing your candidate based on character, Warnock falls short.

You have failed to demonstrate such. Warnock has no documented history of inflicting domestic abuse on anyone, and that's the only thing you mentioned related to character. Theological differences are irrelevant as religious tests are not administered in the U.S. as a prerequisite for public office. And Marxist belongs with socialist, communist, fascist, nationalist, etc.--you can't be a member of Congress without having at least one of those labels pinned on you by political opponents. Voters largely tune out when this happens since they are virtually meaningless when everybody is supposedly at least one of them.

The truth of the matter is that Sen. Warnock is eminently qualified to occupy the office of U.S. senator. Carpetbagger Herschel Walker isn't qualified to be dogcatcher.

[Thulsa]

Another accusation made here against Warnock is that he called the police "thugs" and cut police funding.
Wrong.
https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ed-police-thu/

As usual you need to know the context. Warnock said in a 2015 sermon
"And as they gathered in Selma — or was it Ferguson?" Warnock said at one point. "They were met with overwhelming brute force. The truth of the matter is, the road to Ferguson goes through Selma, 50 years later."

"So, in Ferguson, police power (is) showing up in a kind of gangster and thug mentality. You can wear all kinds of colors and be a thug. You can sometimes wear the colors of the state and behave like a thug."

"The bottom line is that Warnock used the word "thug" to describe certain specific police behaviors, evoking police violence in Selma and referencing police practices in Ferguson."

As for cutting police funding, that's a flat out lie.
Meanwhile, Warnock has not "cut" police funding. He sponsored a bill to help small police departments hire and keep officers. He also voted for the American Rescue Plan, which provided billions of dollars to states and local jurisdictions to invest in police departments and other efforts to secure communities.



Here's a longer article on Warnock giving more context.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...ofile-00049352

[Soujouner]

Originally Posted by Mutiny77

Lots of folks on social media claimed such, and lots of people weren't exactly happy about the convictions of the officers.



You're not "enlightening" me on anything seeing as though I've been Black all my life, but I'd like to point out that people of all races are more likely to be victimized by their neighbors, who tend to belong to the same racial group.

And yes, the police are very much an issue in predominantly Black poor urban communities (and being an issue goes well beyond civilian deaths at the hands of police) and that is directly related to persistent crime issues in said communities.

No matter what side of the political spectrum you sit at, the overwhelming vast majority of Americans were appalled at the actions of these officers including myself. In my 20 years as a police officer, I had never seen such malfeasance in restraining a subject who is clearly high and emotionally disturbed.

As I have stated, police aren’t the issue in black neighborhoods, male blacks are the issue in black neighborhoods for 3% of the population make up 60% of the known murder offenders according to the latest FBI statistics. This figure also doesn’t include data from the LAPD and NYPD. Male blacks make up 7% of the US population and when you figure out age groups, about 3% of the population is responsible for 60% of the homicides. These are the facts.

A black person is more likely to be a victim in their neighborhood than a person of any other race being a victim in the neighborhood they reside in. Police are not the issue in black communities, full stop!

[Thulsa]

Originally Posted by Mutiny77

Lots of folks on social media claimed such, and lots of people weren't exactly happy about the convictions of the officers.



You're not "enlightening" me on anything seeing as though I've been Black all my life, but I'd like to point out that people of all races are more likely to be victimized by their neighbors, who tend to belong to the same racial group.

And yes, the police are very much an issue in predominantly Black poor urban communities (and being an issue goes well beyond civilian deaths at the hands of police) and that is directly related to persistent crime issues in said communities.

Originally Posted by Soujouner

No matter what side of the political spectrum you sit at, the overwhelming vast majority of Americans were appalled at the actions of these officers including myself. In my 20 years as a police officer, I had never seen such malfeasance in restraining a subject who is clearly high and emotionally disturbed.

As I have stated, police aren’t the issue in black neighborhoods, male blacks are the issue in black neighborhoods for 3% of the population make up 60% of the known murder offenders according to the latest FBI statistics. This figure also doesn’t include data from the LAPD and NYPD. Male blacks make up 7% of the US population and when you figure out age groups, about 3% of the population is responsible for 60% of the homicides. These are the facts.

A black person is more likely to be a victim in their neighborhood than a person of any other race being a victim in the neighborhood they reside in. Police are not the issue in black communities, full stop!

Umm, Mutiny77 and Soujouner, y'all have gone off topic here.