Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think the Southwest "morally" belongs to the Mexicans?
Yes, its their land that we took. 12 11.54%
No, we won it fair and square. 87 83.65%
Not sure, dont really know the whole situation. 5 4.81%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2008, 10:59 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,244,990 times
Reputation: 2661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaBear View Post
The Spanish mugged the Aztecs, etc.

Then Texas kicked Mexico out in 1836-------Tx was its own country for about a decade.

The past is the past------it cannot be changed.

Besides: if one wishes to be technical about things------France owned Mexico after 1848.

Another part of Mexico that 'got away' was Guatemala------yet, Mx does not seem to want that land back.

Strictly speaking, Mx has only been independent since 1867.
Now here we agree with the exception that controlling a country does not make you the legitamate owner. That requires the acquiescense of the people who live there. Colonialist control...they don't own.

And we agree that this all went down a long time ago and is not up for discussion.

Except in idiot polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2008, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Cali
3,955 posts, read 7,208,963 times
Reputation: 2308
If the southwest had stayed in Mexico's hands do any of you honestly believe that San Francisco would have two great bridges and cable cars? Do you think Mexico would have been able to build Hoover Dam??

Get serious people.lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2008, 07:55 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,781,705 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaBear View Post
The Spanish mugged the Aztecs, etc.

Then Texas kicked Mexico out in 1836-------Tx was its own country for about a decade.

The past is the past------it cannot be changed.

Besides: if one wishes to be technical about things------France owned Mexico after 1848.

Another part of Mexico that 'got away' was Guatemala------yet, Mx does not seem to want that land back.

Strictly speaking, Mx has only been independent since 1867.
Sir Francis Drake claimed California for England before the Spaniards knew California existed. You could say Spain stole California and whatever portion of that area that Drake claimed from England.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2008, 08:00 AM
 
2,881 posts, read 6,096,438 times
Reputation: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
Yet again another idiot pool.

We mugged Mexico, put in a US controlled regime and then settled with it. Could really not have been more criminal. The Pres intended to absorb Mexico into the US and almost pulled it off. Might have been a good thing if he had done it. But he got outmanuevred at the end and could not pull it off.

But that was a long time ago...the area has morphed into something entirely different and is not going back to Mexico ever...No not ever.

So why not drop the nonsense?
Then you have to say that Mexico mugged (broke away from) Spain who mugged the original natives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2008, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,173,365 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Sir Francis Drake claimed California for England before the Spaniards knew California existed. You could say Spain stole California and whatever portion of that area that Drake claimed from England.
Yes.

Post 1867 Mexico's claims against our Southwest are spurious at best.

That stated: once the Mexican 'leaders' quit whining over long ago history------they can help build their country from a junk heap into a First World powerhouse.

The Irish did it

The Spanish did it.

The Italians did it.

Portugal is well on its way to affluence.

All four examples occurred in just the last 50 odd years------and, all are nominally 'Catholic' like Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2008, 02:13 PM
 
8,978 posts, read 16,571,118 times
Reputation: 3020
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Sir Francis Drake claimed California for England before the Spaniards knew California existed. You could say Spain stole California and whatever portion of that area that Drake claimed from England.
The Russians, as well, claimed California (google "Fort Ross"), built a few things here, harvested seals on the Channel Islands, etc. operating out of their base at Sitka, Alaska..i.e., "Russian America". Ever hear of the Russian River? (N. Calif.)...they once were here...

I believe Drake named California "New Albion"....and "Drakes Bay" is named for him..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2008, 12:18 AM
 
Location: OC, CA
3,309 posts, read 5,709,458 times
Reputation: 663
I concur. We took this country fair and square. The Aztlan area would not be twice as great as it is if it belonged to Mexico. Probably just a string of missions and dumpy shacks like the rest of Mexico. Then we would have a border crisis in Oklahoma and Wyoming instead of Arizona and California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 03:07 PM
 
Location: dallas,texas
1 posts, read 1,470 times
Reputation: 11
We fought for Texas and we won Texas. Mexicans need to let it go. They lost the fight. What the hell is wrong with you people. Hispanic Americans helped fight to win Texas as an independent state so whatever. and another thing Hispanic Americans have a tendency to forget that they are not Mexican but American. What’s up with that? sorry for getting a little of topic.
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 04:39 PM
 
355 posts, read 1,480,774 times
Reputation: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaBear View Post
If if were not the White Euros; the group that could have subjugated the New World could have been the Japanese----------or, even the Chinese.

Hell; had the Aztecs and/or Incas taken a different path in history----------they might have gone to Europe, Africa, etc. instead of being defeated by the Spanish.
HAHAHA, yeah right to that second part. There is virtually no difference intellectually/intelligence-wise, between the native peoples you see today (the native Amerindians/Mestizos of the Americas) and their primitive ancestors. The native Amerindian and Mestizos are a 1300 AD agrarian society at best. This is where the bulk of the "culture clash" comes from - the mentalities, thoughts, ideas of these peoples are quite primitive. Not saying they lack mental capacity or ability, but rather, it is the lack of education, illiteracy, and the disregard of the importance of education, which keeps them in this "peon" state.

To even suggest the slightest possibility that any one of the various uncivilized tribes of the Americas would have been capable of crossing the Atlantic, with virtually no islands to hop across as with the Pacific, is absurd.

Perhaps they would have been able to, given another 2,000 or so years of development. Even if they could with their primitive canoes, to what purpose? Are you suggesting they could take on any of the European fleets with blow darts, spears, and bows and arrows?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 04:42 PM
 
355 posts, read 1,480,774 times
Reputation: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreabeth View Post
Why not? My ancestors, the Vikings, were in North America around 1000 AD. Maybe if those of us of Scandinavian descent rise up and DEMAND the return of our lands I could get some nice waterfront property on Long Island or something.
Nope, not Long Island. But waterfront property in Nova Scotia/Newfoundland, definitely. Maybe some in Maine as well, but that would be the best you could hope for, LOL. You should get some petitions going at the UN, or maybe the Hague.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top