Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I seem to recall that Fauci has proclaimed at one time, masks weren't necessary, then later changed his stance. That, is plainly obvious. Later on, I believe that he was wearing two masks!!
Fauci now claims one of the reasons he originally said masks weren't necessary is that he wanted to protect the limited supply of PPE equipment at the time. In other words, he admitted to lying for political reasons.
There are other instances where he admitted to lying to the public. I forget the details, but it had something to do with the percentage of people who need to take the vaccine in order for herd immunity to kick in. His number changed. When asked about the change he admitted to changing his estimate based on results of a public opinion poll. In other words, he created a number in an attempt to sway public opinion on a topic.
Everyone makes mistakes. However, prominent public health officials should not be intentionally lying in an attempt to force a desired outcome. Maybe he is as smart as some believe. He still does not have all the answers.
His admission of lies has permanently destroyed his credibility IMO. Think about it... as a medical professional you truly believe masks can save lives. Then you tell the public NOT to wear them because you want to save them for people you deem more worthy. That's the opposite of his oath of "First do no harm." He has become more professional politician than medical doctor.
Fauci now claims one of the reasons he originally said masks weren't necessary is that he wanted to protect the limited supply of PPE equipment at the time. In other words, he admitted to lying for political reasons.
There are other instances where he admitted to lying to the public. I forget the details, but it had something to do with the percentage of people who need to take the vaccine in order for herd immunity to kick in. His number changed. When asked about the change he admitted to changing his estimate based on results of a public opinion poll. In other words, he created a number in an attempt to sway public opinion on a topic.
Everyone makes mistakes. However, prominent public health officials should not be intentionally lying in an attempt to force a desired outcome. Maybe he is as smart as some believe. He still does not have all the answers.
His admission of lies has permanently destroyed his credibility IMO. Think about it... as a medical professional you truly believe masks can save lives. Then you tell the public NOT to wear them because you want to save them for people you deem more worthy. That's the opposite of his oath of "First do no harm." He has become more professional politician than medical doctor.
And that’s the thing, even if he stretched the truth for a good reason he can no longer be a trusted source of information. It’s not that he made a mistake, but that he didn’t tell the truth, which is a big difference.
And that’s the thing, even if he stretched the truth for a good reason he can no longer be a trusted source of information. It’s not that he made a mistake, but that he didn’t tell the truth, which is a big difference.
Well stated!
And the fact that he was pictured in a research lab with Obama, possibly even the Wuhan lab, where this virus supposedly "escaped" from, puts his credibility in question, as far as I'm concerned.
And the fact that he was pictured in a research lab with Obama, possibly even the Wuhan lab, where this virus supposedly "escaped" from, puts his credibility in question, as far as I'm concerned.
There is no conspiracy too wacky for the orange cult! Any photos of him from decades ago serving his country like a great citizen? Get a grip guy.
There is no conspiracy too wacky for the orange cult! Any photos of him from decades ago serving his country like a great citizen? Get a grip guy.
You do understand by framing everything in terms of Trump that your argument loses credibility.
6.8 million J&J vaccines given, less than 10 had blood clots, which is a lower percentage of blood clots women get from birth control. But The Fauc wants it pulled.
I am not an apologist for anyone, not Biden, Trump or Fauci. I do however, respectfully disagree with all the haters. If even one of you is perfect please step forward.
Everyone of the above has had every aspect of their lives (some of it directly relative to the job itself- others not) dissected and judged. I would challenge anyone who is in the position of having to make decisions for many people, that after the situation was over didn't find things they would do over. For these people, there is nothing but a magnifying glass. None of which does anyone good.
We all learn by our mistakes and so too will these people -once the situation is over. There was/is no precedent for how to handle this virus and therefore mistakes will be made.
99%. Minus hating on Trump of course. That's just easy regardless of his party.
You do understand by framing everything in terms of Trump that your argument loses credibility.
6.8 million J&J vaccines given, less than 10 had blood clots, which is a lower percentage of blood clots women get from birth control. But The Fauc wants it pulled.
Well stated!!
And Fauci, like everyone else, has a history......
You do understand by framing everything in terms of Trump that your argument loses credibility.
6.8 million J&J vaccines given, less than 10 had blood clots, which is a lower percentage of blood clots women get from birth control. But The Fauc wants it pulled.
CDC and FDA recommended pulling it. Fauci works for neither.
CDC and FDA recommended pulling it. Fauci works for neither.
But he’s out talking it up as Biden’s chief medical adviser.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.