Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-23-2017, 11:57 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,904,670 times
Reputation: 116153

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by silibran View Post
Your MIL should qualify for 1/2 of her husbands SS. That's the first thing.

I don't think it is fair that your wife is expected to foot the bill for an expensive funeral, when the family doesn't have the resources for that. Even if she had visited her father, I imagine she would still be asked to do this. The lack of a visit is just an excuse.

Tell the family the sum you can afford, and let them figure out the rest. Be prepared for friction in the family though. But since your wife did not visit her father when he was dying, i imagine there is already friction in the family toward her.

Decide how much you can afford to give them toward a funeral, and then do that. But you might want to arrange to pay the funeral home directly. Just sayin'.
This post and the preceding one have given me an idea. OP, since the others are looking to you to finance everything, in a way, that puts you in the driver's seat. One way to handle the situation is to simply take control; this is the "it's my money, so I'm calling the shots" approach. Just tell everyone there will be a cremation and a pot-luck memorial lunch at the funeral home. If they're not happy with it, they can pay for something else.

Call SS to find out what the widow is entitled to. Make an executive decision regarding that, such as--since she gets all or part of the deceased's SS, plus she has the disposable asset of the home, and their retirement account, announce that she can make her own decisions on how to proceed based on all those assets. End of story, and if the others don't like it, they can step in and take over on their own accounts.


Good luck. Sounds like a tough crowd, but since they've put the ball in your court, run with it. If they don't like the direction in which you're running, they're welcome to take the ball back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2017, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Northern California
130,290 posts, read 12,099,804 times
Reputation: 39037
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGab View Post
Have we received any updates from the OP?
yes, post # 120.

I would add, a pot luck at a Church hall, or even trays of sandwiches from Costco etc, would be a smarter way to go, than a fancy dinner for 100+ at a fancy restaurant. That makes no sense.


When my parents died, we did have lunch in a nice restaurant for family & close friends, but they had left enough money in the estate to cover it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,345,962 times
Reputation: 21891
I am reading these posts and wondering.

Is their a house that the parents owned? Does it have any equity in it? Could a trade be made? Could the op and spouse be placed on the home as an owner? The reason I am asking is from watching my sister and her husband. His parents were semi retired. They own a beautiful home and a couple rentals. They are also getting older. My sister and brother in law have lived with them since they got married. They bought a condo and the parents said to rent it out and keep living with them so they did. Now they have several rental properties. A year or so ago they moved into a new home that they had built in Arizona. My brother in laws parents made a deal with them. They would move in and rent out their home. Basically when they are not traveling they would have a place to stay. When they need it my sister and her husband would take care of them. In the end my sister and her husband get the home and other rentals that the parents own.

My sister can not have kids and so they figured that they would spend their life building a nice net worth. It was not hard to say yes to having the parents live with them. Also they are on track to retire in 12 years. Lets say that the parents need full time care in 12 years, then they are their for them. Either way they will take care of the parents.

Could something similar work out for the op. They pay for everything with the benefit of getting the house, that is if the house has any kind of equity or value. The other kids do not get anything out of the home or estate. Their money, their benefit. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 12:56 PM
 
3,137 posts, read 2,707,699 times
Reputation: 6097
It seems like someone is always looking at someone else's wallet. I would start setting boundaries to redefine my relationships with these family members. Because it won't end with the funeral.


I have a male friend whose wife's nieces have consistently hit him up for money, over and over again. They are young women in their early 20s. They have accused him of "neglecting his family" because he won't give them money. They have also used a family death to prey on his sympathy, hoping to get something. They have harassed him to the point where he has blocked them on social media.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 01:05 PM
 
2,053 posts, read 1,527,324 times
Reputation: 3962
Mod cut: Reply to post which has been deleted.

Funerals are for the living not the dead. If you can't afford to spend that much on a service, then don't. How are they going to make you pay for something that you don't want? You should get together as a family and decide what to spend. If no one else is willing to contribute, then the funeral will be based on your contribution. You can buy a casket from Costco. Although it has come to be expected, you don't have to feed people dinner after the service, you can have light refreshments. I would tell them that if you want me to pay, we are doing it my way- no agreements.

If you are retired, you can't support your MIL. There is no reason why she can't downsize, take in roommates or live with one of her other daughters. Their poor financial planning doesn't mean that you will pick up the slack (first it was $1000 a month, now it's $750- what's the real number?).

Last edited by PJSaturn; 01-24-2017 at 01:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 01:14 PM
 
5,046 posts, read 9,622,618 times
Reputation: 4181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
This post and the preceding one have given me an idea. OP, since the others are looking to you to finance everything, in a way, that puts you in the driver's seat. One way to handle the situation is to simply take control; this is the "it's my money, so I'm calling the shots" approach. Just tell everyone there will be a cremation and a pot-luck memorial lunch at the funeral home. If they're not happy with it, they can pay for something else.

Call SS to find out what the widow is entitled to. Make an executive decision regarding that, such as--since she gets all or part of the deceased's SS, plus she has the disposable asset of the home, and their retirement account, announce that she can make her own decisions on how to proceed based on all those assets. End of story, and if the others don't like it, they can step in and take over on their own accounts.


Good luck. Sounds like a tough crowd, but since they've put the ball in your court, run with it. If they don't like the direction in which you're running, they're welcome to take the ball back.
I like this idea. Sometimes it's hard to step way back and take a sensible look.

I also don't think the family suddenly came up with 'you have more money, you pay for it all'. I think they've been watching your income for some time.

The reason they give...your not coming to dad's deathbed....does not equate.

If you like you could add up the cost of coming to dad's deathbed and say ok since the family equates the two you'll pay that much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 02:05 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,904,670 times
Reputation: 116153
Quote:
Originally Posted by tassity22 View Post
It seems like someone is always looking at someone else's wallet. I would start setting boundaries to redefine my relationships with these family members. Because it won't end with the funeral.


I have a male friend whose wife's nieces have consistently hit him up for money, over and over again. They are young women in their early 20s. They have accused him of "neglecting his family" because he won't give them money. They have also used a family death to prey on his sympathy, hoping to get something. They have harassed him to the point where he has blocked them on social media.
Nieces? Why don't they hit up their own parents? That's outrageous! I've never heard of nieces/nephews demanding money of aunts/uncles. What's wrong with people these days?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 02:36 PM
 
3,393 posts, read 4,011,503 times
Reputation: 9310
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
I am reading these posts and wondering.

Is their a house that the parents owned? Does it have any equity in it? Could a trade be made? Could the op and spouse be placed on the home as an owner? The reason I am asking is from watching my sister and her husband. His parents were semi retired. They own a beautiful home and a couple rentals. They are also getting older. My sister and brother in law have lived with them since they got married. They bought a condo and the parents said to rent it out and keep living with them so they did. Now they have several rental properties. A year or so ago they moved into a new home that they had built in Arizona. My brother in laws parents made a deal with them. They would move in and rent out their home. Basically when they are not traveling they would have a place to stay. When they need it my sister and her husband would take care of them. In the end my sister and her husband get the home and other rentals that the parents own.

My sister can not have kids and so they figured that they would spend their life building a nice net worth. It was not hard to say yes to having the parents live with them. Also they are on track to retire in 12 years. Lets say that the parents need full time care in 12 years, then they are their for them. Either way they will take care of the parents.

Could something similar work out for the op. They pay for everything with the benefit of getting the house, that is if the house has any kind of equity or value. The other kids do not get anything out of the home or estate. Their money, their benefit. LOL
It was stated earlier that there is a reverse mortgage on the house. If this is the case, I believe they don't own the house anymore. I believe that means the mortgage company either gave the OP's parents a lump sum -or- the OP's parents get a monthly payment from the mortgage company until their death and they are allowed to live in it until their death, at which point, the mortgage company takes over the property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 02:41 PM
 
Location: SoCal again
20,764 posts, read 19,972,298 times
Reputation: 43163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curious Investor View Post
Very fancy casket, limos and a huge dinner for one hundred of his closest friends and family at a local restaurant.
That's nuts. I would offer to pay for the cheapest arrangement (cremation??) and no dinner and nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2017, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,345,962 times
Reputation: 21891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book Lover 21 View Post
It was stated earlier that there is a reverse mortgage on the house. If this is the case, I believe they don't own the house anymore. I believe that means the mortgage company either gave the OP's parents a lump sum -or- the OP's parents get a monthly payment from the mortgage company until their death and they are allowed to live in it until their death, at which point, the mortgage company takes over the property.
Sorry, I failed to read everything. I will be more diligent next time.

I guess my real thought was that if the OP were going to take the brunt of the financial pain then the Op should get a larger benefit than those not willing or not able to help out. Maybe that is selfish but families do seem to head that way when any kind of money is at stake. My thought, lay out all the cards on the table and let everyone know that you are willing to do ABC if XYZ is fullfilled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top