Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2014, 10:43 AM
 
1,714 posts, read 2,358,013 times
Reputation: 1261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIRefugee View Post
I've crossed it on foot. You get some decent views of the city you wouldn't get otherwise. That's not saying walking TO it is all that pleasant, especially on the south shore.
Yeah, I've done that a few times. Walking that part of Carson isn't exactly scenic, is it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2014, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,254,431 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
Try to get from the Northside to The West End to see how little PennDot cars about pedestrians or bikes.

Back in the day, there used to be a pretty complex system of staircases underneath the West End Circle to get people below to West Carson as well as a pedestrian island for transit riders to transfer down there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 10:54 AM
 
6,601 posts, read 8,975,035 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by WPANative View Post
I'm not surprised
I'm just surprised by how vast the disparity is. It sounds like 99% of projects don't even include crosswalks, assuming those qualify as a "pedestrian safety facility."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aqua Teen Carl View Post
Hate to sound negative but: this is Pennsylvania.

Not only is archaic planning the norm and accepted, but the usual rural vs. city "why should I pay for XYZ" applies again and again. It will spawn the same discussions and create the same divide between us.

Wouldn't be surprised if some pockets are being lined to brush aside biking and pedestrian projects as well. Again, this is Pennsylvania.
The rural vs. suburban vs. urban aspect of our state definitely comes into play here. I wish more transportation funding and decisions were kept up to local government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 10:57 AM
 
6,601 posts, read 8,975,035 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetiebelle View Post
Alternately, Pocusset St in Schenley Park was just turned into a bike/pedestrian only path: That First Ride | Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Blog
This is great. What a well done project! BikePGH really has affected a lot of change.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moby Hick View Post
Many of the city streets don't have sidewalks here. Or they only have them one side.
"Many" is a stretch, at least compared to the suburbs. The city streets without sidewalks are usually that way because they are so narrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 01:02 PM
 
4,277 posts, read 11,780,009 times
Reputation: 3933
There certainly is a difference in transportation funds programming evident in PA vs., say, NY or MD.

Sidewalks are obviously a common good - unless you are in PENNDOT. The only reason they typically have curb ramps (not sidewalks between, but curb ramps) included in a street reconstruction project is they lost a court case. Then they go and plaster "no crossing" signs all over the place at the intersections they didn't design for pedestrian passage, probably without any legal authority.

Conversely a lot of TE funds in PA go into rail trails - if you are into those, PA's are the envy of the USA. But of course then you have to get in your car and drive to, say, Confluence to use it (deliberately exaggerating for effect, yes I have seen the Hot Metal Bridge and its approaches).

Integrating trails into alternative transportation still seems to be a major blind spot. Even to many municipal site plan reviewers, they'd rather argue over hundredths of a cfs deep in a stormwater study than a commonsense sidewalk tiein at an inersection. Like, they'll make a subdivision place sidewalks on the road frontage but forget the sidewalk should actually be continuous across the subdivision entry road even if behind the entry sign.

It still hasn't occurred to the Harrisburg mandarins that sidewalks and trails are cheaper than expressway lane miles and dealing with type II diabetes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 03:32 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,727,826 times
Reputation: 17388
Pennsylvania ranks 27th of all states in the percentage of its transportation budget dedicated to bikes and pedestrians, which is higher than the following states:


- California
- Colorado
- New Jersey
- New York
- Vermont
- Washington


So if Pennsylvania is "backwards" for not investing enough in bikes or pedestrians, then what's that say about the states I listed that are all supposedly more "enlightened"? By the way, calling Pennsylvania "backwards" is so trite and cliche.

For that matter, it's not PennDOT's responsibility to include sidewalks in residential subdivisions; that's up the the developers and the local municipal government. Talk about barking up the wrong tree.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ki0eh View Post
It still hasn't occurred to the Harrisburg mandarins that sidewalks and trails are cheaper than expressway lane miles and dealing with type II diabetes.
On that note, expressway lane miles are cheaper than rail lines, so I guess we shouldn't invest in rail lines either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:51 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,957,812 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
Pennsylvania ranks 27th of all states in the percentage of its transportation budget dedicated to bikes and pedestrians, which is higher than the following states:


- California
- Colorado
- New Jersey
- New York
- Vermont
- Washington


So if Pennsylvania is "backwards" for not investing enough in bikes or pedestrians, then what's that say about the states I listed that are all supposedly more "enlightened"? By the way, calling Pennsylvania "backwards" is so trite and cliche.
I know Colorado and Washington state have 100 times our infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians. That being said, CO and WA might not have to spend as much anymore due to them having it in place already.

This thread is about PennDot and people are bringing up what Pittsburgh is doing with BikePGH and such. There is a difference in the state view of this and the city view. Pittsburgh is doing better, but I would say PennDot doesn't understand why anyone would ever ride a bike anywhere. I will say PennDot DID remove a sign that was in the middle of a sidewalk on the Highland Park Bridge after a complaint was filed. I was pretty excited they even listened at all. I am still in shock they moved the sign. Maybe they would listen a little? I just have so little confidence in them, but one never knows what the future holds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2014, 07:48 AM
 
1,445 posts, read 1,971,575 times
Reputation: 1190
PennDot puts signs totally blocking the sidewalks around here every summer when they're detouring one of the highways. Drives me crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 08:32 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,957,812 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
PennDot puts signs totally blocking the sidewalks around here every summer when they're detouring one of the highways. Drives me crazy.
If you are running Windows, you can fill out a complaint. Someone filled out a complaint regarding a sign in the middle of the Highland Park Bridge sidewalk and BOOM PennDot relocated it. Of course they still plow all the snow onto the sidewalk, which includes bumper parts, glass, shock absorbers, used drug needles and whatever else on the sides of our roadways, but I digress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 08:41 AM
 
Location: About 10 miles north of Pittsburgh International
2,458 posts, read 4,202,032 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:

Of course they still plow all the snow onto the sidewalk,
Where would you put it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top