Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
not really true boozes is a drug and if your addicted causes you tremurs drugs do cause damage to you physically but in your mind it is true but you cant just stop it becomes completely involved around it people dont sell there body for nothing
Alcohol, just like nicotine, causes physical addiction.
Now, if you really want to throw someone who uses the "marijuana isn't physically addictive" for a loop, bring up the fact that Meth isn't physically addictive either.
However, the physical side effects of meth use is so bad, its hardly comparable to cannibus usage.
Why should it be 21? So I could buy cancer causing tobacco products at 18 but not marijuana?
And even if they did legalize it and make the age 21, there would be a shift in arrests of undeage drinking, to underage smoking.
I get 21+ year olds to get my beer, and that's probably what would happen with weed. Why not make it 18 to eliminate this whole problem?
Marijuana doesn't have to be smoked, it can be vaporized and/or eaten. Either of which doesn't allow for the harsh inhaling of plant matter, which is known to cause cancer in some people.
Of course, Eggs have shown to increase cancer risks in some people to, but I don't see people wanting to outlaw them.
Alcohol, just like nicotine, causes physical addiction.
Now, if you really want to throw someone who uses the "marijuana isn't physically addictive" for a loop, bring up the fact that Meth isn't physically addictive either.
However, the physical side effects of meth use is so bad, its hardly comparable to cannibus usage.
meth is addictive. Again, these drugs promote addiction and craving through activation of dopaminergic pathways, which is thier mutally shared pharmcologic action, independent of their specific receptor related actions.
Marijuana doesn't have to be smoked, it can be vaporized and/or eaten. Either of which doesn't allow for the harsh inhaling of plant matter, which is known to cause cancer in some people.
Of course, Eggs have shown to increase cancer risks in some people to, but I don't see people wanting to outlaw them.
That is news to me. Since when have eggs become carcinogenic?
Marijuana doesn't have to be smoked, it can be vaporized and/or eaten. Either of which doesn't allow for the harsh inhaling of plant matter, which is known to cause cancer in some people.
Of course, Eggs have shown to increase cancer risks in some people to, but I don't see people wanting to outlaw them.
I don't use a vape, or make hash brownies, etc. And marijuana is proven to also help prevent cancer.
Alcohol, just like nicotine, causes physical addiction.
Now, if you really want to throw someone who uses the "marijuana isn't physically addictive" for a loop, bring up the fact that Meth isn't physically addictive either.
However, the physical side effects of meth use is so bad, its hardly comparable to cannibus usage.
...but...marijuana isn't physically addicting...
Far to many people put marijuana in the same group as meth, cocaine, etc, which shouldn't be done. There is a huge difference between enjoying an herb than shooting up something that was created with a bunch of dangerous chemicals in someones basement...
Far to many people put marijuana in the same group as meth, cocaine, etc, which shouldn't be done. There is a huge difference between enjoying an herb than shooting up something that was created with a bunch of dangerous chemicals in someones basement...
Couldn't agree more.
Its just that your previous post made it sound like you were saying alcohol isn't physically addictive, when in fact it is.
THC is attached to the CB1 and CB2 receptors in the brain. Neither of which are linked to physical addiction.
Its just that your previous post made it sound like you were saying alcohol isn't physically addictive, when in fact it is.
THC is attached to the CB1 and CB2 receptors in the brain. Neither of which are linked to physical addiction.
I apoligize if I said something to make you think that I don't believe that alcohol is physically addicting. Believe me alcoholism runs in my family, I know for a fact it's addictive.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
