Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And you might not understand that Obama's comments are both irrelevant and inadmissible hearsay.
But don't let little facts like this get in the way of your hopelessly partisan Obama bashing attempts.
Go ahead, tell that to the guy at Politico who reported it.
I really don't know why some of you attribute articles posted in links to the poster who posted them. So I take it they object and try to make it personal when someone posts articles, news stories they don't particularly care for or want to hear.
See, even the some in the MSM noticed the "story" didn't jibe with the facts.
President Obama’s dramatic news at last night’s memorial service in Tucson that Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ has just minutes before opened her left eye for the first time since the shooting has created some confusion in light of news from doctors that Giffords “could open her eyes” on Sunday.
It is true that some of the left has done that. It is also true that some on the right have reacted very defensively. One wonders, why be so defensive if they don't feel they, to some extent, inappropriately inflamed people?
When someone is metaphorically tossing around gasoline and lighting people on fire, its only natural that they try and put out the flames. Accusing someone of having blood on their hands, or, as Olberman did, accuse republicans and their supporters.
"It is essential tonight, not to demand revenge, but to demand justice, to insist, not upon payback against those politicians and commentators who have so irresponsibly brought us to this time of domestic terrorism, but to change the minds of them and their supporters. To make sure by peaceful means, that those politicians and commentators and supporters, have no further place in our system of government."
Does anyone know who made and paid for those Together We Thrive t-shirts? I have not been able to find any information on them. If indeed this was the sole decision and vision of the U of A, it was genuinely ill advised.
"A person familiar with the event confirmed the university put the event together, and was responsible for t-shirts, tickets, fliers, etc."
UNLESS Obama is called as a witness in the case and appears in court, it's an out of court statement presented for the truth of the matter asserted...which IS HEARSAY.
And it qualifies for no exception to the Hearsay Rule that I can think of.
UNLESS Obama is called as a witness in the case and appears in court, it's an out of court statement presented for the truth of the matter asserted...which IS HEARSAY.
And it qualifies for no exception to the Hearsay Rule that I can think of.
And you don't think his lawyers would do that - or call the sheriff as well for the out of line statements he has made?
And if Obama had done anything else, no matter what, you would be disgusted by that too.
Because it is Obama. No other reason is necessary for you.
The hats, shirts, and wildly inappropriate 0bama supporters at this rally may have tainted 0bama a bit too. BTW, where did the idea for the completely inappropriate slogan-emblazoned shirts and hats come from any way?
The hats, shirts, and wildly inappropriate 0bama supporters at this rally may have tainted 0bama a bit too. BTW, where did the idea for the completely inappropriate slogan-emblazoned shirts and hats come from any way?
The university (see post #658).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.