Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2011, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
But you only counted the cost for FUEL - not the true cost for the trip by automobile.

The True Cost of Driving

(direct costs estimate)
500 miles x $.99 per mile = $495
(indirect costs estimate)
500 miles x $1.39 per mile = $695

{A typical car owner spends around $5000 to $17000 per year to "support" his car habit. That breaks down to roughly $14/day on the low side, and $46.50/day on the high side. }
oh please

my 1994 chevy barretta gets 30 miles to the gallon..insurance is only 100 a month, and it costs nothing to operate other than gas/oil....the car NEW was only 12k...and I can carry 4-5 people in the car...the train price was PER PERSON
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh please

my 1994 chevy barretta gets 30 miles to the gallon..insurance is only 100 a month, and it costs nothing to operate other than gas/oil....the car NEW was only 12k...and I can carry 4-5 people in the car...the train price was PER PERSON
Most of my colleagues in NYC lived where public transportation is convenient. Their transportation burden to commute was far lower than it would be with cars. Some of them didn't have to buy a car (I wouldn't either). Even when visiting, I choose not to drive in NYC. To travel around, or in the north east, it is ALWAYS trains.

The only thing that stops me from using trains in Dallas-Houston-San Antonio/Austin triangle is lack of proper service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
Amtrak ridership hit a new record last year, without any new high speed trains under some of the worst economic conditions in a lifetime. And critics claimed nobody would ride the trains.
and yet it runs a 1-2 BILLION dollar DEFICIT year over year

Subsidies to Amtrak were supposed to be temporary after it was created in 1970. That has not occurred, and Amtrak has provided second-rate rail service for more than 30 years while consuming more than $100 billion in federal subsidies. It has a poor on-time record, and its infrastructure is in bad shape.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Most of my colleagues in NYC lived where public transportation is convenient. Their transportation burden to commute was far lower than it would be with cars. Some of them didn't have to buy a car (I wouldn't either). Even when visiting, I choose not to drive in NYC. To travel around, or in the north east, it is ALWAYS trains.
and most of my family that lives in brooklyn and manhatten is the same

when I worked in manhatten it made sense too...but I now work in queens and live in the island...my jobs is 12 miles dooor to door...it is CHEAPER , QUICKER and more convient to drive...the rail would take 2-3 times as long ...a 3 mile drive (or bike) to the station...then wait for a late over full train to get to jamaca, then a transfer to flushing, then a sub way, then a bus to finally get to work 2.5 hours later.....no thanks..and the monthly LIRR ticket is over 350 dollars..not counting the subway or bus fairs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and most of my family that lives in brooklyn and manhatten is the same

when I worked in manhatten it made sense too...but I now work in queens and live in the island...my jobs is 12 miles dooor to door...it is CHEAPER , QUICKER and more convient to drive...the rail would take 2-3 times as long ...a 3 mile drive (or bike) to the station...then wait for a late over full train to get to jamaca, then a transfer to flushing, then a sub way, then a bus to finally get to work 2.5 hours later.....no thanks..and the monthly LIRR ticket is over 350 dollars..not counting the subway or bus fairs
Well, then the train is not for you, just as driving isn't an option considered by your family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,338,959 times
Reputation: 2250
Mass transit gets large government subsidies. Tolls for bridges and tunnels also fund mass transit. Amtrak is funded by the Government. That is enough money for rails. Americans like to be free. We want to jump in our cars(suvs) and go anywhere, not just where the government rails will let us go. And who wants to ride in public transportation anymore than they have to. People may be sneezing and coughing right next to you or yelling into their cell phones. Highways give us freedom. What would happen to the auto industry with the expansion of rails. We HAD to bail them out because they were so important to the economy. No, this is just another tree hugger proposal to lessen the use of fossil fuels. They don't care how much money it loses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,981 posts, read 22,172,656 times
Reputation: 13811
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
FWIW- the New York Central provided scheduled 90 mph passenger trains from Buffalo, NY to Chicago in 1895 so 19th century thinking is not so out of place. We could afford a national HSR system if we stopped wasting money on pacifying the Middle East or keeping drug prices high with the War on Drugs. The money could easily build a rail system as well as pay down the debt.
But, since passenger trains are so expensive to operate, all of us taxpayers would be paying for the HSR, right? Even people who would never use it would have to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,981 posts, read 22,172,656 times
Reputation: 13811
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
FWIW- the New York Central provided scheduled 90 mph passenger trains from Buffalo, NY to Chicago in 1895 so 19th century thinking is not so out of place. We could afford a national HSR system if we stopped wasting money on pacifying the Middle East or keeping drug prices high with the War on Drugs. The money could easily build a rail system as well as pay down the debt.
But, since passenger trains are so expensive to operate, all of us taxpayers would be paying for the HSR, right? Even people who would never use it would have to pay for it.

My guess is the people polled for this survey would personally benefit from HSR, but what about the people like me, who never travel to the big city? I'd never use the expensive passenger train, but I'd be forced to subsidize it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
But, since passenger trains are so expensive to operate, all of us taxpayers would be paying for the HSR, right? Even people who would never use it would have to pay for it.
So are airlines and airports. And roads. But then, oil is something we have managed to get for cheap... cheaper than pennies, by sacrificing our military, instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,811,485 times
Reputation: 24863
I don't use the US military but most of my taxes fund our adventures in Afghanistan.

FWIW - I have a conceptual design for a HS system that would connect NYC to Chicago in 4 hours or less as well as transport freight at about the same speed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top