Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
REALITY check for liberals. If you NEED tax payer assistance to survive, then you aren't worth the oxygen you're breathing. What would you do if there was no more taxpayer assistance? Die? Well, maybe we should just cut out the middle step, save me some tax dollars, and call it good.
What about the children that require tax dollars to survive? You know, the children that weren't aborted. Children that used to be fetuses..........ya know, those innocent, little organisms that conservatives love sooooo much?
The conservative mantra: "Save a fetus today, so we can let it starve tomorow."
You pay for it because you SHOULD be paying for it. And you're going to KEEP paying for it. These children are your fellow Americans. Why shouldn't you pay? If you think it's thievery, then tough! Too bad. And i hope they get free breakfast too...on yours and my tax dollar. Stop feeding foreigners first, then we can discuss how to cut off Americans.
Okay, comrade.
I am also against foreign aid. There you go with your asinine assumptions again.
Quote:
So ok....you aren't for war spending. Make your case then.....we spend around 700 billion on defense. How much should we cut? And since you're so definitive about cutting lunch for your own citizens, i wanna see how definitive you are about cutting money for bombs and bullets and reconstruction projects in Afghanistan.
I don't know enough about defense spending to be saying what we should and should not cut. I'm generally a pacifist, I even get upset when my husband watches UFC on TV.
It's so funny, you always think you have me figured out, you have put me and all conservatives into this little box but you always end up laughably wrong in your ASSumptions.
Then maybe you should rethink what you're repeating instead of repeating again in bold?
You can help the poor on your own right now. Anyone can. Yet poor go unhelped. If personal charity within the bounds of human selfishness were enough, the problem would be solved already.
The poor go unhelped b/c people think welfare is enough. That is what I was saying. I don't need to rethink anything, you need to get a grip and consider what I said instead of just poo-pooing it.
What about the children that require tax dollars to survive? You know, the children that weren't aborted. Children that used to be fetuses..........ya know, those innocent, little organisms that conservatives love sooooo much?
The conservative mantra: "Save a fetus today, so we can let it starve tomorow."
Liberal libbers motto: "Practice sexual irresponsibility today so we can murder a baby in utero tomorrow; then, do it all over again as often as convenient."
Despite what Progressives think, government will never replace the family unit successfully. The shortcomings of the ideology that government can replace one or both parents and any personal responsibility is playing our today before our eyes. Get a clue!
Gynocologits are considered specialists and charge more than GP's for office calls, and there are expensive lab tests required before BCP's will be prescribed, FYI.
If you had read some of the previous posts, {from women, who would know} you would have known that.
Love it when people talk about things they obviously know nothing about.
Maybe he was reading what I said, since I call BS on your claim.
You do know that there are poor people out there that can barely pay their rent and utilities, don't you? People that live paycheck to paycheck with nothing to spare.
You can't assume others can afford the cost of a doctor's visit, just because YOU can.
Asking some people to come up with approx. $400 to visit a gyno and pay for required testing is equivalent to asking others to come up with $15,000......they just don't HAVE it.
They have a year to save. They should get on that.
Here is one of the main problems with conservatives. They live in some type of fairyland where they actually think people are going to STOP HAVING SEX.
The fact that conservatives are so totally out of touch with REALITY, is the reason they cannot come up with VIABLE solutions to a problem.
If we eliminated the possibility of abortion, don't you think that would deter some of these people from having sex willy nilly?
Talk about being out of touch with reality. Remove the escape hatch and suddenly, the reality of the situation becomes so much more apparent.
So what will happen to millions of elderly in Nursing Homes who have "spent down " to zero and are on Medicaid. I hope the Tea Party will take them in when the Nursing Homes kick them ouit
If there is no moral compass or generosity of spirit, then she should do it gladly out of her own self interest. There is a point where too many people with nothing to lose become very destructive and very costly....as these unloved, poorly nourished, poorly educated children grow into teens and adults.
Who are you? I've never seen you on here and yet you are talking about me? Wow.
Again, conservatives are all about personal responsibility, not stealing tax dollars from the rich to fund assorted options to take care of the poor who refuse to act like responsible human beings. It has nothing to do with morals or generosity...as conservatives contribute more to non-profits than liberals do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.