Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you have pain and it takes away the pain, technically that is medicating the pain. Regardless of what medical properties marijuana has, it is stupid to make a plant illegal.
I still don't understand why folks can't get it through their thick ass heads that outlawing a natural plant is as stupid as stupid gets.
Location: Currently I physically reside on the 3rd planet from the sun
2,220 posts, read 1,878,581 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter
I still don't understand why folks can't get it through their thick ass heads that outlawing a natural plant is as stupid as stupid gets.
A gang of outlaw cannabis and their buds went on a violent crime spree today. Local authorities believe these incidents are not random but an organized effort to bring down society as we know it by Powerful Hemp Crime Lords.
Sherriff Sam said today, "We'll get these varmints! No group of plants are going to get away with crumbling society on my watch!"
Have anything factual to support that? For instance, why is it we hear so many chemo patients state marijuana both gives them an appetite and calms nausea like no other medication?
They say it because they like to get high. Offer them pot where THC has been removed, and they'd be using something else for the pain. Now, if the question was about patient's right to get high if that makes them happier, then we could have a serious point, but to sell pot as a medicine which cannot be replaced by something else is bogus.
I still don't understand why folks can't get it through their thick ass heads that outlawing a natural plant is as stupid as stupid gets.
It's beyond stupid. I can understand outlawing crack or meth, but a plant that grow naturally in all 50 states? If we are going to get into the business of outlawing plants, why not poison ivy? That makes more sense.
It's beyond stupid. I can understand outlawing crack or meth, but a plant that grow naturally in all 50 states? If we are going to get into the business of outlawing plants, why not poison ivy? That makes more sense.
Very good point! I mean after all if you burn it, and inhale any of the vapors it can kill you!
They say it because they like to get high. Offer them pot where THC has been removed, and they'd be using something else for the pain. Now, if the question was about patient's right to get high if that makes them happier, then we could have a serious point, but to sell pot as a medicine which cannot be replaced by something else is bogus.
So they catch a buzz? Big deal. Nice perk when you're suffering. And everything else has a lot more serious side-effects, and potential for abuse or overdose. You cannot overdose on pot, but you can on just about every OTHER substance legal or illegal! Given the choice I'll settle for a buzz and the munchies with no other adverse side-effects over the other synthetic crap out there thank you very much.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pun intended
