Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But for a lot of blacks and other minorities, whites are a negative thing. Past, present, future, no matter.
And they've got terms for us that are A-OK, apparently.
"Honky" always sounds kinda funny, but it's a negative. Same with "whitey."
"Cracker"
"White trash"
"Wigger"
"Gringo" is a commonly-slung-around negative from many illustrious Hispanics.
There are no negatives for whites?
Who is pretending to be stupid now?
And again, Hussein is his middle name.
If he does things to cause people to believe he sympathizes with a certain cult that
wishes to blow its own members up along with us, well, that's not my fault.
White trash, yes, I have read that occasionally. But I don't remember reading any of the others you mentioned.
Moderators reflect society. Of course negative terms for minorities are more problematic because of the past. Just like in real life. There is increased sensitivity.
Why does he deserve to be called Hussein? (As if anyone critical of Bush ever called him 'Walker Bush' or just 'Walker' ) Let's see, he carries on the wars in Muslim countries and goes to church, he must be a hidden Muslim
White trash, yes, I have read that occasionally. But I don't remember reading any of the others you mentioned.
Moderators reflect society. Of course negative terms for minorities are more problematic because of the past. Just like in real life. There is increased sensitivity.
(1)Why does he deserve to be called Hussein? (As if anyone critical of Bush ever called him 'Walker Bush' or just 'Walker' )
(2) Let's see, he carries on the wars in Muslim countries and goes to church, he must be a hidden Muslim
Determining whether this forum leans "left" or "right"
A lot of people believe this forum leans right, particularly on the "left" side. Some posters on the "right" are arguing that the forum leans "left" based on voter participation.
Rather, I thought I would go through some threads on here and see how many posts lean "right," lean "left," or fit neither category. I am outlining the rules here (mostly to make everybody despise me):
A post leans "right" if it meets one the following criteria:
-Bashes Obama or any other Democrats
-Praises any Republican
-Makes negative remarks about any group of people (based on race, religion, sexual orientation) except for white people, straight people, and Christians
-Makes positive remarks specifically towards white people, straight people, or Christians
-Follows a strong American exceptionalism approach
-Against gun control
-Against taxes, redistribution of wealth, socialism, communism, etc.
A post leans "left" if it meets one of the following criteria:
-Bashes current Republican presidential candidates, George W. Bush, or any other Republicans
-Praises any Democrat
-Makes negative remarks about white people or Christians
-Makes positive remarks about any other group of people, particularly minorities, religious minorities (particularly Muslims, eastern religions, and agnostic/atheists), and LGBT people
-Follows a more cosmopolitan international approach
-For gun control
-In favor of more taxes for the wealthy, against the rich, big business, etc.
That post is a democratic (lower case, as is being able to vote for) poll. This post is a cbmsu01 dictatorship!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.