Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2011, 02:24 PM
Ony
 
16 posts, read 9,818 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

That company has been in trouble before but the workers have rallied together and brought the company out of trouble and making profits.

What do they get in return? Their jobs being shipped off for cheaper labor in third world countries.

All heil the capitalists!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2011, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,947,214 times
Reputation: 5932
Retail sellers currently all raising their prices 10% across the board to account for rising prices in manufacturing abroad, LOL.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 03:33 PM
 
Location: San Jose
1,862 posts, read 2,386,929 times
Reputation: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Just so you know, your first cite is from 2008, and has nothing to add to the discussion about the 2011 negotiation. Your second cite simply is a re-wording of the original link.

The axle-company says that they didn't ask for workers to take a pay cut, and they did propose moving some of the production line from Mexico to Buffalo.

Unless you can tell us specifically what the union wanted and what concessions the company wanted, then I stand by my contention that the union did the workers a disservice. The union overestimated its leverage, and underestimated the company's willingness to close its doors. Now those workers will be joining the ranks of the unemployed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
The pay concessions agreed to three years ago does have something to do with the negotiations in 2011, but here's a link to an article from July 2011.
And it depends on who you believe---the company or the union---as to whether or not AA offered to bring back work they'd sent to Mexico or if they were negotiating to lower wages. The company never had an intentions of keeping the plant open--and that relates back to the contract 3 years ago when they were asking for pay cuts to $11.00 and the fact that lower trucks sales these past few year had left them with less work for that plant---they were not bargaining in good faith what so ever.
What she said....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,935,082 times
Reputation: 16265
Unions really need to rethink their strategies going forward. Are they helping to create and preserve jobs or are they trying to keep themselves relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Allowing the "Free Trade" really has been a devastating to the American economy as losing a major war. A steel mill scrapped because Korean steel is cheaper is just a destroyed as if it were bombed by terrorists. We need to wake up to the fact that our trading "partners" are our competitors and NOT our friends. They would be just as happy if we went away commercially so long as we paid for their defense against their enemies. Time to say Fair prices or you pay for your own defense.

We need FAIR Trade, not unfair trade that is robbing us of any semblance of previous prosperity. I would rather the Union workers, along with most of the rest of us, be the winners. The executives, stockholders and bankers have already stolen enough.
But you only want YOUR version of fair trade.
The US has a high COL compared to other countries.
Everyone globally can't be making what US unions make per hour.


As globalization takes hold third world countries will rise in their standard of living and wages while first world countries lower their standard of living. The only problem with that is that the cost of living in these first world countries is not getting lowered with salaries. The products we buy, use and eat are actually going up, not down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:49 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
We have had trade tariffs, well before and well after this nation was independent from England.

Since the 1930's, they have slowly been lowered and lowered... Until NAFTA and the China free trade act Clinton signed.

Notice the timeline of when the jobs really started to accelerate out of this nation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 06:09 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
And this isn't a union problem??? How is that? How can we compete in the world and still have the highest wages in the modern world? That whole thought process is a damn oxymoron!
Unions are a problem. But even without Unions, you can't be wage competitive in the US with the Indians and Chinese and still afford food and shelter here. The math just doesnt work...it's not even close. THAT'S the whole crux of the problem for us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 06:17 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,977,520 times
Reputation: 7315
Wrong, ambient. There is a cost to ship stuff 8,000 miles, and JIt is not possible either. We still make tons of stuff, but more and more, its shifted to RTW.

These idiots will regret their vote 12 months from now, when 9 of 10 are unemployed still.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 06:28 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,417,672 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Unions support illegal immigration they think it will increase their membership rolls.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 06:30 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Wrong, ambient. There is a cost to ship stuff 8,000 miles, and JIt is not possible either. We still make tons of stuff, but more and more, its shifted to RTW.

These idiots will regret their vote 12 months from now, when 9 of 10 are unemployed still.
I can assure you as a person who does strategic financial planning for a large company that has shipped lots of labor into low-cost geos... the difference in pay per head is several orders of magnitude lower. And we are not unionized. We have to ship all over the world anyways regardless of where the work is actually done. Do some research on typical going rates in the last few years for outsourced manufacturing and IT labor in India and China...it will be eye opening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top