Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:00 PM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,961,139 times
Reputation: 2326

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyndsong71 View Post
The original intent of that was too keep the US from having a "Church" like the "Church of England". It was to keep the government from making laws to say what religion was "right" and what was "wrong".

What's happening of late is stupid though and has little if nothing to do with Separation of Church & State. Having christmas decorations or parties at school do not equal "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". In fact saying that you can't celebrate christmas on school grounds or pray there, etc. is closer to what the constitution is trying to keep from happening!
To be clear there is absolutely no restriction on an individual praying in school or in any government building. That is violation of your right of free exercise. Conversely, your kid's second grade teacher cannot lead the class in facing Mecca for daily prayers.

 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,187 posts, read 995,806 times
Reputation: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
To be clear there is absolutely no restriction on an individual praying in school or in any government building. That is violation of your right of free exercise. Conversely, your kid's second grade teacher cannot lead the class in facing Mecca for daily prayers.
A teacher leading the class in prayer, is completely different from leading prayer before a football game.

in the first instance the child/person is a captive audience with no choice in the matter. The second everyone has the choice to be there or not, to participate in the prayer or not.

As a parent, and non-Christian, I would be PISSED at the first... and it wouldn't matter one bit to me with the second. In fact... been there done that. When my sons and I are someplace and someone starts a prayer (of any kind that does not belong to our religion) we simple bow our heads out of respect and in silence.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:08 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,285,615 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
There is a big move to interpret Freedom of Religion, to mean Freedom from Religion.

What was the original intent?


Is this helping or hurting the USA?
It was freedom from government involvement in people practicing their religion.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:09 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,780,658 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyndsong71 View Post
What difference does it make if you follow no religion? No one is FORCING you to follow a religion! Who does that make any sense at all to what I was saying?
If you aren't forced to follow a religion, you have the freedom from religion. We're not talking about atheists having to deal with their Christian neighbor putting up a Christmas tree.

Quote:
and how exactly does the 14th amendment have ANYTHING to do with this conversation?
You stated Congress shall make no law... It includes the States, not just Congress.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:09 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,135,035 times
Reputation: 3241
Also, lest we forget, for decades the government could just ignore people whose rights it violated, thanks to the lack of mechanisms for them to actually get into court. Now we have civil rights legislation that enables people to hold the government accountable.

Before that, not nearly as much got challenged in any serious way. Even the courts condoned awful abuses of civil rights in decisions like Plessy v. Ferguson and Buck v. Bell.

How anyone can think that things have not improved since then is beyond my comprehension.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:21 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,511,514 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
So atheists are afforded no freedoms since they don't follow a religion? And FYI, the entire Bill of Rights was incorporated into the States with the passing of the 14th Amendment. And I assure you, you should be dang glad that happened.
You inadvertently offer great evidence that the 'original intent' was Not to keep religion out of gov't..

The 14th amendment wasn't adopted until 1868 and it took roughly 80 years after that before the SC applied the establishment clause to the states. A bunch of states even had state religions after the Constitution. There's so much historical evidence that the original intent wasn't to separate gov't. and religion, only total ideologues would argue otherwise.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,485,034 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
It's both. You can't be free to exercise your choice of religion if you can't also be free from religion.
This is true, unfortunately our founders didn't choose their words as carefully as they could've.

Rather than "freedom of" or "freedom from" religion, I wish we'd have anticipated the French revolutionaries and called for "universal liberty of conscience" so there would be no casuistry later, as there is in America.
 
Old 12-08-2011, 11:43 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post

You stated Congress shall make no law... It includes the States, not just Congress.

The Constitution is the Chains on the Federal Government. It is not the power of the Federal Government.
 
Old 12-09-2011, 12:13 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
There is a big move to interpret Freedom of Religion, to mean Freedom from Religion.


What was the original intent?



Is this helping or hurting the USA?
If you have freedom of religion, you must also have freedom from religion or else the principle is fundamentally hypocritical.
 
Old 12-09-2011, 12:23 AM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,951,112 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by allenk893 View Post
Yes. We are in the last days. Jesus is coming back and he says in the Bible it would all be like this before he returned. The liberal agenda is a very calculated and specific plan that Satan used on the romans. He updated it to make it suit this generation and look how he has used them to destroy this country in almost every way. Very sad. There's really no hope. America's people now mostly hate God. We should be looking to Heaven now in these days. He is coming back to get us and he will take us home.
Allen, do you know how much that sounds like a crazy homeless man talking to himself on a street corner?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top