Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:47 AM
 
8,635 posts, read 9,144,630 times
Reputation: 5992

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
She LOVES her HMO. Nice clean waiting rooms and being able to see your doctor at your appointment time. I have a PPO plan and would rather go back to Kaiser.
If you both are in your upper 30s, seriously think about ditching your HMO. If not now, in the next couple of years. Don't say someone didn't warn you if one of you get sick, really sick and the insurance bounces you around from one (Kieser doctor) to the next until you go away, die or lose the job----lose the coverage...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:48 AM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,668,560 times
Reputation: 9399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Thinker View Post
That was the days when it really was insurance.

The insurance is just that, pooled insurance. If everyone had to pay for their own health "care", those that used it just once or twice would be bankrupt. Once you price out a knee surgery, or many other normal procedures, you'll quickly see how much it costs.

I doubt that all but a small percentage of younger people could afford the costs of delivering a baby, much less all the prenatal visits that go along with it.

I agree. With the way medical visits cost, it's just super expensive. I remember, even in the 1970s, that I could go to my GP and the cost for the office visit was $25. This was not a co-pay as they didn't have those then. This was the charge. For something simple as a sore throat. My parents had insurance then; however, even if that hadn't, with their salaries as a bank employee and a police officer, they didn't have a problem paying that.

My last bill to see my GP was $176. I had no tests run. That's his charge for a "moderate" visit (not brief, not extended). I dunno--that seems excessive for the 15 minutes I was there. I now he's smart, I know his costs are high, I know he's educated but the simple fact is that most "average" people don't readily have this sort of money laying around. It's not a big deal if you only go once every few years (like me), but some people need to go several times a year.

Medical costs are not affordable. I can't even imagine someone, these days, being able to pay for a hospital birth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,763,058 times
Reputation: 41381
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Haha... your ceiling for what you qualify as average shows you're not average. I wouldn't be surprised if you & your wife's disposable income is more than many Americans' salary/wages.

It's easy to talk about priorities when you when you have enough disposable income that sacrificing going out a couple of times a month is enough to cover a private plan.

But what if you don't? What if you've got a kid and make $40k? I'd love to see all the luxuries someone like that has to give up to find an extra $700-1000/MONTH to pay for insurance.
I make $25k and basically an extra 700-100 is giving up rent, electricity, gas, food, all that stuff I don't need.

I love how those who say good health is priceless usually have the deepest pockets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:51 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,138,171 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Damn right it was. People died from serious injuries (such as a broken back, for instance), instead of living in pain for 30 or 40 years, doped up on 15 kinds of "pain medication" and spending their lives as spaced-out semi-invalids on "disability". People who contracted diseases either survived because they were strong, and had a strong immune system, or they died. Now days, we keep every pathetic invalid alive so that the American medical system can prosper financially regardless of the quality of life that the person has.

I am all for getting back to "survival of the species mentality". Newsflash, sometimes people die, it's all part of the plan.

20yrsinBranson
I like it!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:56 AM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,148,408 times
Reputation: 22695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Reader View Post
Yeah...another newsflash: I don't think you're going to get that on the political platform of anyone to the left of Vlad Tepes.

As a species, we've been doing our best to get away from that for the last ten thousand years, and its been a roaring success.
Really?

New US Diabetes Rate Up 90 Percent in Past Decade | Diabetes Forecast Magazine

http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/con...spc-032011.pdf (United States 577,190 cancer deaths in 2011).

Drug deaths now outnumber traffic fatalities in U.S., Times analysis shows - Los Angeles Times

Positively STELLAR success, that's for certain... LOL

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:58 AM
 
1,458 posts, read 1,399,340 times
Reputation: 787
An awful lot of people lack the perspective of modern times, still protected from reality by an employer's health plan. Many young people never thought about it until politicians and activists made it such a big deal.

When I see the conflict amongst conservatives I am always reminded of the Terry Shiavo case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 11:59 AM
 
1,230 posts, read 1,040,065 times
Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
That is because people with uncurable illnesses want medical delivery industry to spend millions of dollars to prolong the life of people who are going to die anyway. Give them something to manage the pain and send them home to their family.
On the other hand big ticket diseases are favored by providers. Institutions and physicians advertise their "state of the art" treatments. Heart disease, cancer, and diabetes with all it's ramifications, as well as dialysis are all top of the line on the sales floor. Just notice the TV and magazine ads and it is clear what is being "pushed" and by whom.

People are encouraged to undergo these sometimes barbaric treatments (thinking cancer here) and a slew of exorbitantly expensive tests, treatments, and drugs. I am in the midst of cataract surgery and the eye drops alone(2 types x 2 eyes) retail at $590.00!! My Doc insists on brand name drops for cataract surgery. Fortunately I can afford them and my $320.00 annual drug deductible kicks in before I reach $590.00...but many people would not be able to afford them. And this is NOTHING compared to the cost of many drugs used for cancer and heart disease.

There is competition INSIDE the medical biz for the big dollars and this, paradoxically, drives costs up- not down~ because everybody wants a huge piece of the pie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 12:03 PM
 
1,733 posts, read 1,823,288 times
Reputation: 1135
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Yes. Yes, it is.

Seen a lot of the people with polio recently? Palsy. The funny people with bells, the lepers, where did they go? The brain damaged kids from measles? Remember trying not to invest too much love in your toddler, because most died before they were five?

Those people with facial deformities, enormous scars from war wounds...plague? Remember plague? The massivly scarred faces from smallpox survivors. Blind people with cataracts easily curable today. Tetanus. The fear of rabies.

The list goes on and on and on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Please start a new thread if you want to talk about this. It's totally off-topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,377,706 times
Reputation: 2276
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Because UHC is free. They pay huge taxes on everything they buy in Europe, to fund government health care.
Utter misinformation. Health insurance premiums are health insurance premiums, period. It has NOTHING to do with taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top