Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Have you ever peed outside? Most of us have. That can get you on the RSO list.
So are you OK with ruining the lives of every guy who has peed on a golf course? There are millions of them.
Did you have sex at age 16 or less? Even just touching or looking at a girls breasts? Millions of us did. That would put millions more on the RSO list. So are you OK with ruining the lives of your children because they had sex at 16 or even sexted at 16? Or maybe your kids mooned somebody at 16. You OK with their life being ruined by the RSO list?
Sounds like you are the sick one.
Don't forget, that sexting? Sending nude photos of yourself to the boyfriend\girlfriend (as stupid as it is...) constitutes possession and distribution of child pornography.
Sex offender registries are necessary. The sex offender maps are necessary so parents, and other people can see where the sexually perverse are living.
Necessary? How did we ever manage to do without something that was "necessary" right up until 1994?
Whose unhealthy or repressed sexual attitudes meeting up with paranoia?
Sex offender registries are necessary. The sex offender maps are necessary so parents, and other people can see where the sexually perverse are living.
There is nothing healthy about living near pedophiles, or rapists.
RSO lists are not necessary at all. People lived for centuries without them.
So you are OK living next to a murderer but not a sex offender? How smart is that?
I for one think people have a right to know when a convicted sex offender moves in next door. Facts are facts, rapists tend to repeat. Pedophiles tend to repeat.
Some may be ok with having a child molester next door eyeing their kids, but I most certainly am not. Oh he lives 3 blocks away but 1 block from the icecream parlor? In life there are consequences. Get caught drunk driving and you are not allowed to drive. Do it multiple times and maybe you are banned for life.
18 year old had sex with a 15 year old. Pretty sure he knew it was jailbait.
Baseball coach fondles his pitcher. Well I am certain that I dont want him coaching any other kids.
The families take a hit for what the offender did?
So do the families of serial killers, murderers and drug dealers.
I for one think people have a right to know when a convicted sex offender moves in next door. Facts are facts, rapists tend to repeat. Pedophiles tend to repeat.
By your stats there are re offenders. What is the acceptable risk if it is your child? 5% 3% 2 %?
Me 1% is too high, but then I feel 1% is too high regardless of whose child, wife, daughter, mother might be the victim.
I for one think people have a right to know when a convicted sex offender moves in next door. Facts are facts, rapists tend to repeat. Pedophiles tend to repeat..
Do you have those facts? You might be surprised.
"Among prisoners released in 1994, 2.5 percent of rapists were arrested for a new rape in the three years covered by the study. By comparison, 13 percent of the offenders who had served time for robbery and 23 percent of the offenders who had served time for (nonsexual) assault were arrested again for similar crimes."
No because in the 16th century murder rape and other things were accepted more than they are today.
Sorry but the only victim in this thread are those who were victimized by the ideal citizens that you attempt to defend.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.