Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I honestly do not understand why conservatives think that enacting something that had already been in place just 9 years earlier is in any way taking away your rights. The Supreme Court has already ruled that it doesnt.
Democrats were not using this to their advantage, they saw a dangerous situation and sought a solution that would protect the citizens of this nation.
are you actually arguing that democrats want to take your guns away for the hell of it ? How would that help democrats ?
It's pathetic and sad if you actually believe that. Democrats saw a tragic incident and thought they could make political gains from it, period.
How exactly is banning firearms that weren't used in that incident a solution? It wasn't, it was nothing more than the anti gun people to try and push their agenda using the deaths of those children.
I honestly do not understand why conservatives think that enacting something that had already been in place just 9 years earlier is in any way taking away your rights. The Supreme Court has already ruled that it doesnt.
Democrats were not using this to their advantage, they saw a dangerous situation and sought a solution that would protect the citizens of this nation.
are you actually arguing that democrats want to take your guns away for the hell of it ? How would that help democrats ?
That's just plain absurd. It wasn't in effect for 220 years before that.
The SCOTUS never ruled on the AWB. They did say in the Heller case that all arms in common use are protected. The AWB bans the most popular, common arms.
Probably to make it easier to murder citizens without trial when they present challenges to their thirst for power, as obama is doing today.
Intervening in what? So far as I know, there have been no new gun control laws enacted since Newtown.
Are they trying?
Lets look at all the interventionism, that has limited our rights to be free from the king. Not what they are trying with our right to protect ourselves from tyranny.
I thnk its just people realising that one mroe gun restrction is goig to safe gurad them anymopre than the last. Numbers buying guns for self protection shows that ;I beleive. Cry wolf once too many times;yet the wolf attacks get worse.
I thnk its just people realising that one mroe gun restrction is goig to safe gurad them anymopre than the last. Numbers buying guns for self protection shows that ;I beleive. Cry wolf once too many times;yet the wolf attacks get worse.
The number of people buying guns isn't on the rise, those with guns already are buying more of them.
The number of people buying guns isn't on the rise, those with guns already are buying more of them.
The number of first time buyers of firearms is up in big numbers. Women making up the bulk if first time firearm buyers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
