Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The 1950's was the most free and prosperous time this country has ever experienced, it's been downhill ever since. They are rewriting history to make it out to be one of the worst of times. doublespeak
"Rewriting history" in other words acknowledging history from the perspective of people other than white males.
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper The 1950's was the most free and prosperous time this country has ever experienced, it's been downhill ever since.
Based on what metric, specifically?
That would be the Entitled, Self-Satisfied White Male Metric. (WMM)
So the CIA put him on the terrorist list but the FBI didn't know about it.
Didn't we form the DHS 10+ years ago to coordinate the various agencies so that information flowed freely between them ?
I guess we need yet another agency to make sure the agency that coordinates the agencies is doing their job.
The Gorelick wall is still in place. Napalitano should be fired over this. Yes that new agency sounds about how the government will react to this and why not add another agencey to oversee them to boot just in case they need some overseeing.
If we cant keep tabs on people like that then why the hell do we need to let that many people in? We need, at the very least, to choose more wisely who the hell we allow in our country.
And what is the point of having these lists when nobody is keeping an eye on the folks who are on em? Meanwhile granny just got shaken down at the airport.
And they're not Esposito's numbers, or Gallup's numbers, either. So I don't have to dispute them with researched evidence. I simply have to say that the National Review article you pulled them from has an agenda, and played with poll numbers the same way that the GOP "unskewed" pollsters played with the numbers during the last election. Your National Review article is of the same ilk, wanting to "unskew" the results. And we all know how reliable those "unskewed" numbers were.
She's getting ready to go bye bye. If she isn't deported she'll be jailed for knowing what her two little subhumans were up to and doing nothing. Forget being able to work or even look her neighbors in the eye. The wif eof the older dead one may end up doing jail time as well. I'd definitely disown her if she does.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
