Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2013, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I don't actually think she should have been made an exception to the rule, but I certainly don't blame the family for trying. Wouldn't anyone do whatever it took to try to save their child? Why the hate?
No hate. Somewhere out there, there are two families who have deeply loved, watched die, and buried their family member who also desperately needed a lung transplant. Their possible lung transplant went to Sarah instead. BTW, many of these are young teens with CF. This is my frustration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2013, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
This poor girl; she looked absolutely miserable yesterday. I hope they didn't prolong her life only to include more suffering.

It seems that happens so often because it's so hard to say good-bye.
You saw a recent picture of her? Can you provide a link to that picture? I highly doubt that the family released such photos. I am guessing what you saw was a photo of Sarah before her first transplant surgery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
As we were hearing in the news that Sarah's adult lung transplant was a "complete success" and that Sarah was recovering, this is what was really going on:

Quote:
Janet and Fran Murnaghan announced on June 12 that their daughter’s first lung transplant had been a success, but according to their statement, her health quickly began to deteriorate after the initial operation.
“That evening, as we waited for Sarah to be transitioned back to her room, an emergency code blue was announced,” Sarah’s parents wrote in the statement. “Sarah's vital signs had begun descending rapidly as her new lungs started to fail.”

Read more: Family reveals 10-year-old girl who fought organ donation guidelines had second lung transplant | Fox News

Why the dishonesty?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:06 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You saw a recent picture of her? Can you provide a link to that picture? I highly doubt that the family released such photos. I am guessing what you saw was a photo of Sarah before her first transplant surgery.
It was on the news the other night. She looked pretty bad and they were doing a story about the failure of the transplant. But it could have been old footage where she looked pretty bad, I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:10 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,039,923 times
Reputation: 3603
Medical boards/ physicians should be able to make these decisions without threats of loss of funding. Government should be completely out of it. I can only imagine how much worse this gets with Obamacare coming
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Medical boards/ physicians should be able to make these decisions without threats of loss of funding. Government should be completely out of it. I can only imagine how much worse this gets with Obamacare coming

May I remind you that Kathleen Sebelius said that these decisions should be made by the medical boards and physicians?

Quote:
Rush Limbaugh says HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was the "one person" to determine fate of 10-year-old lung patient Sarah Murnaghan!
PolitiFact | Rush Limbaugh says HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was the "one person" to determine fate of 10-year-old lung patient Sarah Murnaghan

Quote:
Sebelius explained her reasoning to a House committee, saying "there are about 40 very seriously ill Pennsylvanians over the age of 12 also waiting for a lung transplant, and three other children in the Philadelphia (area) at the same acuity rate as Sarah waiting for a lung transplant. The decisions of the … transplant committee -- which is not bureaucrats; it's transplant surgeons and health care providers who design the protocol -- are based on their best medical judgment of the most appropriate way to decide allocation in an impossibly difficult situation."

Last edited by jojajn; 06-29-2013 at 09:28 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 12:35 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I have inside knowledge that "modifying" adult lungs to fit is a too small body never has good results. After all the publicity, Sarah's doctors probably felt obligated to jam some adult lungs into her. We see now why doctors know more about medicine than a federal judge!
It's not just "her" doctors. They are looking at changing the qualifications if you read the link I posted earlier. It appears nobody has. They have suspended the requirements until next year and taking each case like this on a one on one basis and evaluating it until they decide on what actions they will take. I guess your inside knowledge trumps all theirs? What happened to the doctors know what is right? Her own doctors also said they wanted to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 12:36 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
Liberals and conservatives both want the government making decisions for them. And they both want judges over riding the will of the people. But liberals are the worse of the two.
The will of the people? Was there a vote I missed that decided who got what lungs? What are you talking about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 12:38 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
How do you think Sarah's case will impact their decision?
We shall see if it effects it at all won't we?? Hopefully their decision saves some kids lives that would have died before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Liberals are against saving a little girl's life?

Harrier isn't surprised.

The Democrats are the pro-death party, after all.
Its not a liberal vs conservative issue. You fell for the media manipulation like so many others. They played with your emotions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top