Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Intelligent Design?
Yes, teach it along with Evolution 22 15.28%
No, teach only Evolution 121 84.03%
No, teach only Intelligent Design 1 0.69%
Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2013, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,469,695 times
Reputation: 8599

Advertisements

Cut away the pretensions and gobbledegook - and ID'ers and creationists are just narcissists who think the Earth, solar system, and the entire universe were made by a God as a proving ground for humans before they can enter an unknown dimension. This isn't science and doesn't belong in public schools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2013, 12:20 AM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,133,586 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
What I find hilarious it all this discussion is that 3 blocks from my home is a museum which bills itself as the creation science museum. For fun and giggles I went in there one day. They actually had a display which suggested man and dinosaurs lived together.

Amazing.

Sent from my Nexus 4
Was it Fred Flintstone and Dino?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 12:38 AM
 
234 posts, read 184,771 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
As in "Chariot of The Gods?"
Sure, at least as an idea.

There are some funky things that exist which people refuse to consider on either side of the science versus faith thing. They are too wrapped up in the societal changes, the politics, in seeing progress in devolution by every greasy finger swipe on treated glass.

Look at the experiments we conduct today. If we are doing it and we are not the only sentient beings in the galaxy... it would be silly to think others aren't far beyond us in technology or below us. Look at the difference between a simple village in the Amazon or Afghanistan and NYC with everything else in-between on Earth.

Would it be so silly if the galaxy were like that too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 12:50 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,389,418 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Was it Fred Flintstone and Dino?
Holy cow. Do grown adults really believe this?

Exhibits | Creation Museum



And check out what these Creationists think is a 'research paper'

Creation Evidence Museum of Texas Online - Research Paper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 01:51 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Intelligent Design opposes natural selection. That's kinda the whole point behind the idea of Intelligent Design.

Here is what you posted earlier in the thread:





Now you say that you accept natural selection and genetic drift as fact?

Are your views 'evolving' before our very eyes?

Perhaps you've accidently learnt something by chance when you were looking up what natural selection means and copied and pasted a paragraph about beetles from here? http://salempress.com/store/pdfs/animal_life.pdf
Are you trying in a very round about way to invalidate something I clearly quoted..but making it look like I plagiarized? You seem to try your hand at this often with people. I have made reference to this FACT before...with you. You don't care to recall...or just genuinely don't recall...probably because you were in a fury of hyperlinking handfuls of your bogus studies or engaging in a fury of your talking points ad-nauseum

Again, it has been pointed out to you that the concept of ID is not dogmatic and CAN be taught as such...the way they package it in the context of curriculum, yes. ID is not limited to the formation of man nor is it all inclusive of every detail of existence.

Intelligent design goes beyond life. Humans can, in theory, simply be unintended consequences.

Last....for the third time....if an Agnostic tells you they don't believe in abiogenesis or big bang or that the universe just happened...

ARE THEY RELIGIOUS? ARE THEY CREATIONISTS? Yes or no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 02:02 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
I think it also needs to be pointed out again....that it is not widely suggested (in this thread) that the concept of ID be taught AS science but along with it...math is taught along with science.... meaning as part of the curriculum..

Even as philosophy that is fine...because science was born from philosophy. The questions need to be asked. Once technology allows...its just a matter of technology catching up so these questions can be tested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 02:35 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,121,492 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
Are you trying in a very round about way to invalidate something I clearly quoted..but making it look like I plagiarized? You seem to try your hand at this often with people. I have made reference to this FACT before...with you. You don't care to recall...or just genuinely don't recall...probably because you were in a fury of hyperlinking handfuls of your bogus studies or engaging in a fury of your talking points ad-nauseum

Again, it has been pointed out to you that the concept of ID is not dogmatic and CAN be taught as such...the way they package it in the context of curriculum, yes. ID is not limited to the formation of man nor is it all inclusive of every detail of existence.
It can taught in philosophy class or humanities. Still isn't science.

Quote:
Intelligent design goes beyond life. Humans can, in theory, simply be unintended consequences.

Last....for the third time....if an Agnostic tells you they don't believe in abiogenesis or big bang or that the universe just happened...

ARE THEY RELIGIOUS? ARE THEY CREATIONISTS? Yes or no?
Neither. Just ignorant about modern scientific theories relating to the origin of the universe and life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 02:42 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,121,492 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
I think it also needs to be pointed out again....that it is not widely suggested (in this thread) that the concept of ID be taught AS science but along with it...math is taught along with science.... meaning as part of the curriculum..
Along with... meaning next door in the philosophy or humanities class, yes.

Quote:
Even as philosophy that is fine...because science was born from philosophy.
....and? ID still isn't science.

Quote:
The questions need to be asked. Once technology allows...its just a matter of technology catching up so these questions can be tested.
We have the technology now....

Are you waiting for us to invent time travel so we can put closed circuit cameras across the globe so we can literally watch evolution in super fast mode?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 02:45 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Along with... meaning next door in the philosophy or humanities class, yes.



....and? ID still isn't science.



We have the technology now....

Are you waiting for us to invent time travel so we can put closed circuit cameras across the globe so we can literally watch evolution in super fast mode?
String theory still isn't falsifiable.....I'd say we are well off from having the technology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2013, 02:46 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
It can taught in philosophy class or humanities. Still isn't science.



Neither. Just ignorant about modern scientific theories relating to the origin of the universe and life.
Keep saying it isn't science...you are not making any point.

Big Bang Theory is NOT falsifiable..don't hold that against an Agnostic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top