Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:08 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 26,005,972 times
Reputation: 29454

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
If the store owner knew he was a gang member it leaves your theory dead in the water!
Witnessing a gang member shoplifting justifies deadly force? Do outline the legal thinking behind that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Chattanooga, TN
3,045 posts, read 5,246,315 times
Reputation: 5156
In most states (all? maybe, IDK) deadly force is and should be reserved for where it is required to protect a life or prevent major physical harm. Property damage or loss never justifies deadly force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,419,987 times
Reputation: 4190
Default Rodney Duve, Texas store owner, allegedly kills man for stealing beer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Great idea - let's lower the threshold for deadly force to "shoplifting".

Sure we can't lower it further?

Don't want to get shot? Don't jump in line.
Don't want to get shot? Don't run a yellow light.
Don't want to get shot? Don't walk around with a smart look on your face.
Don't want to get shot? Don't talk back to police officers.

There are reasons behind society establishing thresholds for using deadly force.
If you add "taking two parking spaces intentionally" and "not returning the shopping cart to the corral" I'd vote for you...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
2,440 posts, read 3,431,950 times
Reputation: 2629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Agreed and that's the rub. Killing someone over a beer is disgusting. Just because the law allows it doesn't mean someone should.
And what's next? Can I now kill someone for killing someone who wanted to drink beer and was rude about it??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:46 AM
 
2,463 posts, read 2,789,448 times
Reputation: 3627
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The laws in Texas are quite "liberal" with the use of deadly force to protect property.

You can for example use deadly force if your neighbors house is being burglarized, this guy was never charged.
It should be every U.S. citizens right to protect their property. I commend this guy for standing up to these thugs.

It should be a federal law allowing U.S. citizens the right to use deadly force to protect, you or your neighbors to protect your property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:49 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 26,005,972 times
Reputation: 29454
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9162 View Post
It should be every U.S. citizens right to protect their property. I commend this guy for standing up to these thugs.

It should be a federal law allowing U.S. citizens the right to use deadly force to protect, you or your neighbors to protect your property.
More dead people, yay!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 10:53 AM
 
15,856 posts, read 14,487,406 times
Reputation: 11958
I don't think the issue was that he was stealing beer per se, it was that it was a grab and run shoplifting type of theft, with no physical threat to the shopkeeper. Generally to use deadly force, there needs to be a direct threat to the life of the person defending themselves. TX laws may be a bit different in this regard, but I still think there needs to be an element of physical deadly threat.

If the thief grabbed a six pack, the pulled a knife to keep the shopkeeper from stopping him (essentially turning it into an armed robbery), then the shopkeeper would likely be considered justified shooting the thief. The stolen item would likely not be the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 11:07 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 26,005,972 times
Reputation: 29454
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
If the thief grabbed a six pack, the pulled a knife to keep the shopkeeper from stopping him (essentially turning it into an armed robbery), then the shopkeeper would likely be considered justified shooting the thief. The stolen item would likely not be the issue.
Agreed, completely different situation - assault with deadly weapon, the six-pack wouldn't even be relevant. And yes, deadly force can of course be met with deadly force in self-defense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 01:08 PM
 
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,410,174 times
Reputation: 2394
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
I don't think the issue was that he was stealing beer per se, it was that it was a grab and run shoplifting type of theft, with no physical threat to the shopkeeper. Generally to use deadly force, there needs to be a direct threat to the life of the person defending themselves. TX laws may be a bit different in this regard, but I still think there needs to be an element of physical deadly threat.

If the thief grabbed a six pack, the pulled a knife to keep the shopkeeper from stopping him (essentially turning it into an armed robbery), then the shopkeeper would likely be considered justified shooting the thief. The stolen item would likely not be the issue.
This sounds perfectly logical. But consider that such crimes are never even followed up on by the cops. This leaves business owners (by no means "rich" or even well-to-do) at the mercy of people who have no fear of repercussions. This wasn't just a couple of 6-packs of beer to him - it is his livelihood (and of his family). He has a right to protect his business, investment, and hard work. If the police can't do it for him, then it is up to him. Yes. A thief dead is such a waste, but the police aren't doing anything to deter them in order that justice would prevail. It takes death apparently for the police to deem something worthwhile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2013, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,227,263 times
Reputation: 6553
killing a thief while in the act of stealing is a bad thing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top