Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2013, 05:59 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,566 posts, read 17,241,593 times
Reputation: 17612

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Sounds like a fox news talking point, surely you can think of one other president that radically change the US.

The republicans tried to defund Obama Care 40 times and sent it to the supreme court and have doing nothing but obstruct, their plan for the last election was just to defeat Obama, they could care less about solutions. I don't think anyone has to worry about the right wing staying home, the government shutdown told us all we need to know.
So it sounds like a fox news talking point and your not sure. Confused are you?

Do you not see that legislation as sweeping as obamacare must be passed through the furnace of argument before apporval in order to temper it and make it bulletproof in order to safeguard the nation?

Do you order items as costly as your house or car on-line, wrapped in brown paper, with only a stencil categorically saying what's inside? That is what you are supporting with obamacare. That is what your elected representative did on your behalf. You find that comforting?

Do you suppose there might be a legitimate argument against obamacare based on the method of approval when legal advocates said it wasn't a tax, it wasa fine. They said that in order to gain public acceptance. If they said it was a tax, Obamacare would not have passed. The scotus said it was a tax not a fine. Do you not have an issue with this?

Maybe a valid argument based on the intent to cover, obama corrected himself from 46 million to 36 million because he said it wouldn't cover illegal aliens, and the CBO claims 30 million will be without coverage.

All estimates of the cost of obamacare must have been for medicated bubble gum because the cost has left this galaxy. Cost was also a selling point.

Do you see a pattern of lies, are you in the least suspicious of a law that passed without being read or understood and could not be explained by those who approved it ? and wonder of wonders does it make you uncomfortable that Dem legislators who passed obamacare were surprised enough to propose legislation to keep their doctor and insurance when they were recently SURPRISED to find that Obama's promise of keeping your doctor was negated by legislation they approved?

If a state insurance agency discovered an insurance agent sold you expensive coverage you don't need, without the slightest probabilty of you ever using it, the agent and comapny would be charged with a crime. Yet this is the basis of obamacare and in fact mandates you pay for coverage you don't need. This crime differentiates substandard coverage from mandated coverage. They have to pretend to sell you something to justify the cost because if they said you were in pool and the extra cost to you was to pay for someone else, the Obamacre legislation would now be confetti stored for the Washington redskins super bowl victory parade.

Do you fail to see the need to overturn legislation that had to be installed in the dark of the night by democratic dupes, some of which had to be bribed for their vote?

Do you not see that legislation that is so good for you can't be sold on its merits and must be enforced by the IRS whose integrity is now the subject of a potential crime?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2013, 06:17 AM
 
24,421 posts, read 23,080,421 times
Reputation: 15029
How very Palpatine of Reid. But how will the "Emperor" maintain control without the bureaucracy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 06:40 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,959,399 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post

Then Sen Obama against Nuclear Option 'Fighting, Bitterness 2 increase, Gridlock 2 get worse' - YouTube


These crooks are either so arrogant or they feel untouchable........

Just look at his video!!! SMH

This country is chose this path.......we are dissolving right before our very eyes.....
Our friends on the left tend to just ignore things like this. Hypocrisy and hubris becomes them. They're just following the lead of their failed President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 06:47 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,031,367 times
Reputation: 62204
I know praying isn't in your wheelhouse but you better do some kind of pagan dance that Obamacare actually starts to work because if the Senate changes hands in 2014...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 06:57 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
I'm a conservative, but I think the filibuster should have been done away with decades ago (if it should have ever existed in the first place.) Like it or not, we have a majority rules government. The filibuster only creates gridlock. The shouldn't need a supermajority to pass something.

And also, what goes around comes around. At some point the Republicans will get control of the Senate. If the Dems get rid of the filibuster, at that point they're going to have live with whatever the Republicans want.


When 50.1% can tell 49.9% what to do, when to do it, and how to do it, you are setting yourself up for a revolution.

2/3 is the only thing keeping this nation from civil war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:19 AM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,785,732 times
Reputation: 1461
I personally think the nuclear option is great. The road goes both ways.

If (and that's a big if) the Republicans win back the Senate and still control the House after 2014.

If Republicans control both of the chambers and keep passing legislation that they know Obama will veto.

Will Democrats go on record as they have done with Republicans by calling them the party of "no".

If Obama has to veto almost every piece of Republican legislation. Can Democrats call their own President, the "No" president?

Chances are they will will find any excuse not to call him the president of No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:23 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post
no more checks and balances..........we have a king now.......not a President. Like it or not the filibuster is as American as our founders intended.

But that's over now.
Seems to me you don't understand how our government is structured, nor about the role of the different branches. The America-haters lost yesterday ... and that's reason enough to celebrate, even just a little.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,330,440 times
Reputation: 2889
Well the amusing side story to this is that even with his "nuclear option", Obama may still have a hard time passing anything since members of his own party are starting to defect. Obama is becoming toxic to his own party, and those up for re-election in 2014 are running for cover and jumping ship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:40 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,134,648 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Both parties have been undemocratic in using them.

Now if one likes them, they should also want a 261 minimum vote requirement in the House (60%) to do anything. That should include appointing a House speaker, committe memberships, anything at all. At least they would not than simply be playing politics with the issue.
Nope. The House and the Senate do not have the same role or purpose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:53 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,264,862 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
What a bunch of garbage.
IF what you claim is so true, why didn't the repubs do it when they held both Houses of Congress under W. Bush?

Again, you prove how ignorant you are.
*sigh*

Because, as I and numerous others here have tried to explain to you frantic righties, the GOP abused the filibuster in historic, epic proportions starting in 2009. Back then, there was one senator who was trying to en the filibuster, and all the other Dems told him to forget it.

Four years later, after the GOTP repeatedly broke "gentlemen's" promises and ran roughshod over decades of unwritten rules by abusing the filibuster, the Dems finally gave up.

You shrieking children can cry all you like, but those are the facts. Even a cursory Google search will enlighten you. Of course, you get your "news" from Breitbart and Rush who are lying to you … so you just keep on repeating the same nonsense as above.

Boy, do you guys look uneducated on this thread.

Edited to add: This is also why then-Sen. Obama opposed going nuclear in 2005. The GOP hadn't yet gone insane. and actually destroyed the good will that Dems believed in back then. Your bleats of "hypocrisy" convince no one outside your rightwing bubble.

Last edited by jmqueen; 11-22-2013 at 08:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top