Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:02 PM
 
2,687 posts, read 2,184,746 times
Reputation: 1478

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
The justification used by Obama was more disturbing than a change in the senate rules that stood since the 1700s. The dems are not willing to negotiate and will seek out short term objectives to install a socialist agenda. The bill will never come due if thet are successful and they have bet their lives on winning.
The filibuster is the misuse and exploitation of a wrinkle of parliamentary procedure which was never intended to be used to require super majorities to pass any legislation in the Senate. The rule in question came into being in 1806, not the 1700s and wasn't exploited to demand super-majorities for a vote on legislation until the 1830s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:02 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,816 times
Reputation: 2127
That would be because the historic, obstructionist abuse by the GOP of the filibuster -- something no one had ever tried before and which people of good will had never imagined could ever happen -- hadn't started yet.



Thread fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:03 PM
 
2,687 posts, read 2,184,746 times
Reputation: 1478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post

Good, I hate the filibuster. Good riddance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:03 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,816 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Votre_Chef View Post
The filibuster is the misuse and exploitation of a wrinkle of parliamentary procedure which was never intended to be used to require super majorities to pass any legislation in the Senate. The rule in question came into being in 1806, not the 1700s and wasn't exploited to demand super-majorities for a vote on legislation until the 1830s.
Oh golly, you're gonna make the little RWNJs really scramble to spin this a bit harder. Oh well, at least they'll get a good workout, all that twisting and turning.

[reaches for the popcorn]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:07 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,535 posts, read 17,211,948 times
Reputation: 17561
2005
"Sen. Dianne Feinstein: “The nuclear option, if successful, will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of Senators unhappy with any position taken by the minority. It begins with judicial nominations. Next, will be executive appointments. And then, legislation.â€

I learned everything I know about the nuclear option from D Fieinstein
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:07 PM
Status: "Smartened up and walked away!" (set 21 days ago)
 
11,769 posts, read 5,783,856 times
Reputation: 14187
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Just like they will stick it to you when a republican is in office. Reid just opened up a can of worms and you are all for it just because Democrats did it. Obama is loving this.

Was it not Reid, Hillary and Obama in 2005 that said that the nuclear option should not be used because it was unfair to the people we represent. Love how when the shoe is on the other foot it's OK.

I predict my party is again using this to deflect attention away from Obamacare's problems but have no idea that they have just lost themselves any chance of winning future elections.

In the past if the Senate didn't like an appointee because they were too moderate or too liberal - the President ( Bush, Clinton ect..) would nominate another not so far from the center - not Obama - it's his way or the highway - push it through and unfortunately the rest of your party will suffer - but does he care - no because he won't be running again and all the appointees who were also big bundled backers will owe him. I don't think I have ever disliked a President let alone a Democrat as much in my 56 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,946 posts, read 13,330,473 times
Reputation: 14005
lol - this is really going to bite the democrats in their nether region when the republicans take over the senate in next year's election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,031,539 times
Reputation: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Well genius, I was refering to the Ted Cruz government shutdown that the republicans manufactured in the house so recently.

I actually read the link I posted in the OP and it only applies to judicial appointments, not including the Supreme Court and not legislation.
Then the poster was correct, and you just contradicted yourself. This would have done nothing to stop Cruz from his filibuster.

Furthermore, the pendulum swings both ways, and this is setting up a president that both parties will abuse, and cause an even bigger divide. We are witnessing the end of bi-partisan politics.

The Democrats fear their majority in the Senate will evaporate in November, and they're doing exactly what they did when they rammed through Obamacare in a totally partisan fashion. I'm sick of both parties ignoring the people, but this is really showing how little regard some have for the Constitution. Reid is by far the worst Senator since McCarthy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
2005
"Sen. Dianne Feinstein: “The nuclear option, if successful, will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of Senators unhappy with any position taken by the minority. It begins with judicial nominations. Next, will be executive appointments. And then, legislation.”
Isn't it funny how their agendas change when they are the minority. I guarantee that as soon as Republicans control both branches of Congress, the Democrats will whine about how the super-majority needs to be reinstated. It really is a circus in DC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
lol - this is really going to bite the democrats in their nether region when the republicans take over the senate in next year's election.
Exactly right, if everything is as it seems. I have a sinking feeling there's something far more sinister going on.

Last edited by surfman; 11-21-2013 at 03:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:18 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,361,452 times
Reputation: 17261
Sorry but its one thing to oppose ending the filibuster when its being used moderately. Its another when its being used to basically stop the government from functioning.

For those that like comparisons-
my city has noise limits that start around 10 pm. This has worked well overall.

New neighbor moves in, plays chainsaw noises over loudpeakers set .1 decibal under any other limit that might exist, from 7 am to 10 pm......every day.

For years.

And when I complain he says "hey this is the agreement we have in this city, and you better not change it because when YOU want to do this someday you wont be able too".

Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2013, 03:20 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,280,097 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Votre_Chef View Post
Good, I hate the filibuster. Good riddance.
Unfortunately this current amendment to filibustering is relegated to just appointees to the courts. Filibusters have been part of the American political process for a long time but its been a few here a few there, current repubs have used the procedure as an obstructionist tactic to literally prevent government from functioning and not in the spirit the procedure was originally intended, as close to 500 filibusters have been initiated by the repubs since Obama came to office some change to the procedure was inevitable..

Last edited by jambo101; 11-21-2013 at 03:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top