Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2014, 06:19 PM
 
1,922 posts, read 1,745,659 times
Reputation: 798

Advertisements

Is it morally wrong to have lots of kids if you don't have the money to support them?

YES!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2014, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
Morally wrong? Yes. It's also stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 06:26 PM
 
Location: USA
31,050 posts, read 22,077,427 times
Reputation: 19085
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
It's more than that. Since time began, people have been having children they cannot reasonably expect to feed , let alone shelter or otherwise support. The bible is full of the " be fruitful and multiply" thing. It also calls for rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground. But that's another story for another thread.

Generally speaking, life expectancy is lower in those areas with high birthrates. The lack of jobs, services, government aid, education and so on has done nothing to cause most people from having as many children as possible.

Producing children is viewed as the primary purpose/obligation of life.
Reckon so. Wonder what it is about Darwinisn that the least capable of supporting children seem to have the most
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 06:31 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,420,711 times
Reputation: 55562
religion of many encourages child birth without the means to support that birth.
all of them point here to get it fixed.
not good.
japanese call it cow bird behavior. having other creatures raise your offspring by leaving your young in their nest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
With that mindset, their church can help support the children they can not afford. NOT the taxpayers. This country needs people that take responsibility for their own actions, and that includes the financial aspect, short of a tragedy.

There was a time when folks had large families partly because not knowing any better, but also because they were farmers and needed the extra hands. Medically, not all of their offspring even lived to the age of 18. Now, with the advancement of medicine and only one percent involved in farming (at least here in the US), there is no excuse to have a large family if you can not afford to care for them.

We don't need any more dumb people in the world which you would have to be, to have a large family you can not afford.
And what if the person is agnostic, non-practicing or even atheist? I don't think all will go get help from a religion...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Dublin, CA
3,807 posts, read 4,275,649 times
Reputation: 3984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
IMO.....if you can not support children......you should not have them.
Exactly. It's morally and ethically wrong. But, he'll, make the rest of society pay for people's mistakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Is it morally wrong to have lots of kids if you don't have the money to support them?

Yes. In order to have children, people should be forced to:

1. Take a course in the psychology and child raising education.
2. Obtain a child bearing license and undergo a psychological evaluation.
3. Have a background check and credit check performed.
4. Show their last six bank statements and six months of pay stubs.
5. Produce three references who are not family members.

It ought to be at least as difficult as renting an apartment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:40 PM
 
10,099 posts, read 7,767,103 times
Reputation: 8583
It's wrong for the children. They are the ones that suffer. I don't think anyone can agree that that is right.

I know of 2 young girls that are sisters. Neither is married or working and each had 3 kids each.

Come to find out one girl just found out she lost custody of one kid today. One boy will be staying and living permanently with the baby daddy's mom so one child will be raised by a grandma.

The other 2 children of this girl go from house to house living with different ones because the mom left and moved across country to be a prostitute and to appear in a porn. Wow, what a great role model she is. She abandoned them for about a year. She is now back living with her grandma and is trying to get her other 2 kids back. Personally I just think she liked the money she'd get from the government and the baby daddy in child support if she got them back. I don't think she really actually cares about them. She's too into drugs and acting like a gangster to care about anyone but herself.

The other girl with 3 children had 2 children and then had to go to prison for robbing someone at gunpoint. After getting released from prison she immediately had another baby. OMG. What's wrong with these people????? She lives with someone that she's had arrested twice for domestic abuse. She keeps letting him move back in and she claims he beats her up in front of the kids. What I don't get is why does Social Services allow this girl to take this guy back into her trailer with her kids? How is that right? I don't understand.

BYW there are different baby daddies with these kids and most of the kids have mental or physical issues due to the moms not taking care of themselves while pregnant...i.e. drugs, drinking, etc.

The one that got out of prison had one of her sisters take care of one baby and one baby daddy mother take care of the other. What a big hot mess. I feel like eventually she'll lose her kids too or more grandmothers will end up raising. How fair is that to the grandmothers to have to raise kids again?

I'm not making this stuff up. I swear this is some crazy stuff. The girls if they work, don't hold a job long at all. They want to sit back and collect government money and let their families do a lot of babysitting and supplying of food and fun times.

I just feel for the children. They are the ones suffering and more than likely will have mental issues when growing up from living in different places and being so neglected.

What the answer is, I don't know but this has always been a sore subject with me.

I used to work in the ER and I remember these single moms coming in with 10 kids and their medicaid cards with all their children's name on it. I always wondered why in the hell they had so many kids when it was evident they couldn't afford them. Sure I know their thinking is the more you have, the more money you get from the government and they were raised that way, etc......still doesn't make it right at all. Again it's the kids that suffer for their idiot mother's dumb decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:42 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,051,128 times
Reputation: 10270
I don't judge morality.

I just wish to be off the hook for feeding your kids and buying your abortions.

How's that for the government staying out of your bedroom?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
[quote=Is it morally wrong to have lots of kids if you don't have the money to support them?[/QUOTE]

Yes. Absolutely!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top