Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2014, 10:09 AM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,235,281 times
Reputation: 7693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
You mean like Reagan or Bush did? LMAO
Some people really have short memories, an axe to grind against Republicans and no knowledge of America's intelligence gathering and oversea's operations other than the biased web sites/news articles they read...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2014, 10:31 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,284,447 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Some people really have short memories, an axe to grind against Republicans and no knowledge of America's intelligence gathering and oversea's operations other than the biased web sites/news articles they read...
Answer the question. Did Reagan or Bush transform the CIA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,571,537 times
Reputation: 21679
The Intelligence Committee was investigating the CIA on it's torture program, and the CIA illegally spies on the committee. When accusations arose, the director said such accusations are "absolutely untrue, beyond the scope of reason"

When the snake says that you can trust it when you pick it up, don't be surprised when you get bit. Even the snake admits that this is what it does, it is a snake, after all.

Quote:
The director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, issued an extraordinary apology to leaders of the US Senate intelligence committee on Thursday, conceding that the agency employees spied on committee staff and reversing months of furious and public denials.

Brennan acknowledged that an internal investigation had found agency security personnel transgressed a firewall set up on a CIA network, which allowed Senate committee investigators to review agency documents for their landmark inquiry into CIA torture.

Among other things, it was revealed that agency officials conducted keyword searches and email searches on committee staff while they used the network.
CIA admits to spying on Senate staffers | World news | The Guardian

Last edited by odanny; 07-31-2014 at 07:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 08:31 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,284,447 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
The Intelligence Committee was investigating the CIA on it's torture program, and the CIA illegally spies on the committee. When accusations arose, the director said such accusations are "absolutely untrue, beyond the scope of reason"

When the snake says that you can trust it when you pick it up, don't be surprised when you get bit. Even the snake admits that this is what it does, it is a snake, after all.



CIA admits to spying on Senate staffers | World news | The Guardian
Tip of the iceberg.

Their malfeasance over their period of existence is astounding...it's like a laundry list of criminal activity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Central Nebraska
553 posts, read 597,351 times
Reputation: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Been reading some books as of late about our Intel agencies, and it's pretty clear that our main intelligence agency is about as inept as they come. One of the worst Intel agencies in the world.

To boot, they've gone far beyond what they were intended to do...gather good intelligence, filter it, and present clear and concise Intel to the executive branch.

They aren't supposed to be participating in wars, overthrowing governments, and supplying weapons to governments or insurgent groups.

This country needs and deserves a top notch intelligence service, and we don't have it

Should we keep and reform what we have, or should we scrap it the way we did the OSS and start over...with a fresh mandate?
You only hear about the failures. Did you think they would blow the cover on successful opperations by publishing them in the news? As for your idea of what they should and should not be doing: What exactly do you think the purpose of gathering all that intel is, anyway? The whole idea is to use it. Who better to put that use into action than the person who gathered it in the first place? They know who everybody is, they know where all the locations are, they understand the situation. An outsider would have to be briefed on all of these things and still would not know it as well--and there is the danger that the more people who know about an opperation the more likely it will leak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,571,537 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAllenDoudna View Post
You only hear about the failures. Did you think they would blow the cover on successful opperations by publishing them in the news? As for your idea of what they should and should not be doing: What exactly do you think the purpose of gathering all that intel is, anyway? The whole idea is to use it. Who better to put that use into action than the person who gathered it in the first place? They know who everybody is, they know where all the locations are, they understand the situation. An outsider would have to be briefed on all of these things and still would not know it as well--and there is the danger that the more people who know about an opperation the more likely it will leak.
Would this be the same intelligence that brought us the invasion and occupation of Iraq? How about the intel that defied logic when it said we could install a puppet named Ahmed Chalabi to do our bidding there, and that we would be "greeted as liberators"? Would it be the same intel that appropriated funding of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan when, two decades later, they killed 3000 Americans? How about selling arms to Iran and taking the proceeds and funding rightwing death squads in Nicaragua, of which many would go on to become gang leaders that today are responsible for the flood of children to the U.S. throughout Central America trying to escape the handiwork of the CIA?

And that is only a start.

Blowback (intelligence) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 09:43 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,284,447 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAllenDoudna View Post
You only hear about the failures. Did you think they would blow the cover on successful opperations by publishing them in the news? As for your idea of what they should and should not be doing: What exactly do you think the purpose of gathering all that intel is, anyway? The whole idea is to use it. Who better to put that use into action than the person who gathered it in the first place? They know who everybody is, they know where all the locations are, they understand the situation. An outsider would have to be briefed on all of these things and still would not know it as well--and there is the danger that the more people who know about an opperation the more likely it will leak.
You only hear about the failures because that's what they are..a failure of an organization. And worse, we don't even know all the failures, but the ones we do know about are bad enough.

I mean damn...they didn't stop 9/11 and they didn't know there were no WMD in Iraq.

Those two alone should be enough for any sane person to know that the agency is broken.

If they had so many stunning successes, they'd make damn sure that we knew about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top