Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Two lesbian women who are white are suing the sperm bank that assisted them in having a child because the sperm used was from a black man.
Their claim hinges on a few things but they have stated publicly that they live in a predominantly white neighborhood and feel a black child would not have the same opportunities or acceptance as in a different neighborhood.
The huge question that no one wants to talk about isn't the goof at the sperm bank but how is it that this lesbian couple would have been perfectly content living where they are had the child not been the product of a black man's sperm.
There we have it. There isn't really any tolerance in the LGBT community unless it it tolerance for their way of thinking.
They were ok with living in an all white neighborhood before. So how tolerant are they really? They never noticed there were no blacks where they lived? I bet that neither of the lesbian women would even consider being with a black woman.
The LGBT community asks and demands tolerance yet when it comes to their own choices, tolerance isn't considered, it is their way or the highway.
LOL!
It is not nice to mess with Mother Nature!
Now don't run from it, live with it.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Knife
Two lesbian women who are white are suing the sperm bank that assisted them in having a child because the sperm used was from a black man.
Their claim hinges on a few things but they have stated publicly that they live in a predominantly white neighborhood and feel a black child would not have the same opportunities or acceptance as in a different neighborhood.
The huge question that no one wants to talk about isn't the goof at the sperm bank but how is it that this lesbian couple would have been perfectly content living where they are had the child not been the product of a black man's sperm.
There we have it. There isn't really any tolerance in the LGBT community unless it it tolerance for their way of thinking.
They were ok with living in an all white neighborhood before. So how tolerant are they really? They never noticed there were no blacks where they lived? I bet that neither of the lesbian women would even consider being with a black woman.
The LGBT community asks and demands tolerance yet when it comes to their own choices, tolerance isn't considered, it is their way or the highway.
The real huge question is what does their sexual orientation have to do with the sperm bank making an error? Would there be any difference had the same mistake been made with an infertile heterosexual couple?
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,566 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
The real huge question is what does their sexual orientation have to do with the sperm bank making an error? Would there be any difference had the same mistake been made with an infertile heterosexual couple?
The real huge question is what does their sexual orientation have to do with the sperm bank making an error? Would there be any difference had the same mistake been made with an infertile heterosexual couple?
Uh, think again. Their sexual orientation is used as a basis to consider tolerance of differences yet they chose to live in a while neighborhood, so white in fact that they feel a mixed race child wouldn't grow up in a good environment unless they move away. I cam calling into question the obvious hypocrisy of their thinking and the portrayal that the LGBT community makes tolerance one of the primary issues they face.
They aren't tolerant themselves.
Suddenly, the tolerant lesbian woman think the neighborhood they live in isn't tolerant yet they as lesbians haven't had a problem living there.
Uh, think again. Their sexual orientation is used as a basis to consider tolerance of differences yet they chose to live in a while neighborhood, so white in fact that they feel a mixed race child wouldn't grow up in a good environment unless they move away. I cam calling into question the obvious hypocrisy of their thinking and the portrayal that the LGBT community makes tolerance one of the primary issues they face.
They aren't tolerant themselves.
Suddenly, the tolerant lesbian woman think the neighborhood they live in isn't tolerant yet they as lesbians haven't had a problem living there.
I agree that the sperm bank was negligent.
I agree that the couple did not receive what they contracted for.
But to receive an award, one must show damages.
How were the plaintiffs damaged?
For a judge to rule that having a mixed race baby, instead of an all white one, and the plaintiff was damaged, opens a whole can of legal worms.
Different is not defective when it comes to children. but then again, we've been fighting this very same battle since the civil war and the Emancipation Proclamation.
IMO, the only way a judge could award damages is to rule that a mixed race child is less than an all white child and I don't think any judge would rule that way. At least in Ohio.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would there be any difference had the same mistake been made with an infertile heterosexual couple?
