Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You continue to refuse to answer the question of why you apparently believe our assessment of threats to the US should not have changed after 9/11 and are apparently obsessed with Clinton instead.
WHY do you believe the level of threat to the US from various entities didn't change on 9/11 and remained the same as it was during Clinton's presidency?
You continue to refuse to answer the question of why you apparently believe our assessment of threats to the US should not have changed after 9/11 and are apparently obsessed with Clinton instead.
Not at all. Everyone knew Iraq had WMDs. Clinton signed into law the Iraq Liberation Act. Any subsequent decisions were based on liberating Iraq, period.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,363,738 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Not at all. Everyone knew Iraq had WMDs. Clinton signed into law the Iraq Liberation Act. Any subsequent decisions were based on liberating Iraq, period.
And just WHY was this alleged liberation of Iraq more important to the US than finding/eliminating those who attacked us? THAT is the question, WHY?
Just WHERE does the Constitution make liberating other people a higher priority than protecting Americans?
BTW, there really isn't any clear answer as to why we invaded Iraq.
Yes. The Yellowcake incident. A BIG topic pre-Iraq invasion.
From wikipedia (Niger uranium forgeries):
" The Niger uranium forgeries are forged documents initially revealed by SISMI (Italian military intelligence). These documents seem to depict an attempt made by Saddam Hussein in Iraq to purchase yellowcake uranium powder from Niger during the Iraq disarmament crisis.
On the basis of these documents and other indicators, the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom asserted that Iraq violated United Nations Iraq sanctions by attempting to procure nuclear material for the purpose of creating weapons of mass destruction. "
Actually the definition of WMDs was given to nuculear weapons.
nope WMD has always been NBC...nuclear, biological, and chemical
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
