Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I had not realized that so many herein were unaware of the 14th amendment:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
I'm not surprised. It seems some people here skip to the 1st amendment and stop reading after the 2nd.
And seriously, it seems like mostly the same people who are jumping up and down to throw illegals in jail at taxpayer expense for $136 a day but begrudge every penny spent on helping the poor who are actual citizens.
The city will be held liable for her death and will be on the hook for millions of dollars. I'd say that they should also be charged for accessory to murder.
Agreed.
Any individual who harbored this dangerous criminal in their home would be facing charges, so why not these ass clowns?
Clearly, illegal aliens aren't subject to U.S. jurisdiction as they are not prosecuted for illegal entry and/or remaining in the country illegally, even when caught.
Guess what would happen to an actual U.S. citizen who gets caught breaking federal law.
And seriously, it seems like mostly the same people who are jumping up and down to throw illegals in jail at taxpayer expense for $136 a day but begrudge every penny spent on helping the poor who are actual citizens.
The Wong Kim Ark ruling further clarified that the children born in the U.S. of legal, permanent residents (who actually are subject to U.S. jurisdiction given their legal status) were automatically U.S. citizens. WKA's parents were in the U.S. legally when WKA was born in the U.S., as noted in the ruling. Anchor babies' parents aren't.
I did.
According to Trump logic, El Paso, San Jose, Austin, and San Diego, which all have many Latino illegals, should have more crime than Detroit, St. Louis, Cleveland, and Baltimore, which have few Latino illegals. Furthermore according to Trump logic New Orleans before 2005 should have been the safest city in the US, as it had virtually no "criminals" and "rapists" given that it had fewer illegals than any other US city pre-Katrina.
No, he never said anything even close to that. Link to a quote of has that says what you posted.
If I was the parent of the victim, I would investigate the households of the city officials to see if they employ illegals as servants. Spread the lawsuits far and wide in city government.
If I was the parent of the victim, I would investigate the households of the city officials to see if they employ illegals as servants. Spread the lawsuits far and wide in city government.
There are a lot more possibilities than that. Odds are that most people violate one or more laws quite often.
The entire city council at the time of inception of the law and every member that went along with it since its inception, would be brought up on charges of accessory to murder, racketeering, and organized crime.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
