Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-30-2016, 07:06 AM
 
1,556 posts, read 1,912,860 times
Reputation: 1600

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
The scary part is that is what anti gun Bloomberg proposed, banning black males from owning a gun.
The problem with that logic is that the majority of gun deaths in America aren't committed by minorities. Falsely making that claim sounds more palatable to the white viewing or listening audience. The reality is that majority of deaths by firearms are committed by whites. That's excluding the 85,000 per year non-fatal firearm injures and the accidental firearm discharges that results in serious or sometime life crippling injures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2016, 07:21 AM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,476,238 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyadic View Post
The problem with that logic is that the majority of gun deaths in America aren't committed by minorities. Falsely making that claim sounds more palatable to the white viewing or listening audience. The reality is that majority of deaths by firearms are committed by whites. That's excluding the 85,000 per year non-fatal firearm injures and the accidental firearm discharges that results in serious or sometime life crippling injures.
Incorrect.

You know how I know you have never researched your position before? Because it's off by several magnitudes.

Victims:


Firearm Offenders by race:

The only way you get the "Whites are the majority of firearm deaths" is when you egregiously add in suicide by firearm, thus muddying a criminology debate with a mental health issue.

A young, black, urban, gang affiliated, male is something like 900x more likely to by killed or injured by a firearm then a suburban, white, non-criminal, male.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:15 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyadic View Post
The problem with that logic is that the majority of gun deaths in America aren't committed by minorities. Falsely making that claim sounds more palatable to the white viewing or listening audience. The reality is that majority of deaths by firearms are committed by whites. That's excluding the 85,000 per year non-fatal firearm injures and the accidental firearm discharges that results in serious or sometime life crippling injures.
Per capita they are, and I'm not the one wanting to ban black people from owning guns al la Jim Crow, anti gun democrat Bloomberg is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:21 PM
 
109 posts, read 68,389 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
There you go, problem solved!
The only problem with Tom Clancy's book Rainbow Six was that the wrong people would have survived after they wiped out most of humanity. Thankfully Clancy saved humankind in his brilliant narrative. I won't give out any more spoilers. Then he died under suspicious circumstances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:21 PM
 
1,160 posts, read 714,184 times
Reputation: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
DUI deaths are down not because of laws but because of the increase in safety standards in automobiles. Of course this comes at the cost of money and pollution as it makes cars heavier, which requires more gas.

Not to mention almost all of the laws punished illegal action. Not the lawful drinking of any alcohol of choice. Gun laws want to punish all gun owners when conducting legal business, not just those that break the law.
It's not punishing them, it's obstructing/infringing upon them. Stop the hyperbole.

It's akin to the left accusing the right of having a war on woman for being pro-life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,314 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15653
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
DUI deaths are down not because of laws but because of the increase in safety standards in automobiles. Of course this comes at the cost of money and pollution as it makes cars heavier, which requires more gas.

Not to mention almost all of the laws punished illegal action. Not the lawful drinking of any alcohol of choice. Gun laws want to punish all gun owners when conducting legal business, not just those that break the law.
That's not true at all these laws were put in place back in the 1980's far in advance of any significant safety changes. DWI fatalities decreased by up to 50% because of these laws, the point is we actually put in changes when it came to alcohol, with guns nothing, and no one complained that we were punishing law abiding citizens with sweeping laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:24 PM
 
1,160 posts, read 714,184 times
Reputation: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's not true at all these laws were put in place back in the 1980's far in advance of any significant safety changes. DWI fatalities decreased by up to 50% because of these laws, the point is we actually put in changes when it came to alcohol, with guns nothing, and no one complained that we were punishing law abiding citizens with sweeping laws.
You both are wrong. DUI fatalities are down due to an emphasis being put on education and enforcement, not laws or car gadgets. Similar to how reductions in drug use is mostly tied to education and treatment instead of tough new laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:26 PM
 
109 posts, read 68,389 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman View Post
You both are wrong. DUI fatalities are down due to an emphasis being put on education and enforcement, not laws or car gadgets.
If DUI was really taken seriously as a public threat instead of a source of government revenue, interlock devices would be mandated on all operating vehicles and bars would be prohibited from having parking lots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 12:55 PM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,476,238 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman View Post
It's not punishing them, it's obstructing/infringing upon them. Stop the hyperbole.

It's akin to the left accusing the right of having a war on woman for being pro-life.
I am going to disagree, but I understand your sentiment. Having to write essays for a permit, pay hundreds of dollars in fees and time off work, drive an extra hundred miles every time you purchase (like I have to), and the rest of the nonsense that has been coming about while the government officials specifically state that the purpose is to reduce gun ownership then I would have to say yes it is a punishment AND a constitutional infringement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's not true at all these laws were put in place back in the 1980's far in advance of any significant safety changes. DWI fatalities decreased by up to 50% because of these laws, the point is we actually put in changes when it came to alcohol, with guns nothing, and no one complained that we were punishing law abiding citizens with sweeping laws.
What changes? Permitting alcohol sales? No "High Capacity Containers" laws? Or did we educate people on the dangers of drunk driving and only punish people who drove under the influence instead of sweeping laws that regulate people from enjoying their drinks?

There is no way you could compare average firearms laws in states like NY, CA, NJ, etc to alcohol laws with a straight face.


And the laws have been increasing for firearms. We have over 2000 on the books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 03:13 PM
 
1,556 posts, read 1,912,860 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverBulletZ06 View Post
Incorrect.

You know how I know you have never researched your position before? Because it's off by several magnitudes.

Victims:


Firearm Offenders by race:

The only way you get the "Whites are the majority of firearm deaths" is when you egregiously add in suicide by firearm, thus muddying a criminology debate with a mental health issue.

A young, black, urban, gang affiliated, male is something like 900x more likely to by killed or injured by a firearm then a suburban, white, non-criminal, male.
Why are you excluding firearm suicides? Is it because a white person is five times as likely to commit suicide with a gun as to be shot with a gun; for each African American who uses a gun to commit suicide, five are killed by other people with guns. They are still dying by use of firearm. America’s pattern of gun deaths is split across black and white, with the vast majority of whites dying from suicide and a similar proportion of blacks dying from homicide. A similar split occurs with more homicide in diverse urban cities and more suicide in the rural areas that are predominantly white. You can try to deny it all want do the numbers do not lie.

Suicide is the 2nd leading cause of death for white males between the ages of 10 - 34. It is the 3rd leading cause of death for white males between the ages 35 to 44. It is the 4th leading cause of death in white males between the ages of 45 to 54. It is the 7th leading cause of death in white males between the ages of 55 to 64. Here is the CDC chart as my proof:

http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2013/whitemen2013.pdf

The only difference between the two groups when it comes to gun deaths is blacks kill each other whereas whites kill themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top