Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18)
Does it say anywhere in that statute anything about INTENT Mr. Mason?
Simply untrue as those entrusted with enforcing the statute have made clear. Simply is not applicable to the actions of a SofS in her role.
And repeating the argument does not make it any better.
Comey in fact was a far more friendly interpreter of the law than the RW had any right to expect. But even with a right leaning FBI guy it came out to exonerate Clinton.
You love Hillary. Love is blind. You can't see that her being at best 'extremely careless' in handling sensitive information put government secrets at unnecessary risk. She used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. She had SCIF areas in both her homes and didn't secure them. Though I could go on, your love is blind.
Stop deflecting attention away from the fact that you're wrong. Ignorance of the basic principles of jurisprudence is no excuse for your error.
Means, motive, opportunity. Provide objective evidence of your proof of each of the three.
"Put up or shut up" time.
Oh boy, now you're lecturing about jurisprudence. As an FYI, a prosecutor doesn't have to prove motive. And of course Hillary had the means and opportunity [secret information and a computer].
Don't fret, despite her recklessness, she'll soon be Madame President-elect.
Last edited by jazzarama; 11-08-2016 at 10:38 AM..
So for all the Trump detractors.....are you scared he can WIN?
Of course, duh.
So, exactly what state secrets did HRC swap and with whom? I mean come on, you're alleging she's a friggin spy for gawd's sake, back it up with some evidence.
So, exactly what state secrets did HRC swap and with whom? I mean come on, you're alleging she's a friggin spy for gawd's sake, back it up with some evidence.
He can't and won't. He is a Trump supporter and they all act like Trump ,the're Trumpetts!
As an FYI, a prosecutor doesn't have to prove motive.
Good thing that the prosecutors in this case understand jurisprudence better than you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugah Ray
Anyone checking votecastr?
The numbers are still too small to be considered indicative of anything significant afaic.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
