Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Ahh. Hillary told you. I see what you did.
No it was a clip of HIM from one of his rallies used in one of her ads. Nice misdirection attempt. Sadly I am one step ahead and you are two steps back like normal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,165,778 times
Reputation: 15551
We are at war with Isis. We have to fight back but we are not looking for a war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Richmond, VA
5,047 posts, read 6,349,032 times
Reputation: 7204
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
I fail to read a fact based point in your response. I only read, as you say, emotional sarcasm about what "sounds" right. Whereas, the source that you cited for your assertion, the guy who ran the server, is clearly bereft of credibility given his role and potential liability. That lack of credibility is a hard fact.

Find me another, more objective, source for the location and then I'll give it to you. Before you quoted the guy who is on the hook for running the server, the general assertion cross all media is that the server was in the bathroom.

Edit: Also, you almost got me. Good one.

Arguing about where the serves was, whether it was in a bathroom or a server farm, does not change the fact that the location was highly illegal and more prone to hacking that would it have been if the server was where it was supposed to be. She set the server up, whether it was in the bathroom or in a rack somewhere, to evade detection for illicit actions and communications that she was undertaking. Regardless of the location that we are arguing over, she is a criminal for flouting the classified material handling procedures, she is ineligible for presidential level security clearance for doing so, and she's a liar on an issue that entails the compromise of national security.
Read up on the requirements for a President to hold a security clearance-who grants it. In his particular area, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and should quit while you can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:13 AM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,575,119 times
Reputation: 11136
The CIA is at odds with the FBI over whether it was the Russians.

Divisions between CIA, FBI surface in debate over Russian motives in election hacks - Chicago Tribune

Another Wikileaks insider says the documents were leaked by a DNC employee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,736,454 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Um didn't Trump say bomb the crap out of them and is willing to open the football, yet he "don't want war"? WAKE UP PEOPLE!
While you're clearly exaggerating, you're hinting at the truth of things. Yes, Trump is more hawkish than I'd like him to be.He's less of a war hawk than Hillary, but he's still awfully hawkish. That is just one more reason why I voted for Gary Johnson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:28 AM
 
5,544 posts, read 8,317,781 times
Reputation: 11141
I don't believe the headline or the CI A if this is what they say

CIA has been a fail since years ago and a self sustaining culture, so I find them doubtful
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:32 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,508,677 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
More interesting than the WaPo piece, which frankly hasn't gotten over the election results, is this article in the Politico.

Intel world struggles to crack the code of an untrusting Trump - POLITICO

Trump doesn't trust the CIA, and why should he? If you believe the WaPo story, it appears the CIA has it out for Trump. These are dangerous waters.

And I love you libs pushing this WaPo story for all its worth. Remember how critical you all were over the CIA's reports on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction? But now, because it fits your ideological viewpoint or you just can't accept America's rejection of Hillary you're pushing this story for all it's worth.
More recently, the CIA was the only entity in the world that thought the Benghazi attacks were caused by a video leading peaceful protesters to run amuck.

It's certainly possible that Russia directed the hacks and release of all the documents. otoh, lying is standard procedure for both Clapper and Brennan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,445,058 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Thank God the Saudis and muslim supremacists didn't get their dream candidate elected.
Not so sure they didn't---The Islamic Jihadists want someone to bolster their narrative of the Crusaders---and Saudi Arabia goes with the money...I'm sure Trump can make a deal with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,870 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Funny how the MSM is so quick to repeat rumors like this, always from an "unnamed source", with no verification or vetting of the story. Isn't that the definition of "fake news"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,354,091 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
The CIA is at odds with the FBI over whether it was the Russians.

Divisions between CIA, FBI surface in debate over Russian motives in election hacks - Chicago Tribune

Another Wikileaks insider says the documents were leaked by a DNC employee.
You are misstating what is in the article. The CIA and the FBI agreed to the Russians hacking the sites. The disagreement is whether they deliberately aided Trump. The CIA says the weight of the evidence is that they did. FBI say it is not proven beyond a doubt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top