Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:08 AM
 
28,163 posts, read 25,338,432 times
Reputation: 16665

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
Washington Post now admits its “fake news” story relied on… get this… a FAKE news source
Cool. Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:09 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,688,370 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
In light of everything else we know - BAD.
Please elaborate. People like to drop such diatribe, but they are either unwilling or unable to explain what it means in context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:09 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 4,222,629 times
Reputation: 5468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Yes and now we have Trump. Good job. Totes worth it.
You would rather have Hillary in and start a war and see young men die, than have Trump in who doesn't want war, wants to reasonably enforce existing laws and wants to make America great again. Says a lot about the other side.

Last edited by illtaketwoplease; 12-11-2016 at 06:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:14 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,747,551 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Yes and now we have Trump. Good job. Totes worth it.
The blame lies with the DNC for pushing Hillary on everyone. Sanders might have actually won. Sanders was a candidate that people were actually enthusiastic about. The Dems lost this year because they were so hell-bent on electing a terrible candidate. And if it saves us from nuclear war with Russia, then having Trump as president is absolutely worth it. The DNC made their bed full of feces and now they get to sleep in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:25 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,279,189 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Yes and now we have Trump. Good job. Totes worth it.
It's not my fault the (D)'s rejected the candidate that could have beaten Trump. If the choice is a president that is going to get along or one that is going to get us into another war, I'll live with the former.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:37 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,688,370 times
Reputation: 21097
Haha

https://i.redd.it/0xgbefnaxs2y.jpg


Source
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
3,870 posts, read 4,085,731 times
Reputation: 2379
Spacibo Mother Russia!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:49 AM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,336,963 times
Reputation: 4683
Russia did help Trump win the election. Trump asked Putin to find Clinton emails. This isn't new news, it's old news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:52 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,279,189 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Russia did help Trump win the election. Trump asked Putin to find Clinton emails. This isn't new news, it's old news.
LOL. If you think this is how to win elections I feel really bad for the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:55 AM
 
Location: SoFlo
981 posts, read 901,738 times
Reputation: 1845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
No. But what should happen is a thorough, bipartisan investigation that is taken seriously by all sides of the spectrum.

This isn't a game.
I agree, but why wasn't this done before the election took place? Given that this Russian hack accusation came out when Wikileaks really got rolling, if there is truth here that the CIA has intelligence to confirm this (and I am not saying they don't as I suspect both Russia and the US are hacking key political figures computers pretty much on a daily basis) why wasn't this fully exposed and addressed (meaning CIA would release factual evidence supporting the claim) prior to Nov 8th? At this point it seems like another last minute attempt to derail election results, as the Democrat senators are pushing Obama now that they don't like outcome of election.

Last edited by klaucka; 12-11-2016 at 07:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top