Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What one does in H.S. isn't relevant to what their history as an educated, responsible adult reveals about them. A lot of us did things in H.S. we are not proud of after we grow up. In fact, that's what "growing up" is all about. Becoming mature in our thinking as well as becoming responsible for our actions.
Are you aware that Barack H. Obama belonged to a Marxist/socialist club while at Occidental College in California, which advocated the overthrow of the U.S. Government? That is far more significant. He was an adult. He should have been denied the presidency based on that.
Gorsuch has an exemplary record as a lawyer and judge and is a Constitutionalist. That is what is important.
A fact that doesn't register with the Obama cult, apparently. Nothing can cloud the image of their dear leader. They'll just scream "racist" and "bigot" when facts intrude on their liberal delusion.
The Daily Mail has even less credibility than FOX News ( if that's possible). If this can be verified through a credible source then he really is a poor choice.
Look at this judge's record of decisions, etc. from the last ten to fifteen years. That will tell you more of what we really should be paying attention to. And yes, he's conservative, but from what I've read, he's fair and balanced. We could do a lot worse.
The leftists don't want fair and balanced.
They want it THEIR WAY, right now.
And they are going to stomp their feet and moan and groan and bellyache.
Unfortunately for them, the rules will be changed if need be, the filibuster will be eliminated, and Mr. Gorsuch will be confirmed.
I promise Gorsuch will be confirmed and the left will save the big fight for whoever comes next to replace Ginsburg.
They would be idiots doing anything but waiting for their "big" fight because this doesn't change the balance of the court at all whereas the next appointment will likely do so. So, that means it's about a 50/50 chance they'll fight this tooth and nail.
It's not the same. A circuit court has a check on it. Bad decisions can be reversed. The SCOTUS does not. A fascist judge in the 10th would not be that big a deal. But in the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has a check on it, it's called a new Supreme Court and a different make up. If that weren't the case, why are so many people paranoid about Roe v. Wade being overturned, because in your statement that could never happen and no Supreme Court decision could ever be changed/altered for infinity.
They would be idiots doing anything but waiting for their "big" fight because this doesn't change the balance of the court at all whereas the next appointment will likely do so. So, that means it's about a 50/50 chance they'll fight this tooth and nail.
They would be idiots for doing anything other than fighting every nominee. Trump and the Republicans aren't going to compromise on anything.
They would be idiots for doing anything other than fighting every nominee. Trump and the Republicans aren't going to compromise on anything.
So says the person who thinks a satirical HS newspaper is disqualifying for a SCOTUS nominee?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Really?
And yes, he's conservative, but from what I've read, he's fair and balanced. We could do a lot worse.
