Fox news FAKE news. Even the PI says they lied about Seth Rich (accuse, nationalist)

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by cisco kid

Clinton, Wasserman-Shultz, Donna Brazile should be arrested for conspiracy to commit murder and whoever they hired to carry out the hit on Seth Rich. No doubt they knew Sanders would have beaten her in a fair election, so they did everything they could to sabotage his campaign including election fraud and murder.

The democratic party is finished.

You realize Seth Rich died in July of 2016 right ?

Hillary Clinton had long won the nomination.

[Gtownoe]

Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow

Keep rolling your eyes...and tell us why you wouldn't want a murder to be investigated, fully, with someone arrested and charged.

Please tell us why the left stream media is rolling their stupid little eyeballs, too. Why don't so many on the left want to get to the truth of this murder? Why such hate and condemnation for anyone who does? Are you personally affected by someone being found guilty of the murder?

So far, the left stream media has only offered up "botched robbery" with absolutely no evidence whatsoever to corroborate that theory. Nothing at all. But they want to shut down anyone who says, "No, I really don't think that's what it is". Considering this case is not solved, no one can say, definitively, that this was X or Y.

What makes you afraid of finding out the truth?

1) It would show the direct link between their e-mails and the media, showing that they in fact sabotaged Bernie Sanders, ran a COINTEL OP in Black Lives Matter, and used a surrogated against private enterprise.

2) Show that they fabricated the 'Russian Hacking Scandal' and collusion between the media and the Democrats.

3)Show that they sabotaged their own base while using it is a "prop" in the media for votes.

4) Possibly violated Anti-Trust laws

[shaker281]

Fox News staffers 'disgusted' at network's promotion of Seth Rich conspiracy theory - May. 22, 2017

Fox News staffers EVEN are disgusted by promotion of conspiracy theories.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/medi...ex.html?iid=EL

"It took only hours for one of the biggest stories in conservative media this week, which some outlets had chosen to focus on over news that President Trump disclosed classified information to senior Russian officials, to fall apart.
"The Metropolitan Police Department continues to investigate the murder and police say there is evidence to suggest Rich was the victim of a botched robbery."

How can conservatives expect to be credible on the economy, national security, health care, etc, when they go to such lengths to create "alternative facts"?

Or, in other words, why trust liars about anything?

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

Originally Posted by Icy Tea

You'd think Bernie Sanders would rally to this man's family side and demand answers. Not a peep from that cowardly sellout of an old fossil. Rich leaked that information because he was a Bernie supporter and mad as hell the DNC colluded with Hillary to throw the Primary.
Bernie's an idiot. He could have owned the Democrat party and been the POTUS had he any backbone. Now he's on the sidelines with whatever small amount they paid him off with and he can't say a word lest they take him down with them. Which they might do anyway out of spite.

Well...everybody's favorite socialist DID get a 3rd house out of the deal and use of a private jet, so there's that.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by Icy Tea

You'd think Bernie Sanders would rally to this man's family side and demand answers. Not a peep from that cowardly sellout of an old fossil. Rich leaked that information because he was a Bernie supporter and mad as hell the DNC colluded with Hillary to throw the Primary.
Bernie's an idiot. He could have owned the Democrat party and been the POTUS had he any backbone. Now he's on the sidelines with whatever small amount they paid him off with and he can't say a word lest they take him down with them. Which they might do anyway out of spite.

members of the DNC are free to support whatever candidate they want, You realize half the superdelegates are DNC members right ???????????????????????

[shaker281]

The funniest part of all these harebrained conspiracies is that IF ANY of them are true then the GOP is utterly inneffectual to do anything about it. Shiat, after 30 years of Clinton "investigations", both Clintons are still roaming the political landscape free as birds and wealthier than ever. Is that the GOP at their best, or at their worst?

Meanwhile Trump presents a ludicrous budget proposal that has ZERO chance of passing and basically kicks all his jobless, government-help-seeking supporters to the dirty curb to beg for alms! And some wonder why in an economy of 4.4% unemployment they still cannot find jobs? I don't!

Then there is the fact that conservatives want to pretend that Clinton and Obama have the entire systen "rigged" in their favor to quash prosecution, but their man Trump cannot even pull of a hamfisted attempt to influence Comey or anyone else.

Apparently, to hear conservatives say it, Obama and the Clintons are supervillians. Yes, say it with awe!

[okcthunder1945]

Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow

Don't quit your day job because you suck at mind reading. No, I do not want "above all" that person to have something to do with Clinton. I want the damn thing solved. And I want to know why the HELL some people on the left, including the media, have a fricken problem with anyone who does. The more they shout it down, the more suspicious it becomes.

Why is this particular case so important?

They said that they "suspect" it was a botched robbery. The case is unsolved. What part of "unsolved" do you not comprehend? Until it is solved, then again, you cannot say "It was X" or "It was Y".

"Suspect botched robbery" does not mean "It WAS a botched robbery".

No, but it means it's just best possible reasoning based on the current evidence.

Again...what "again"?

Clinton of course.... she's still breathing free air.

I'm not afraid of the truth. I'm on here talking about how this needs to be solved. You're on here rolling your eyeballs at anyone who wants it to be solved. The media is out there rolling their eyeballs at anyone who wants it to be solved. I'd say that points at you as being afraid of the truth.

I wonder why you want it solved so badly? Why is this particular murder case more important than others?

What do I have "riding" on this outcome? That a murder was finally solved?

Plenty of other murder cases..... but you wish to tie this one to Clinton somehow, someway. Just be honest.

The fact that you don't give a spit if it's solved, and you keep trying to sway people away from it, that you mock those who want to know the truth shows that it is you who doesn't want it solved.

The fact is, I'm letting law enforcement do their thing.

It will be solved. One way or another, whether you like it or not. And who cares if it wasn't the DNC? Who fricken cares?! But if it was...I'm sure you'll be nowhere to be found.

Yawn......... So transparent.

[okcthunder1945]

Originally Posted by Gtownoe

1) It would show the direct link between their e-mails and the media, showing that they in fact sabotaged Bernie Sanders, ran a COINTEL OP in Black Lives Matter, and used a surrogated against private enterprise.

2) Show that they fabricated the 'Russian Hacking Scandal' and collusion between the media and the Democrats.

3)Show that they sabotaged their own base while using it is a "prop" in the media for votes.

4) Possibly violated Anti-Trust laws

See.... at least this person is honest with how much they want this case to throw the book at Clinton and everything she stands for.

See far right wingers aren't any different than the people they despise, Three Wolves In Snow.

[cisco kid]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

You realize Seth Rich died in July of 2016 right ?

Hillary Clinton had long won the nomination.

Clearly, he was murdered for bringing to light how she "won" the nomination.

More like stole than won.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by cisco kid

Clearly, he was murdered for bringing to light how she "won" the nomination.

You still havent explained that argument though.

Hillary Clinton still got the nomination and none of the emails claimed she cheated.

At best, you are making the same flawed argument every other Bernie supporter makes which is that you think members of the DNC cant support a candidate in the primary, you are wrong. Individuals, caucuses, groups, City Parties,"leagues" etc..... with in the Democratic party can endorse who ever they want. There are only 3 entities that can not and they are the 3 governing bodies themselves.

the DNC, the (S)tate (D)emocratic (E)xecutive (C)ommittees and the County DEC's

Thats it. The people in these entities can endorse candidates, but the entities themselves can not. And none of them did in 2016.