Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:17 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,778,898 times
Reputation: 7020

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
Maybe he wanted to avoid WW3 with war monger HilLIARy.
And yet Russia is already threatening to shoot down our planes, and North Korea is threatening nuclear war. The world has without a doubt gotten a lot more unstable in the past 6 months.

Quote:
Oh and there is no law against collusion.



RR
Yes there is. It's called espionage and treason. The fact that you would be ok with it if it did in fact happen is truly mind blowing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:19 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,778,898 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So...another "secret report" from an "unnamed source"? Can fake news be any more obvious?
Well apparently not to you guys since you've peddled anything that doesn't praise your Dear Leader as fake news to the point of being entirely meaningless. What you think Fake News is, is not the meaning of fake news.

Anonymous sourcing has been the standard of journalism forever. You are aware the biggest and most famous source that brought down Nixon in Watergate was anonymous right? Funny how it never bothered you guys until you started worshipping Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,123,635 times
Reputation: 1644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Yes there is. It's called espionage and treason. The fact that you would be ok with it if it did in fact happen is truly mind blowing.
Dumb your terms down when explaining. Only thing that seems to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,860,315 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
And yet Russia is already threatening to shoot down our planes, and North Korea is threatening nuclear war. The world has without a doubt gotten a lot more unstable in the past 6 months.

Yes there is. It's called espionage and treason. The fact that you would be ok with it if it did in fact happen is truly mind blowing.
So you go from Russia is Trumps master, to Russia is threatening to shoot down our planes?
If Russia has got a strangle hold on Pres. Trump, them why are the sanctions still in place and US jets shooting down Russian allied planes in Syria?

Espionage and treason are illegal, collusion is not....11 months of investigating and there is still not one iota of proof of simple collusion(Which is not a crime), Good luck proving treason.

If collusion were a crime Obama and HilLIARy would both be in Leavenworth for life.


RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:29 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,854,052 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Why did it take 2 years to investigate Watergate, which was a far far less complicated case?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
How Silly

Watergate, a crime was committed. The ones guilty were caught red handed. There was absolute Proof.

in contrast

Russians helped Trump - Just a wet dream of disgruntled Democrats who can't accept that Hillary lost and nobody is paying attention to them any more.
waldo is right, and dont forget that there were several conspirators in the watergate issue, and after eleven months there was also solid evidence that nixon did have knowledge of the cover up, but they investigators wanted to take down nixon.

in this case there is STiLL no evidence of wrong doing, even after eleven months of investigation. and the only reason it is still an issue is because the democrats keep pushing it, and claiming that because there is no evidence is the reason it must be investigated.

at what point do they realize nothing is going to come of this investigation and call an end to it? are they going to have to lose more seats in congress for this to happen?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,860,315 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
waldo is right, and dont forget that there were several conspirators in the watergate issue, and after eleven months there was also solid evidence that nixon did have knowledge of the cover up, but they investigators wanted to take down nixon.

in this case there is STiLL no evidence of wrong doing, even after eleven months of investigation. and the only reason it is still an issue is because the democrats keep pushing it, and claiming that because there is no evidence is the reason it must be investigated.

at what point do they realize nothing is going to come of this investigation and call an end to it? are they going to have to lose more seats in congress for this to happen?
Well the last 5 losses in special elections didn't teach them......
Maybe a good shellacking in the Mid-terms will finally make them get it.
Nahhhhh they will never get it.

RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:37 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,576 posts, read 28,680,428 times
Reputation: 25170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiffer E38 View Post
2.) Liberals are mad about losing the election ...
Sounds right on the money to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Canada
6,141 posts, read 3,374,624 times
Reputation: 5790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So...another "secret report" from an "unnamed source"? Can fake news be any more obvious?
Sorry, but it has been addressed early this morning by Jeh Johnson ( Director of Homeland Security) . He went into the dilemma that confronted the Obama Administration. YOU should be thankful that at least BO can be restrained.. No doubt Trump would have yelled from the rooftops if (some foreignNation) the US "taped his stuff & hacked into HIS private Stuff" ... ohhhh wait He already did that even though it never happened!! BUT his closest advisers DID get CAUGHT while interfacing with the bad actors!! Of course none of that treasonous ones said or whispered one word to him LOL .. Sorry..

So given this verifications of what Top Administrative people within the WH knew as far back as Aug/Sept 2016... What would your chosen leader do? Especially if his chosen replacement and his personal legacy was at stake?

Would he be restrained??? ROFLMBO... Simple answer is NO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 02:59 PM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,566 posts, read 10,622,240 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
And you believe it. That's what's mind blowing.
Well you believe Trump is a great president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 03:12 PM
 
3,992 posts, read 2,460,058 times
Reputation: 2350
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
Well the last 5 losses in special elections didn't teach them......
Maybe a good shellacking in the Mid-terms will finally make them get it.
Nahhhhh they will never get it.

RR
thank you for highlighting yourself as an uninformed and simple poster. You do realize the special elections were held to replace people appointed by Trump. Those appointed were put in positions b/c they represented extremely safe districts to bring about easy victories in said special elections. Yet in every single one Dem candidates have exceeded expectations and vastly outperformed results from last year. But again, keep being ignorant to how the world works and enjoy living amongst the confirmation bias safely ensconced in your bubble where you're a "real American" and are sticking it to the damned libs....the fact that any of these races were even competitive in the first place doesn't bode well for the GOP in mid-term elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top