Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2017, 11:40 AM
 
29,552 posts, read 9,737,716 times
Reputation: 3473

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
I'm not so sure. The various healthcare bills were not really popular unless you were anti-Obamacare and still are now. Some were but aren't now while others were and realize it needs fixing, not scrapping.

The issue I see is that there is likely a divide between where the economy is booming. In suburban Phoenix, there is an economic boom with many new fast food places popping up as well as a few more retail stores. However, other places may not see this yet see the stock market going up and wondering "Why aren't we booming too?"
You may also find the information in this link interesting, about where the gains are happening (or not). As to the question "why?" Not all that hard to guess in some cases, and/or easy enough to find out if further interested...

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/jobs-numbers/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2017, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,916,734 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnMe View Post
You may also find the information in this link interesting, about where the gains are happening (or not). As to the question "why?" Not all that hard to guess in some cases, and/or easy enough to find out if further interested...

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/jobs-numbers/
I find it interesting that Obama had similar jobs gains in his last two/three years, yet it was not him that led those gains, yet Trump does and he is trumpeted for the job gains despite their previous stance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2017, 12:42 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,931,574 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennyone View Post
Yeah, except trump claimed that the results before his election to office were fake..now he wants credit for them. BS. ...
Baffling, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 08:27 AM
 
29,552 posts, read 9,737,716 times
Reputation: 3473
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Baffling, isn't it?
Yes, baffling, going all the way back to when he was center stage with all those other GOP contenders for POTUS. His supporters who made it all happen, beyond baffling...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,623,335 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmissary View Post
The stock market was booming back in 1929 too, ...just before it crashed! Warren G. Harding was the MAN back then.
Actually, Hoover was president during the 29 crash. Harding died in office back in 23, then Coolidge served until March of 29
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 09:03 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
Trumps ratings at historical lows while Dow Jones at all-time high - what does this mean? (Congress, middle east)


It means when you combine unrelated things in a sentence, they're still unrelated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 09:34 AM
 
29,552 posts, read 9,737,716 times
Reputation: 3473
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Trumps ratings at historical lows while Dow Jones at all-time high - what does this mean? (Congress, middle east)

It means when you combine unrelated things in a sentence, they're still unrelated.
Might also help to demonstrate what is unrelated, and/or that not everyone is unable to determine whether all things that are positive are thanks to Trump, the GOP and/or conservatives...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,115,378 times
Reputation: 9487
Quote:
Trumps ratings at historical lows while Dow Jones at all-time high - what does this mean?
That Obama inherited two wars and a recession...and spent 8 years Fixing what Bush screwed up?

And then after 6 years in a row of economic growth and job creations, Obama handed over a healthy and steady economy to Donald Trump, who has passed no major legislation since taking office that has any impact on the economy. So most if not all credit goes to Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 09:43 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,820,981 times
Reputation: 11338
Just wait. If the likely outcome of a US default occurs this October, Dow 6,000 is likely by next summer as is 15% U3 unemployment rate (20s likely in terms of U6 real unemployment).

Trumpists won't have Obama's strong economy to use as leverage anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2017, 10:01 AM
 
29,552 posts, read 9,737,716 times
Reputation: 3473
Either way...

We all hope for a healthy economy and not just in the short-term, but if/when Trump can ask the simple question "are you better off than you were four years ago?" and if the answer is yes on the economic front, the chances for Trump to be re-elected will be much better, whether he deserves the credit or not.

Moral of that story is that Americans need to stop thinking so simply, but given what little Americans know or pay attention to when it comes to politics and economics, we are simply not too likely to have the populace do other than vote in "mysterious ways." Another reason we have the electoral college...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top