Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-12-2017, 02:59 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sAutomatic View Post
I'm going to stop this thread and bring up the fact that these white nationalists literally call themselves "alt-right".
They can call themselves whatever they want, but it's not true.

Communists used to call themselves savior of humanity. Was it true?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:14 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
'national socialism' was formed in direct opposition to socialism.



this is so stupid that i can't even respond, im just laughing

the right is not "small government"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:15 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
As I said before:

I would argue that the "right/left" philosophies we think of are not reflective of Nazism or Facism in general. You are picking and choosing specific things here to make your point - but are ignoring their actions, which are not "left wing" in nature.

As for why some historians place them on the right, here is an argument (which has already been cited multiple times):
Quote:
Some scholars consider fascism to be right-wing because of its social conservatism and its authoritarian means of opposing egalitarianism.[44][45] Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be".[46]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascis...tical_spectrum
I'm not sure I buy that. The left-wing ISN'T egalitarian. In fact, heavily liberal areas tend to be the most likely NIMBY racist:

The most Segregated Schools Are In Blue States - Washington Post

Chicago Isn't Just Segregated, It Basically Invented Modern Segregation - Chicago Magazine

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
My personal feeling on this is that Nazism and Facism is neither "right" or "left" in the context of how we think about that political spectrum.

But please, feel free to continue trying to prove that Nazis were.
I think a lot of people, including some of the scholars, like the one you cited, have some pretty odd misconceptions when it comes to characterizing left-wing and right-wing tendencies and ideology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Hitler's Nazi party was a socialist party that often was related to communist party!
LOL. Nazis hated commies as much as they hated Jews and trade unions. The "nazis were socialists" is a old, naive and ignorant line. It was a military dictatorship, which relied on private corporations to supply them with what they needed. If you have to relate then to left vs right, you can judge them by their views and actions, which were a far-right.

Early on some nazis, like Otto Strasser were socialists, and asked for corporations to be nationalized. The nazis executed them.

Socialism was never on their agenda, the word was used to rake in support from the working class. As a matter of fact the nazis banned the communist and socialist parties as soon as they had enough power.

There is a reason why the neo-nazis today scream "unite the right".

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 10-12-2017 at 03:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:19 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,917,076 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I'm not sure I buy that. The left-wing ISN'T egalitarian. In fact, heavily liberal areas tend to be the most likely NIMBY racist:

The most Segregated Schools Are In Blue States - Washington Post

Chicago Isn't Just Segregated, It Basically Invented Modern Segregation - Chicago Magazine

I think a lot of people, including some of the scholars, like the one you cited, have some pretty odd misconceptions when it comes to characterizing left-wing and right-wing tendencies and ideology.
You're conflating a lot of things here. The presumption that "segregation" is a "blue" problem is a bit disingenuous, too. Especially when you break down voting patterns by city vs. suburbs. This is far more complicated than voting patterns. NIMBYism vs. YIMBYism is also complicated, and goes well beyond political party affiliation. I live in the Bay Area, and I'm hugely "YIMBY", and I'm a left-leaning person. Yes, there are people here who are very protective of their home and neighborhood ("NIMBY") - but examples of this exist in all political parties.


I don't know anyone that is on the left that would condone anything done by the Nazi party in Germany, or the Communist party in the USSR. And for that matter, I don't know anyone on the right that would, either. Which isn't really surprising.

Let's cut to the chase here and point out that we're not really dealing with examples that fit into the "left" vs. "right" breakdown that we traditionally think of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:24 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
LOL. Nazis hated commies as much as they hated Jews. The "nazis were socialists" is a old and ignorant line. It was a military dictatorship, which relied on private corporations to supply them with what they needed.
So was Mao's China and Castro's Cuba. Right-wing? Nope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
You're conflating a lot of things here. The presumption that "segregation" is a "blue" problem is a bit disingenuous, too. Especially when you break down voting patterns by city vs. suburbs. This is far more complicated than voting patterns.
You actually have to read that Chicago Magazine article to understand how it happened, and why.

Quote:
Let's cut to the chase here and point out that we're not really dealing with examples that fit into the "left" vs. "right" breakdown that we traditionally think of.
But, we are. And I've clearly given examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:32 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,917,076 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
You actually have to read that Chicago Magazine article to understand how it happened, and why.
I'm well aware of the points brought up in it. It is very disingenuous to claim it is somehow linked to a political party, though. How do suburbs, even in "blue states", often vote? How did they vote historically when things were segregated? What was the historical context of when that happened? Are you familiar with the race riots? When were most of these suburbs in these older cities built up? Is there a correlation, perhaps, with these historical events (yes, there is).


"White flight" (and the corresponding segregation that resulted from it) is a complicated matter that cannot be simplified the way you are attempting to do here. There are A LOT of historical complexities here that go well beyond modern-day Democratic and Republican voting patterns.


Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
But, we are. And I've clearly given examples.
Are we? You keep trying to claim that Nazism and Facism are "left-wing". I'd argue that they don't fit in to the traditional left/right breakdown. Which isn't surprising since Nazis and Fascists have targeted people on both political sides through history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
So was Mao's China and Castro's Cuba. Right-wing? Nope.
Was Mao a nazi? No. Was Castro a nazi? No. We are talking about nazis in Germany.

Read a book.

I know, you are a Trump supporter, and so are the neo-nazis today who scream "unite the right".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
Are we? You keep trying to claim that Nazism and Facism are "left-wing". I'd argue that they don't fit in to the traditional left/right breakdown. Which isn't surprising since Nazis and Fascists have targeted people on both political sides through history.
One only needs to look at the views and the actions of the nazis, to see socialism was not on their to-do list. I can understand Trump supporters trying to make this false argument, because the truth hits too close to home, which is evidenced by the neo-nazis support for Trump. The supporters are embarrassed to see who else is in their team.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top