Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry
Again? lol You never asked before did you?
|
Yes I did. You probably
missed it.
Quote:
I said in a previous post, it started with FDR and his welfare.
|
No it did not. You mistakenly think that "Great society" ( the OP is talking about) and "welfare for single mothers" is one and the same thing.
In reality it's not.
Quote:
Although interesting, it's not about the sexual revolution. It's about welfare.
|
One doesn't go without the other. They go hand in hand.
If you look specifically into the history of
AFDC ( "Aid to Dependent Children" - that SPECIFIC part of the welfare program,) you'll notice that America governed by Whites resisted it as long as it could - and for a good reason, taking in consideration White Christian background of the country. The people on top were afraid of precisely what you are talking about I assume - potential rise of children born out of wedlock, and children of color in particular.
Quote:
I'm not pointing the finger at them, that's just something you made up. Overall no one benfits from the welfare "movement".
|
Wrong again. Plenty of low-income women benefited from it in the US - both White and Black.
Quote:
Now lets see if you can process information. Blacks, percentage wise, are on welfare at much higher rates.
|
Yes they are, and since I am politically-incorrect person, I see two reasons for that;
reason number one - Blacks don't fair well in the hi-tech world built by Whites,
and number two - they are poorer than Whites to begin with, as a direct result of the slavery legacy.
Since the COL in the US ( and other developed countries) is rather high ( particularly when it comes to raising children,) it's quite natural that Blacks would end up on public assistance.
Quote:
Blacks, percentage wise, come from single parent families. Children from single parent families have a smaller chance of success than two parent families.
|
When it comes to developed countries, ( and US in particular,) this would be definitely a case, because of financial situation alone ( but not limited to it.) The US overall is not well-equipped for dealing with the whole "women emancipation" issue ( see the White Christian background of the country.)
Quote:
Do you see the connection between welfare and single parent families yet?
|
Yes I do, but unlike you, I key in the poverty factor as well. And when I key that poverty factor in, the difference between a child born into one-parent family and a child born into two-parents family is not all that big. In fact I understand Black ( or any women at the bottom of society); why putting up with infidelity/abuse? It's not worth it, and they fair better being single mothers. It's a different story for women protected by money of course.
Quote:
Again
Only 8 percent of black married-couple families live in poverty. Among black families in which both the husband and wife work full time, the poverty rate is under 5 percent. Poverty in black families headed by single women is 37 percent.
|
So what are you trying to say here?
That Black women are somehow miraculously avoiding those happy marriages with successful Black males and prefer to have children all alone instead?
Or your point is that Black women shouldn't have children unless they are married ( successfully at that?)
In this case it would be convenient from YOUR point of view, but not from THEIR point of view. Because there are not enough of successful, financially-stable, marriage-minded Black men to go around, so these women will end up having no husband and no children at all ( which would be convenient from your point of view as I've said, but not theirs.)
And if you'd like to make it a rule for Blacks to not to have children born out of wedlock, then on which ground? Based on Christian beliefs? But then you'll have to go back to the square one and look where the whole "sexual revolution" thing came from.
Quote:
You have to quit falsely playing the race card. Again when one comes from a single parent family their chances for success diminishes. That has nothing to do with race.
|
Oh, race has a lot to do with it. Look even how people of color identify what family is, vs the typical White American understanding of what "family" is. So all these Hillary claims "it takes a village to raise a child" is foreign ( and false) to White America concept. But it's a right concept for Africa.
Another thing - when you are talking about "single parent" family, your statement is correct, unless we are talking about an educated woman with tonnes of money. Then the outlook changes all of a sudden. See how this works, and how the way you are connecting dots becomes faulty?
Quote:
I'd love to hear your reasoning on why an overwhelming majority of blacks are from single parent families.
Especially when society is less racist today.
|
My reasoning is that not all women are the same, and Black women are more compatible with ideas of matriarchate, being in charge of the family, children, and so on. So when she has the marriage-minded man around - fine, but if not, she'll go ahead and do what's natural for her. I mean it has been mentioned here, that there was no "marriage institution" in Africa, the way it has been established in Christian Europe, no? All this of course goes against the very foundation of the US, but I never said that White American culture and Black American culture are compatible at their very core.