Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2018, 05:11 AM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,904 posts, read 5,591,238 times
Reputation: 12963

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebeldor View Post
If you think voting actually makes a difference I feel sorry for you.
Does not voting make a difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2018, 05:15 AM
 
267 posts, read 122,169 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebeldor View Post
I hate Trump, but do you actually think this $1.3 billion travesty will save the country?
1.3 trillion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 05:19 AM
 
267 posts, read 122,169 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Unwilling to read the link or do anything to be informed without some spoon feeding won't get much sympathy around here
Sounds like but you don't know and that sounds like too.
More baseless accusations sounds like.
You are not even discussing the bill. Just whining that is bad because some conservative pundit told you so

Tell us how would you have allocated the money? Are you just upset because congress did nor agree to pay for Trump’s wall? Don’t blame them, Trump said Mexico will pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 05:22 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Yeah, we get it.

The burn down the country as long as it takes Trump out crowd is well known.
That was the mentality when Obama became President. Did you forget?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,311 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
I hope Trump does veto the bill, because I predict that then history will be made, as the Democrats in congress will join the Republicans and have enough votes to override the veto. They will show the kind of unified force that is needed to save our country and give Trump a major put-down, in the process.
I haven't heard much from Trump, does he even have an opinion on this other than being for increases in military spending. He is not a conservative when it comes to deficits. There has been some bipartisan criticism of this bill, the method in which this got approved absolutely stinks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 06:20 AM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Sen. Kennedy, R-LA comments on the 1.2T omnibus bill was funny but tragic also because he's right.

“The whole process sucks. I think whoever designed this isn’t qualified to run a food truck.â€
Kennedy claimed that senators would “probably get a memo on it tomorrow written in Swahili.â€
“This is a Great Dane-sized whiz down the leg of every taxpayer,â€
Kennedy continued. “Everyone who participates in this process ought to put a bag over their heads.â€


With $1.2T omnibus bill topping 2,200 pages, Congress needs CliffsNotes | Fox News

Tragic because what is the point in voting GOP when they give the farm away to Dems who are quite happy with the bill.

GOP posts text of $1.3T spending bill with shutdown deadline days away | Fox News

Democrats feel very good because so many of our priorities for the middle class were included," said Schumer.
In contrast, the conservative House Freedom Caucus said all 32 of its members would vote unanimously against the bill.
It's funny how some whine and scream for "compromise", then when it happens they are STILL not SATISFIED.

I DO think the Senate should look long and hard about their rules.

The House passed EVERY SINGLE appropriation bill back in the fall but because of the Senate rules the repubs could NOT get theirs passed.

Harry Reid NEVER passed a Budget bill all during the Obama admin, which is WHY we need such a big spending budgtet now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,076 posts, read 51,246,227 times
Reputation: 28325
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
I have my doubts about Army Rangers who couldn't get over a 30 ft. wall, try though they might.

Watch these three guys do it with a wooden pole.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhNs7HcBW6o
I got a 32 foot ladder in my back yard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,076 posts, read 51,246,227 times
Reputation: 28325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
Finally, you've become copecetic with my thinking. Hope you're correct on this. Maybe you don't realize this, but your post is very representative of the inevitable realization by republicans, that Trump and his cohorts are not at all of the same political party and are as much at odds with them, as they are with the Democrats. Trump has now, clearly identified himself as the enemy of uts all, so what's the delay in giving him the boot?
Trump had little if anything to do with this bill. He is disinterested and, frankly, mentally incapable of comprehending it. It was written by the DC special interests and lobbyists in collusion with their stooges in both parties like every other budget bill ever passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 07:05 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,661,250 times
Reputation: 13053
Trump just tweeted he is now considering a veto of the bill.

The backlash was felt and hopefully the veto is forthcoming.

It time to put that wooden pole where it belongs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 09:17 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,661,250 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuca Racha View Post
You are not even discussing the bill. Just whining that is bad because some conservative pundit told you so

Tell us how would you have allocated the money? Are you just upset because congress did nor agree to pay for Trump’s wall? Don’t blame them, Trump said Mexico will pay for it.
More disappointment for you here as I discus the veto possibility.

The president can veto this nasty bill several ways. One is a "Pocket Veto"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veto

A bill can also become law without the President's signature if, after its presentment, the President simply fails to sign it within the ten days noted. If there are fewer than ten days left in the session before Congress adjourns, and if Congress does so adjourn before the ten days have expired in which the President might sign the bill, then the bill fails to become law. This procedure, when used as a formal device, is called a pocket veto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top