Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2018, 01:44 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,778,487 times
Reputation: 6856

Advertisements

Lock him up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2018, 01:45 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,400,866 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by what'd i miss View Post
His brand will probably be torn from the walls like sadaam being toppled in the streets.
Only if you plan on a war first. That's what it took to "topple Sadaam in the streets".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 01:46 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,400,866 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire600 View Post
I have never seen such a ****ed up thread in my life. Hillary pays millions to a spy for a fake paper full of lies then the FBI uses it to get a wire tap on trump and tries to take him down and moonbats get all excited about this. Unbelievable and serious trump derangement syndrome.

Obama lied his ass if for 8 years. He never drew an honest breath.
As we saw by the recent NYT scandal, the Left's morals are one sided.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 01:57 PM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,196,360 times
Reputation: 3877
Why are we rehashing old news? This story dominated the media last year when it came out and we knew Don Jr took a meeting with a Russian lawyer that said she had dirt on the Clintons. Is taking a meeting illegal now? Hillary can pay Russians for opposition research but Don Jr can’t take a meeting looking for dirt in his opponent?

I still believe this story was the one that was supposed to get Trump to step down last year. Now they are bringing it back. Do people really believe Don Jr was the mastermind of the whole Russia collusion narrative. They still have nothing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:14 PM
 
1,991 posts, read 901,694 times
Reputation: 2627
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
Why are we rehashing old news? This story dominated the media last year when it came out and we knew Don Jr took a meeting with a Russian lawyer that said she had dirt on the Clintons. Is taking a meeting illegal now? Hillary can pay Russians for opposition research but Don Jr can’t take a meeting looking for dirt in his opponent?

I still believe this story was the one that was supposed to get Trump to step down last year. Now they are bringing it back. Do people really believe Don Jr was the mastermind of the whole Russia collusion narrative. They still have nothing
Check your facts, come back and try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:15 PM
 
27,623 posts, read 21,140,218 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Trump just made 2 problematic admissions about the Trump Tower meeting

The first is that Trump appears to have broken some new ground here when it comes to admitting the true purpose of the Trump Tower meeting with a Kremlin-aligned lawyer — and even further contradicted the initial statement he helped draft about it.

The second issue here are the final words of the tweet. “I did not know about it!” This is something Trump has said regularly about the Trump Tower meeting and something he has re-upped now that Michael Cohen is reportedly telling people that Trump did know about it.

Trump seems to be arguing against his own point by assuring us that he had nothing to do with this meeting, which — oh, by the way — was totally on the up-and-up. Trump might as well have just confirmed The Post's report that he is worried about what the meeting portends for his son.

Trump just made 2 problematic admissions about the Trump Tower meeting
Trump is digging his own grave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:19 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,277,048 times
Reputation: 5253
what federal law was violated here? tell me the federal code.


So did Wikileaks also violated federal law for publishing the dirt of Hillary and the DNC and every news outlet and internet that published the "dirt"?


I didn't know there was a law that says you can't talk to Russians and hear any gossip or dirt on another person.....does Hillary falls under a protected class by herself under the constitution? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
3,365 posts, read 5,244,125 times
Reputation: 4205
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
Why are we rehashing old news? This story dominated the media last year when it came out and we knew Don Jr took a meeting with a Russian lawyer that said she had dirt on the Clintons. Is taking a meeting illegal now? Hillary can pay Russians for opposition research but Don Jr can’t take a meeting looking for dirt in his opponent?

I still believe this story was the one that was supposed to get Trump to step down last year. Now they are bringing it back. Do people really believe Don Jr was the mastermind of the whole Russia collusion narrative. They still have nothing
Because their spin didn't work last time this came up. Here they are trying to spin it a different way hoping their idiot foll.. viewers don't remember what went down last round.

There are some factual errors/ommissions in the article, it is no wonder the right calls them fake news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:22 PM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,196,360 times
Reputation: 3877
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC23 View Post
Check your facts, come back and try again.
What new revelations are there from last year? We already knew about the meeting and that she said she had dirt on Hillary to get the meeting. And obviously he was looking for opposition research on Hillary. What is new?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2018, 02:22 PM
 
51,655 posts, read 25,850,631 times
Reputation: 37895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
what federal law was violated here? tell me the federal code. ...
This has been posted dozens of times on this forum and already twice on the thread.

Plus, it is easy to look up.



Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy View Post
IT IS :52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals


Prohibition It shall be unlawful for—
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make— (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or


(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.


Trump Administration taking part in it...hmmm those lies and stories and reversals and rolling admissions are ALL too well known by their own TV interviews and tweets! They are just trying, to now tell America, that their breaking the law wasn't breaking the law. Maybe not one law, but possibly many laws!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top