Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:15 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
That's fine if it's your work. The rest of the country is not bound by what works for you.
It better work for you too. That is copyright law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:16 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,565,470 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
So I’m supposed to feel sorry for rich musicians who can cry every night into a bucket of money?


Maybe they can take their anger out by giving free concerts for Hillary again to see if it actually helps her this time
Why would you feel sorry? A song was used without permission so the artist is putting a stop to it. The only ones getting hysterical & flapping their hands about it are the usual con drama queens on here who have no life. Losers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,531,203 times
Reputation: 17617
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron View Post
HAPPY is a wonderful, positive, upbeat song with a message added in...

Disgraceful for Trump to use it....
he embodies NONE of the positivity.
It's an odd song for sure to be used at a Trump rally, no matter who chose the song. Someone said elsewhere on tis board that at a rally last week, the Stones' "Sympathy For the Devil" was used as he came in. I don't know that to be true, but it'd be a perfect choice if it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:17 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,088,583 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...011936027.html

Yawn -- you entertainers make the music, you get paid big sums of money -- YOU DO NOT GET TO CENSOR how your music is used. Don't like it? Tough. Go get a real job.
Geez, you seem triggered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:20 AM
 
Location: So Cal
10,034 posts, read 9,512,383 times
Reputation: 10455
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Why would you feel sorry? A song was used without permission so the artist is putting a stop to it. The only ones getting hysterical & flapping their hands about it are the usual con drama queens on here who have no life. Losers.
LOL...Kind of ironic since him and two others got hit with a 7 million judgement for copyright infringement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:20 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Betcha don't know what the real news actually is.

Apparently it depends on the venue as to whether or not he can use the music.

According to this, political use requires permission:

When Politicians Use Music Without Permission It
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:20 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
If they play it in all bars every night at closing time you should be paid. It is not uncommon for an artist to earn $500,000 a year just because their song gets played by someone who already owns a single copy of the CD.
Williams could also pull the song from his BMI or ASCAP catalogue or limit the way it should be used.
Its similar to what Monsanto and farmers are in lawsuits over.



No one is profiting from it.
They are not selling tickets.
Now, if these rallies were for monetary gain in sales of the song, then by all means they would and should be compensated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,967 posts, read 75,229,826 times
Reputation: 66939
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
Heck, the have the entire Lee Greenwood catalog to use. What more do they need?
LMAO ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
If someone buys my work, it is their to do with it as they please, as long as it is not copied and resold, without my approval.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
It better work for you too. That is copyright law.
Wrong again! D'oh!

If someone buys your work, and there is mutual consent in writing that they can do with it as they please, then that is OK under the law.

If someone buys your work and uses it for commercial purposes without your consent - playing it at a political rally, for instance - that is a violation of copyright law.

Geez, you law-and-order conservative types can't even get this simple law straight. No wonder this country is such a mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:22 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
It's an odd song for sure to be used at a Trump rally, no matter who chose the song. Someone said elsewhere on tis board that at a rally last week, the Stones' "Sympathy For the Devil" was used as he came in. I don't know that to be true, but it'd be a perfect choice if it was.

I disagree, I have no sympathy for a compulsively lying con-man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2018, 09:24 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...011936027.html

Yawn -- you entertainers make the music, you get paid big sums of money -- YOU DO NOT GET TO CENSOR how your music is used. Don't like it? Tough. Go get a real job.
Cover Bands that sing other musicians music....
Happens nightly in Austin Texas, in over 100 venues.
Now, it is for profit and violates copyright legislation..... Who is screaming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top