Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you happy with Trump’s deal to reopen the Federal government for 3 weeks?
I’m happy with the deal 41 36.61%
It’s ok 50 44.64%
I’m unhappy with this deal 21 18.75%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2019, 01:49 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,589,174 times
Reputation: 4852

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Seriously? Why must you lie? Is your username pronounced "TEP Lie to Me"?

Lie #1. Overwhelming? In recent years, overstays have exceeded illegal crossings by a few percentage points while the overall illegal population remains mostly illegal crossers. There is no "overwhelming" here in any direction.
"In 2014, about 4.5 million US residents, or 42 percent of the total undocumented population, were overstays." Note this is from an anti-wall source. The 2,000 Mile Wall in Search of a Purpose: Since 2007 Visa Overstays have Outnumbered Undocumented Border Crossers by a Half Million - The Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS)
But the wall will do nothing to affect the people already in the US, so why are you looking at "overall illegal population" in the US? You should be looking at the number of new/additional illegal immigrants if you want to know the effect of a border wall on illegal immigration. According to your source, in 2014 2/3 of illegal immigrants were illegal overstays. So the border wall would affect at most some portion of the remaining 1/3 of illegal immigrants. Once you factor in Canadian border crossers and those who cross via legal ports of entry, you are probably looking at less than 1/4 of overall illegal immigrants affected by the wall. Moreover, according to your source, the ratio of overstays to illegal border crossers continues to trend towards overstays.

In other words, your 42% number is totally irrelevant to the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Lie #2. Continue to get smaller? I've posted the stats multiple times. The number was 340,000 in 2011. If it was continuing to get smaller we would be below 200,000 by now yet the number was 400,000 last year. And the numbers for the first two months of fy2019 are over 50,000 per month which extrapolates to 600,000 for a year. That is not "getting smaller".

The wall won't stop overstays. So friggin what? We have multiple problems that require multiple solutions. The time is past for playing one against the other to achieve inaction on all of them.
The number of border crossers has been trending downwards for years. 2017 had the fewest in at least 2 decades. Here's a chart. Explain to me how the number of border crossers is not generally continuing to get smaller.

Link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2019, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,825,871 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
How do you know they have not conducted this stuff? I posted it before, how many miles they have done and how many they have to go....how do you 100% know they did not do more with the money they had while doing it initially?
Because Bob the builder's plans for his wall, or lack thereof, were looked at.

Quote:
The report from the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan group that forms part of Congress' oversight arm, said that "key information" is missing from the plans.

It further concluded that the US Department of Homeland Security "faces an increased risk that the Border Wall System Program will cost more than projected, take longer than planned, or not fully perform as expected."

Factors like a varying terrain and land ownership had not been taken fully into account, the report said, which drive up costs.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...-report-2018-8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 02:14 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11133
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Because Bob the builder's plans for his wall, or lack thereof, were looked at.


https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...-report-2018-8

O.K., so I'll play your game....were these certified wall/fence builders? Who were they, what is their actual job? Were they even considered "builders"? Or was it just a bunch of number cruncher's that have no clue what they are even looking at, except numbers?





Thanks for the link, this is also from your link:


Quote:
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told CNN that it would be "misleading and inaccurate" for the Government Accountability Office to say that "progress is not being documented or to imply that progress is not being tracked."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 02:34 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...xO1RWVjJeeW-lM

30 Democrats in Puerto Rico with 109 lobbyists for weekend despite shutdown
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,825,871 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
O.K., so I'll play your game....were these certified wall/fence builders? Who were they, what is their actual job? Were they even considered "builders"? Or was it just a bunch of number cruncher's that have no clue what they are even looking at, except numbers?





Thanks for the link, this is also from your link:
How about you just show us the full report for trump's projected wall including design, feasibility, cost/benefit analysis, cost of material and labor, where exactly the wall will be built, and projected cost of maintenance.

We will wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 02:56 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5990...#sp=show-clips

Rep. Steny Hoyer has thrown doubt on the Democrats' unity: Varney
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,825,871 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5990...#sp=show-clips

Rep. Steny Hoyer has thrown doubt on the Democrats' unity: Varney
Of course, that is fox news, the new national enquirer for trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:06 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Of course, that is fox news, the new national enquirer for trump.
So you think Hoyer didn't say that. Guess you don't believe what you hear. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:19 PM
 
62,972 posts, read 29,162,429 times
Reputation: 18594
[quote=AfriqueNY;54174734]
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
I'll just leave this here, since it's obvious that you know better then them dam people on the border patrolling.....

See the comment below yours ......
All the immigrants I know of flew here
Illegal aliens aren't "immigrants" and no, illegal aliens don't fly here that requires a passport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:25 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
https://insider.foxnews.com/2019/01/...dbd3Gstmn5RtsY

Former Utah congressman and Fox News contributor Jason Chaffetz slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for urging President Trump to delay his planned State of the Union address amid the partial government shutdown.
Pelosi (D-Calif) on Wednesday suggested Trump postpone the televised address -- scheduled for Jan. 29 -- until the shutdown ends, or submit the address in writing.
“Sadly, given the security concerns and unless the government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to Congress on January 29," Pelosi wrote in a letter to Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top