Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrasser View Post
Shame on those dims that voted present, and didn't have the ball$ to vote yea or nay...Shame on you!
There was no bill to vote for, so what's the point of entertaining the trolls in the Senate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:38 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,654,666 times
Reputation: 21097
There was a great infographic used to explain it on the US Senate floor.



https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03...3619298559.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:40 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,654,666 times
Reputation: 21097
As seen from the UK. The Democrats are the laughing stock of the world these days. Burnt by Russiagate, and the crazed AOC.



Senate votes down Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal 57-0 with high-profile Democrats joining Republicans to show their disapproval of radical plan as she says she didn't want vote to happen and charges GOP climate policy with wrecking havoc on world



Welcome to the real world "Sandy".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:41 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,832,764 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
Because AOC and Democrats didn't expect a vote on it yet, they explicitly said they wanted this to be a nonpartisan dialouge, not a partisan power-move.

The Republicans would simply not hear it, and elected to deny public hearings and expert testimony.
You do not introduce a resolution unless you want a vote, that is like the purpose of a resolution.

If they wanted this to be just dialogue, then it should have stayed as such, instead, they created a resolution.

Why did the Democrats not vote yes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:43 PM
 
3,930 posts, read 2,100,032 times
Reputation: 4580
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I believe the exchange rate is 65 to 1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:44 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,071,729 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
How can you have a "nonpartisan dialoge" with crazed people who insist the world is ending in 12 years, that we have to stop flying planes and eating hamburgers? And they are absolutely intolerant of any view but theirs.



Ain't happening.
It's impossible to have any nonpartisan dialogue with crazed Republicans. This much they have demonstrated with this ridiculous snubbing stunt. The dialogue will continue, even if Republicans are intolerant of it.


Scientists are not ridiculous people, and they are not saying that the world is ending. They are merely talking the truth about irreparable harm. It's just irreparable harm to the environment, though, nothing that will hurt the Rich that greatly.

The Green New Deal (as it currently stands as a bunch of platitudes) does not including not flying planes or not eating hamburgers. These are talking points that Republicans have been misleading their voters with for ages. Liberals like driving cars, flying planes, and eating the cheap garbage left-overs of food processing, just like Republicans do.

They are also aware of what scientists have found are the causes of Expected Physics.
Thus the open dialogue would have allowed scientists and anyone the public wanted (including even maybe the "greatly oppressed" mega-wealthy fossil fuel CEOs) to discuss this with the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
Because AOC and Democrats didn't expect a vote on it yet, they explicitly said they wanted this to be a nonpartisan dialouge, not a partisan power-move.

The Republicans would simply not hear it, and elected to deny public hearings and expert testimony.
There was no bill, no details, nothing. The whole thing only shows how low DC has sunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,835 posts, read 24,927,606 times
Reputation: 28537
AOC is a walking, talking slap in the face to America. It's criminal that hard working Americans have to pay taxes to subsidize this socialists existence. We deserve better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:51 PM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,812,050 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beach Sportsfan View Post
Because it wasn’t going to pass anyways. The Green Deal as it stands is very vague and even environmentalists have said its unrealistic at the time. The vote was for the Republicans to use it as an example of AOC running the Dem party. It failed
Then why put it up when it is very vague and unrealistic? It isn't even realistic enough to start a conversation. It is fantasy. A waste of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2019, 07:52 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,654,666 times
Reputation: 21097
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha You got to love the man.



Trump told Republican senators not to destroy the Green New Deal 'too much' because 'I want to run against it'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top