Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For life! And even after his life is over, he's forever impeached and this is noted in historic records forever.
Sure, it will be forever known the DNC used impeachment as a political weapon to try an unseat a duly elected official.
It's like if a cop framed and arrested a person. Sure, it will always be true they were arrested, but when it was done not for justice but for unjust reasons...
You are delusional. You know that President Donald J. Trump will not be removed from office, and most likely will win a second term. What will happen to all the TDS victims then? Self immolation?
How is it you believe he will win a second term? Only if you believe the polls are ALL wrong and have been wrong for a long time. This isn't a close race at all right now. Biden has a huge edge.
It's not too late to save America from Donald Trump and his brainless supporters in Congress and America.
Since your side is going to have to convince some of those supporters to join your side if you want any chance of winning in 2020, its laughable you pretend to be of higher intellect.
This is just how ****ed up and uncivil the left is becoming. You cannot simply accept that others have views that differ from yours. If they have had enough of runaway illegal immgration and China stealing our patents and other intellectual properties, you think you can marginalize them by just labelling them as brainless.
Safe to say 2020 will be a landslide with these tactics.
Sure, it will be forever known the DNC used impeachment as a political weapon to try an unseat a duly elected official.
It's like if a cop framed and arrested a person. Sure, it will always be true they were arrested, but when it was done not for justice but for unjust reasons...
What is unjust about the reasons? That you don't like democrats so it's okay for the president to be corrupt?
How is it you believe he will win a second term? Only if you believe the polls are ALL wrong and have been wrong for a long time. This isn't a close race at all right now. Biden has a huge edge.
How is it you believe he will win a second term? Only if you believe the polls are ALL wrong and have been wrong for a long time. This isn't a close race at all right now. Biden has a huge edge.
Because they have such a great track record.
LOL, Biden. 10 months of more potential pedophile lap sitting leg hair stroking memes. This should be good.
Where did Trump claim executive privilege? Pat Cippollone's October 8, 2019 letter said the Executive would not cooperate with any subpoena because Trump deemed the process "illegitimate". It did not assert executive privilege.
The process for asserting and dealing with executive privilege is outlined in US v. Nixon and Oversight Comm. v. Holder: When subpoenaed, the Executive responds to the subpoenas and asserts privilege over specifically identified documents or testimony and explains the basis for the claim of privilege. That assertion can then be challenged in Court.
Here, Trump just had the Executive ignore the subpoenas. He did not assert privilege and her certainly did not meet the requirements for properly asserting privilege as set forth in Nixon and Holder.
House Democrats sent a subpoena to Esper on Oct. 7, giving him until Tuesday to comply. The House has warned that failure to do so would be evidence of obstruction of justice.
In the letter sent Tuesday, the Department of Defense pushed back on the notion that failure to comply would constitute obstruction of justice. “Invoking reasonable legal defense to a subpoena, including invoking legal privileges that are held by the President, in no way manifests evidence of obstruction of otherwise warrants an adverse inference,” the letter reads.
The house has had over 3 months since this time - they could have requested Judicial (Courts) to rule which would have been expedited - those could have determined if congress could compel but they were afraid of the answer.
Also the examples cited do NOT show clear rulings that would apply here - this issue is about foreign policy which was specifically EXCLUDED in those rulings.
Oh, believe me, we know ! We know your side doesn't care about truth, ethics, honesty, respect for the Constitution, and all of the things that made America special. But I have to give you credit for your honest answer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
