Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I already gave you a link in the other thread (discussing John Kerry's comments confirming that Biden was acting on behalf of the US and not in his personal interests). You ignored it and responded with a non sequitur. You can still click on it to your heart's content.
Who in the US government had the power to tell Joe to do that? The only person above him in the chain of command was Obama. Is he corrupt too?
You're intentionally getting hung up on chain of command to try to muddy the issue when the only relevant question is whether Biden was there at the behest of the State Department to promote official US policy.
Actually, this discussion here is all for Naught, because the Republicans in the Senate, thanks to the Pelosers in the house, are starting to gather evidence to look into the Ukraine situation with the Bidens. It's out of the bag now.
Well, Rob Portman and Ron Johnson will get quite the surprise to find themselves investigating themselves given that they also supported Shokin's removal in writing at the time.
Were these two Republican Senators "in" on what you appear to think was a vast corrupt international conspiracy to keep Hunter Biden employed?
The VP only answers to the congress in the same way that Trump does now. He does what he feels is in his power to do and if he exceeds that authority it is up to the Congress to impeach. But they better have the goods. Do you see why, yet?
Why didn't Congress investigate back in 2015/2016? Some of them are claiming it was obvious corruption. Why didn't they do anything in the moment? They knew everything then that they do now.
Even if the Congess could tell Joe to go over there and do what he did, if Joe had considered there might be a conflict of interest to do that, why didn't he say, maybe I shouldn't? I can see someone outside of the administration telling Joe it might be a good idea to get the prosecutor fired, and Joe, thinking about his son's position, says to himself, Maybe I'd better not do that. Sure, that's the way it went down.
Who in the US government had the power to tell Joe to do that? The only person above him in the chain of command was Obama. Is he corrupt too?
Your chain of command statement is baldly untrue, by the way. The Vice-President stands outside the chain of command. The Vice-President cannot boss around the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Education, or the President's aides. You should read up on that.
I know that's the leftist line, but what's it based on? Last I checked, investigation happy Dems never called for an independent congressional inquiry into the matter. No, they just take the previous administration's word and Ukraine's word, though the fired prosecutor blames Biden for his firing and has launched a lawsuit in his country.
What’s it based on? That would history and facts.
This is like trying to teach calculus to an alpaca.
Well, lets face it, Democrats have never been good at math. They can't even count votes without screwing it up.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
